Abstract
Collaboration is an indispensable tool to promote and increase research. However, little is known about the role of women in collaborative efforts among educational scholars, especially in developing countries, such as Chile. We apply social network analysis (SNA) to examine the relationships and patterns that emerge from a dataset retrieved from Web of Science (WoS) of coauthored scholarly publications. Using sociograms and networks’ centrality indicators (density, degree, betweenness, and closeness) and bibliometric results, this study focuses on detecting the role of women in the collaborative networks. Our results show that the presence of women in the research space is stable across time, but they tend to collaborate more than men, acting as important bridgers since 2000, and that their contribution is relevant in promoting networking. This paper invites a reflection about the policies of research and gender, as well as the positionality of women doing knowledge on education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hwang, J. (2010). Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: two indices, the RC-index and the CC-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities. Scientometrics, 83(1), 1–13.
Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Capraseccaa, A. (2009). The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity. Scientometrics, 81(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2131-7.
Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2013). Gender differences in research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.07.002.
Ackers, L., & Gill, B. (2008). Moving people and knowledge: scientific mobility in a enlarging European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publisher.
Acuna, M. E. (2016). Mujeres y educacion superior: cartografias de un transito. In C. Zúñiga, J. Redondo, M. López, & E. S. Cruz (Eds.), Equidad en la educacion superior: desafíos y proyecciones en la experiencia comparada (pp. 153–170). Chile: Ediciones y publicaciones El Buen Aire S.A.
Adamic, A., & Adar, E. (2005). How to search a social network. Social Networks, 27(3), 187–203.
Aequalis. (2017). Participación femenina en cargos directivos en instituciones de educación superior chilena. Nota Técnica. Retrieved March 24, 2018, http://www.aequalis.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Participacion-femenina-en-cargos-directivos-IES4.pdf.
Alemán, A. M. (2017). Generational dispositions of women faculty: a critical examination. In P. L. Eddy, K. Ward, & T. Khwaja (Eds.), Critical approaches to women and gender in higher education (pp. 215–234). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Andersen, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0?: ideas, technologies and implications for education (vol. 1, no. 1). Bristol, England: JISC.
Araujo, K., & Moreno, C. (2005). Nudos Críticos para la Igualdad. Género y Educación Superior en Chile. Santiago, Chile: Universidad Academia de Humanismo Cristiano.
Araujo, E. B., Araujo, N. A. M., Moreira, A. A., Herrmann, H. J., & Andrade, J. A. S. (2017). Gender differences in scientific collaborations: women are more egalitarian than men. PLoS One, 12(5), e0176791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176791.
Aten, K., DiRenzo, M., & Shatnawi, D. (2017). Gender and professional e-networks: implications of gender heterophily on job search facilitation and outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.056.
Austin, A. E., & Baldwin, R. G. (1991). Faculty collaboration: enhancing the quality of scholarship and teaching. In ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3), 590–614.
Barnes, J. A. (1969). Graph theory and social networks: a technical comment on connectedness and connectivity. Sociology, 3(2), 215–232.
Barnett, G. A. (2011). Encyclopedia of social networks, CA: Sage. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Boschini, A., & Sjogren, A. (2007). Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(2), 325–365. https://doi.org/10.1086/510764.
Boyle, P. J., Smith, L. K., Cooper, N. J., Williams, K. S., & O'Connor, H. (2015). Gender balance: women are funded more fairly in social science. Nature, 525, 181–183.
Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002.
Bozeman, B., & Youtie, J. (2016). Trouble in paradise: problems in academic research co-authoring. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(6), 1717–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5.
Bozeman, B., Gaughan, M., Youtie, J., Slade, C. P., & Rimes, H. (2016). Research collaboration experiences, good and bad: dispatches from the front lines. Science and Public Policy, 43(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv035.
Braisher, T. L., Symonds, M. R. E., & Gemmell, N. J. (2005). Publication success in nature and science is not gender dependent. BioEssays, 27(8), 858–859.
Brunner, J. J., & Salazar, F. (2009). La investigación educacional en Chile: una aproximación bibliométrica no convencional. Documento de Trabajo CPCE, 1. Retrieved June 6, 2018, http://www.cpce.cl/publicaciones/documentos-de-trabajo/29-la-investigacion-educacional-en-chile-una-aproximacion-bibliometrica-no-convencional.
Carcamo, P. F., Garay-Fluhmann, R., & Gaymer, C. F. (2014). Collaboration and knowledge networks in coastal resources management: how critical stakeholders interact for multiple-use marine protected area implementation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 91, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.01.007.
Castillo, R., Grazzi, M., & Tacsir, E. (2014). Women in science and technology. What does the literature say. Retrieved March 24, 2018, https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/6047/CTI_TN_Women_in_Science_and_Technology.pdf?sequence=1.
CINDA. (2016). Educación Superior en Iberoamérica: Informe 2016. Retrieved June 6, 2018, https://www.cinda.cl/download/libros/CINDA-2012-Informe-de-Educacion-Superior-INTERIOR-101%20(1).pdf.
Coate, K., & Howson, C. K. (2016). Indicators of esteem: gender and prestige in academic work. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(4), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.955082.
CONICYT. (2016). Realidad nacional en formacion y promocion de mujeres cientificas en ciencia, tecnologia, ingenieira y matematicas. Retrieved March 24, 2018, Santiago, Chile: http://www.conicyt.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/PPT-Estudio-Realidad-NACIONAL-Genero-y-STEM_16_CONICYT-ISONOMA.pdf.
CONICYT. (2017a). Participación femenina en programas de CONICYT 2007–2016. Retrieved March 24, 2018, www.conicyt.cl.
CONICYT. (2017b). Política Institucional Equidad de Género en Ciencias y Tecnología. Período 2017–2025. Retrieved March 24, 2018, www.conicyt.cl.
Cruz-Ramírez, M., Escalona-Reyes, M., Cabrera-García, S., & Martínez-Cepena, M. C. (2014). Análisis cienciométrico de las publicaciones educacionales cubanas en la WoS y Scopus (2003–2012). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 37(3), 1–15.
Degenee, A., & Forse, M. (1999). Introducing social networks. London: Sage.
Dehdarirad, T., Villarroya, A., & Barrios, M. (2015). Research on women in science and higher education: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(3), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1574-x.
Ding, Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 187–203.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: a study in the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
Gaskell, J. (2013). Reflections on women and success in the academy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(4), 615–621.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: beyond self and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grosz, E. (2010). The practice of feminist theory. Differences—A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 21(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2009-019.
Guzman-Valenzuela, C., & Munoz-Garcia, A. L. (2018). Decolonizing international collaborative work: creating new grammars for academic partnerships in Chile. In L. Gornall, B. Thomas, & L. Sweetman (Eds.), Exploring Consensual Leadership in Higher Education: Co-operation, Collaboration and Partnership (pp. 171–190). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
Jaksztat, S. (2017). Gender and research productivity. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 46(5), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1019.
Jiang, Y. (2008). Locating active actors in the scientific collaboration communities based on interaction topology analyses. Scientometrics, 74(3), 471–482.
Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2017). National ties of international scientific collaboration and researcher mobility found in nature and science. Scientometrics, 110(2), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2183-z.
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00917-1.
Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage.
Kim, D. H., & Bak, H. J. (2017). Incentivizing research collaboration using performance-based reward systems. Science and Public Policy, 44(2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw050.
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251–263.
Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Larivière, V., Vignola-Gagné, E., Villeneuve, C., Gélinas, P., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Quebec university professors. Scientometrics, 87(3), 483–498.
Lather, P. (2009). Getting lost: feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 30(1), 222–230.
Leahey, E., Crockett, J. L., & Hunter, L. A. (2008). Gendered academic careers: specializing for success? Social Forces, 86(3), 1273–1309.
Loan-Clarke, J., & Preston, D. (2002). Tensions and benefits in collaborative research involving a university and another organization. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 169–185.
Lutter, M., & Schroder, M. (2016). Who becomes a tenured professor, and why? Panel data evidence from German sociology, 1980–2013. Research Policy, 45(5), 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.019.
Maldonado-Maldonado, A. (2009). Latin American higher education: hope in the struggle. In D. Palfreyman & T. Tapper (Eds.), Structuring mass higher education: the role of elite institutions (pp. 73–94). New York: Routledge.
Mattessich, P. W., & Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration: what makes it work. A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. St. Paul: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
McDowell, J. M., Singell, L. D., & Stater, M. (2006). Two to tango? Gender differences in the decisions to publish and coauthor. Economic Inquiry, 44(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbi065.
McNeely, C. L., & Vlaicu, S. (2010). Exploring institutional hiring trends of women in the U.S. STEM professoriate. Review of Policy Research, 27(6), 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00471.x.
Morley, L. (2007). Sister-matic: gender mainstreaming in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5/6), 607–620.
Muijs, D., Ainscow, M., Chapman, C., & West, M. (2011). Collaboration and networking in education. Dordrecht: Springer.
OECD. (2017). The pursuit of gender equality: an uphill battle. Retrieved March 24, 2018, http://www.ungei.org/OECD_2017_The_Pursuit_of_Gender_Equality_book_2017.pdf.
O'Meara, J., & Spittle, M. (2012). Internationalising education: global perspectives on collaboration and change. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Pao, M. L. (1992). Global and local collaborators: a study of scientific collaboration. Information Processing and Management, 28(1), 99–109.
Prpic, K. (2002). Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics, 55(1), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016046819457.
Rivera, L. A. (2017). When two bodies are (not) a problem: gender and relationship status discrimination in academic hiring. American Sociological Review, 82(6), 1111–1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417739294.
Sakamoto, R., & Chapman, D. W. (2011). Cross-border partnerships in higher education: strategies and issues. New York: Routledge.
Savigny, H. (2014). Women, know your limits: cultural sexism in academia, 26(7), 794–809. Gender and Education, 26(7), 794–809.
Schaeffer, D. (2001). Feminism and liberalism reconsidered: the case of Catharine MacKinnon. The American Political Science Review, 95(3), 699–708.
Schensul, J. J., LeCompte, M. D., Trotter, R. T., Cromley, E. K., & Singer, M. (1999). Mapping social networks, spatial data, and hidden populations. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: a handbook. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Scott, J., & Carrington, P. J. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. London: Sage.
Sheridan, J., Savoy, J. N., Kaatz, A., Lee, Y. G., Filut, A., & Carnes, M. (2017). Write more articles, get more grants: the impact of department climate on faculty research productivity. Journal of Womens Health, 26(5), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6022.
Sidhu, R., Rajashekhar, P., Lavin, V. L., Parry, J., Attwood, J., Holdcroft, A., & Sanders, D. S. (2009). The gender imbalance in academic medicine: a study of female authorship in the United Kingdom. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 102(8), 337–342.
SIES. (2008). Informe personal académico 2008. Retrieved October 6, 2018, http://www.mifuturo.cl/index.php/informes-sies/academicos.
SIES. (2017a). Informe personal académico 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2018, http://www.mifuturo.cl/index.php/informes-sies/academicos.
SIES. (2017b). Informe de Matrícula 2017 en Educación Superior. Retrieved March 24, 2018, http://www.mifuturo.cl/index.php/informes-sies/matriculados.
Smith, J. L., Handley, I. M., Zale, A. V., Rushing, S., & Potvin, M. A. (2015). Now hiring! Empirically testing a three-step intervention to increase faculty gender diversity in STEM. Bioscience, 65(11), 1084–1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv138.
Tao, Y., Hong, W., & Ma, Y. (2017). Gender differences in publication productivity among academic scientists and engineers in the US and China: similarities and differences. Minerva, 55(4), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9320-6.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). R-words: refusing research. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223–248). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
UNESCO. (2017). Rendir cuentas en el ámbito de la educación: Cumplir nuestros compromisos. Retrieved June 6, 2018, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002610/261016S.pdf.
UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO eAtlas of gender inequality in education. Retrieved June 6, 2018 https://tellmaps.com/uis/gender/#!/tellmap/79054752/5.
Valian, V. (2005). Beyond gender schemas: improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20(3), 198–213.
van den Besselaar, P., & Sandstrom, U. (2015). Early career grants, performance, and careers: a study on predictive validity of grant decisions. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 826–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.011.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winslow, S., & Davis, S. N. (2016). Gender inequality across the academic life course. Sociology Compass, 10(5), 404–416.
Wright, H. R., Cooper, L., & Luff, P. (2017). Women’s ways of working: circumventing the masculine structures operating within and upon the university. Womens Studies International Forum, 61, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.11.006.
Funding
The writing of this article was supported by the International Network for Early Researchers Fund #REDI170106, granted by the Chilean National Commission of Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT). The ideas expressed are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Queupil, J.P., Muñoz-García, A.L. The role of women scholars in the Chilean collaborative educational research: a social network analysis. High Educ 78, 115–131 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0333-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0333-3