Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 77, Issue 6, pp 995–1013 | Cite as

Students and university websites—consumers of corporate brands or novices in the academic community?

  • Predrag LažetićEmail author
Article

Abstract

The research within this paper compares the positioning of students and corporate branding features on higher education institution websites within the higher education systems of Denmark, England, Germany, Ireland, Spain and Poland. The selection of countries reflects among other things different governance regimes. The paper first outlines the analytical framework used for content analysis of the extent to which evidence of the marketization of higher education is present on higher education institutions’ websites—especially with regard to the positioning and construction of student applicants. Secondly, it uses MANOVA to explain the variance by country and institutional type in relation to the presence (or absence) of different website features. Analysis of higher education institutions’ websites confirms the initial expectations about the link between market-driven higher education governance structures and constructions of students as customers. Nevertheless, the variance in these overall trends is high. Despite the presence of corporate-style features on the higher education institution websites and the linked understanding of students as customers, the between-country and within-country differences reveal also sometimes even more dominant alternative understandings of students and student applicants. In the systems with more academic self-governance or with a state-centred mode of governance (usually mixed together like in Germany, Spain or the state sector in Poland), students are seen either as novices in the academic community or recipients of public service. The empirical findings presented in this article suggest that there is considerable diversity in the portrayal of student applicants on higher education institution websites in Europe, rather than a common construction as only consumers.

Keywords

Higher education University websites Students Europe Marketisation 

Notes

Funding information

This project received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (through a Consolidator Grant awarded to Rachel Brooks, grant number 681018—EUROSTUDENTS).

Supplementary material

10734_2018_315_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (15 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 14 kb)

References

  1. Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres—the international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertelsen, E. (1998). The real transformation: the marketisation of higher education. Social Dynamics, 24(2), 130–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks, R. (2017). Understanding higher education student in Europe: a comparative analysis Compare. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 0(0), 1–18.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R., & Carasso, H. (2013). Everything for sale?: the marketisation of UK higher education. Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Callahan, E. (2005). Cultural similarities and differences in the design of university web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 239–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Boer, H. F., & File, J. M. (2009). Higher education governance reforms across Europe. (Lifelong Learning Project; no. 142354-LLP-1-2008-BE-ERASMUS-ENW). Brussels: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).Google Scholar
  7. Deem, R., Hillyard S., and Reed M.. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: the changing management of UK universities. OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education, 62(5), 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2017). National student fee and support systems in European higher education – 2017/18. Eurydice facts and figures. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  10. Eurydice. (2008). Higher education governance in Europe. In Policies, structures funding and academic staff. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  11. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325.Google Scholar
  13. Gottschall, K., & Saltmarsh, S. (2016). ‘You’re not just learning it, you’re living it!’ Constructing the ‘good life’ in Australian university online promotional videos. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(5), 768–781.Google Scholar
  14. Hite, N. G., & Railsback, B. (2010). Analysis of the content and characteristics of university websites with implications for web designers and educators. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 107–113.Google Scholar
  15. Hoang, T. V. Y., & Rojas-Lizana, I. (2015). Promotional discourse in the websites of two Australian universities: a discourse analytic approach. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1011488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huisman, J., de Boer H., Dill D. D., and Souto-Otero M.. 2016. The Palgrave international handbook of higher education policy and governance. Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Kwiek, M. and Maassen P. (2012). National Higher Education Reforms in a European context: comparative reflections on Poland and Norway. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  18. Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2009). A feminised future? Gender and the changing face of higher education. London: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Marginson, S., et al. (2010). International student security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mautner, G. (2005). The entrepreneurial university: a discursive profile of a higher education buzzword. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(2), 95–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283540.
  21. Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the market society: critical reflections on discourse and dominance. Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: the marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287.Google Scholar
  23. Saichaie, K. (2011). Representation on college and university websites: an approach using critical discourse analysis. University of Iova, Theses and Dissertations, May. https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1071. Accessed 24 Sept 2018.
  24. Santiago, P., Brunner, J., Haug, G., Malo, S., & Di Pietrogiacomo, P. (2009). Spain - OECD review of tertiary education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
  25. Tomlinson, M. (2017). Students’ perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 450–467.Google Scholar
  26. Zhang, Y., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2013). Toward a global knowledge enterprise: University websites as portals to the ongoing marketization of higher education. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 468–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations