Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 77, Issue 5, pp 777–797 | Cite as

The determinants of academic salaries in Russia

  • Ilya PrakhovEmail author
Article

Abstract

The system of higher education in Russia, as in many other countries, is in the midst of reforms related to the global trends of globalization and transformation to a knowledge economy. In order to successfully respond to these global challenges, it is necessary to improve the quality of the university sector and rethink the role of professors in enhancing academic productivity. A 20-year period of recession after the collapse of the Soviet Union has led to a diversification of universities and teachers and resulted in both a sharp fall in academic salaries and a decline in the attractiveness of the academic profession. Since the professoriate constitutes the main source of academic productivity, this article assesses the consequences of the decline in the academic sector before the start of major reforms of academic salaries. Using the data from the ‘The Changing Academic Profession’ project (CAP-Russia 2012 subsample), we identified and evaluated the activities of the professoriate that determine the income of university staff. The results show that, in general, the number of publications positively affected academic salaries, but for certain indicators of research activity, the effects are ambiguous. Administrative duties are important for academic salaries, with a positive effect ranging from 15 to 51%. Seniority also has a positive impact on a professor’s salary. The most consistent results in the pre-reform period were obtained for National research universities (NRUs), where academic salaries are determined by research activity (articles in academic journals) and administrative duties. Salaries rise with seniority, which corresponds to the human capital theory (as well as alternative theories). Salaries in NRUs also reflect gender equality. The results of the study can be used to assess the consequences of the recession in the academic sector in Russia and as a baseline for analyzing current reforms in universities.

Keywords

Academic salary Academic salaries Academic contracts Teaching Research Administration 

JEL classification

I21 I23 J31 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Ulrich Teichler and William Cummings for granting me access to the Changing Academic Profession database. I am also grateful to the participants of the 4th International Conference on Academic Profession in Knowledge Society (Seoul, 2016) and to my colleagues from Center for Institutional Studies Anna Panova and Maria Yudkevich for their valuable comments on the earlier version of the paper.

References

  1. Altbach, Philip G., ed. 2012. Paying the professoriate: A global comparison of compensation and contracts. Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305.Google Scholar
  3. Altbach, Philip G., Liz Reisberg, and Iván F. Pacheco. 2012. “Academic Remuneration and contracts”, in Paying the professoriate: A global comparison of compensation and contracts P. 3–20.Google Scholar
  4. Altbach, P. G., Yudkevich, M., & Rumbley, L. E. (2015). Academic inbreeding: Local challenge, global problem. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 317–330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9391-8.Google Scholar
  5. Altbach, Philip G., Liz Reisberg, and Hans de Wit, eds. 2017. Responding to Massification: Differentiation in postsecondary education worldwide. Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Androuschak, Gregory, and Maria Yudkevich. 2012a. “Quantitative analysis: Looking for commonalities in a sea of differences”, in: Paying the Professoriate: A Global Comparison of Compensation and Contracts / Ed. by P. G. Altbach, L. Reisberg, M. M. Yudkevich, G. V. Androuschak, I. Pacheco. L. : Routledge. Ch. 2. P. 21–34.Google Scholar
  7. Androuschak, Gregory, and Maria Yudkevich. 2012b. “Russian higher education: Salaries and contracts”, in: Paying the Professoriate: A Global Comparison of Compensation and Contracts / Ed. by P. G. Altbach, L. Reisberg, M. M. Yudkevich, G. V. Androuschak, I. Pacheco. L. : Routledge. Ch. 25. P. 265–278.Google Scholar
  8. Arimoto, Akira. 2009. “Changing academic profession in the world from 1992 to 2007”, in: Report of the Hiroshima International Seminar on Higher Education. Vol. 13. URL: http://rihejoho.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/pdf/100132.pdf#page=10.
  9. Barbezat, D. A. (2002). History of pay equity studies. New Directions for Institutional Research, 115, 9–40.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.52.Google Scholar
  10. Bratsberg, B., Ragan Jr., J. F., & Warren, J. T. (2003). Negative returns to seniority: New evidence in academic markets. ILR Review, 56(2), 306–323.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390305600206.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, B. W., & Woodbury, S. A. (1998). Seniority, external labor markets, and faculty pay. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38(4), 771–798.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(99)80132-X.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, P., Lauder, H., Ashton, D., Yingje, W., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2008). Education, globalisation and the future of the knowledge economy. European Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 131–156.Google Scholar
  13. Diamond Jr., A. M. (1986). What is a citation worth? Journal of Human Resources, 21(2), 200–215.  https://doi.org/10.2307/145797.Google Scholar
  14. Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2009). Higher education policies in central and Eastern Europe: Convergence toward a common model? Governance, 22(3), 397–430.Google Scholar
  15. Eckes, S. E., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2006). Legal issues and statistical approaches to reverse pay discrimination in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 47(8), 957–984.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9022-7.Google Scholar
  16. Fairweather, J. S. (1993). Faculty reward structures: Toward institutional and professional homogenization. Research in Higher Education, 34(5), 603–623.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991922.Google Scholar
  17. Froumin, I. (2013). “Mass Distribution of Higher Education in BRIC Countries.” in: Federal reference book. Education in Russia. Vol. 9. Moscow: Publishing Center "President", 2013. P.: 203–212. (in Russian) URL: https://www.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/lib/data/access/ram/ticket/86/1527413247a168b672a566725d123419c96dd9e909/Frumin.pdf.
  18. George, E. S. (2006). Positioning higher education for the knowledge based economy. Higher Education, 52(4), 589–610.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-0955-0.
  19. Gokhberg L., and Kuznetsova T. 2010. Russian Federation, in: UNESCO Science Report: the Current Status of Science around the World. P. 215–234. URL: http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/unesco-science-report-towards-2030-part1.pdf.
  20. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 921–955.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256535.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, L. W., Weisbrod, B. A., & Strauss, R. P. (1978). Modeling the Earnings and Research Productivity of Academic Economists. Journal of Political Economy, 86(4), 729–741 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1840387.Google Scholar
  22. Ivakhnyuk, I. 2006. Brain drain from Russia: In search for a solution. Brain Drain or Brain Gain–A Global Dilemma.Google Scholar
  23. Katz, D. A. (1973). Faculty Salaries, Promotions, and Productivity at a Large University. The American Economic Review, 63(3), 469–477 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914379.Google Scholar
  24. Kogan, M., & Teichler, U. (2007). Key challenges to the academic profession. Kassel: Jenior.Google Scholar
  25. Korobkov, A. V., & Zaionchkovskaia, Z. A. (2012). Russian brain drain: Myths v. Reality. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45(3–4), 327–341.Google Scholar
  26. Kwiek, M. (2001a). Social and cultural dimensions of the transformation of higher education in central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 26(3), 399–410.Google Scholar
  27. Kwiek, Marek. 2001b. “The Internationalization and Globalization of Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe.” Society for Research into Higher Education International News, 47.Google Scholar
  28. Kwiek, M. (2012). Changing higher education policies: From the deinstitutionalization to the reinstitutionalization of the research mission in polish universities. Science and Public Policy, 39(5), 641–654.Google Scholar
  29. Kwiek, M. (2015). Academic generations and academic work: Patterns of attitudes, behaviors, and research productivity of polish academics after 1989. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8), 1354–1376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1060706.Google Scholar
  30. Kwiek, M. (2016). The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 71, 379–397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9910-x.Google Scholar
  31. Kwiek, Marek. 2017a. “Academic top earners. Research productivity, prestige generation, and salary patterns in European universities.” Science and Public Policy. 1–13. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx020.
  32. Kwiek, M. (2017b). A generational divide in the polish academic profession. A mixed quantitative and qualitative approach. European Educational Research Journal, 17, 1–26.Google Scholar
  33. Kwiek, Marek, & Szadkowski, K. 2018. Higher education systems and institutions, Poland. Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions.Google Scholar
  34. Marginson, S. (2010). Higher education in the global knowledge economy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 6962–6980.Google Scholar
  35. Melguizo, T., & Strober, M. H. (2007). Faculty salaries and the maximization of prestige. Research in Higher Education, 48(6), 633–668.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9045-0.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, W. J., Newman, R. J., & Turnbull, G. K. (1998). Do academic salaries decline with seniority? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(2), 352–366.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209892.Google Scholar
  37. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.Google Scholar
  38. Perna, L. W. (2001). Sex differences in faculty salaries: A cohort analysis. The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 283–307.  https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2001.0006.Google Scholar
  39. Price, Gregory N., and Laura Razzolini. 2003. “The returns to seniority in the labor market for academic economists.” Unpublished paper. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gregory_Price2/publication/228586749_The_Returns_to_Seniority_in_the_Labor_Market_for_Academic_Economists./links/02e7e518aed9ac33e5000000.pdf.
  40. Ransom, M. R. (1993). Seniority and Monopsony in the Academic Labor Market. The American Economic Review, 83(1), 221–233 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117505.Google Scholar
  41. Rippner, J. A., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2015). The ‘big bang’ in public and private faculty salaries. Journal of Education Finance, 41(2), 103–123.Google Scholar
  42. Scott, P. (2002). Reflections on the reform of higher education in Central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 27(1-2), 137–152.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772022000003288.
  43. Scott, P. (2007). Higher education in central and Eastern Europe. In International handbook of higher education (pp. 423–441). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Siegfried, J. J., & White, K. J. (1973). Teaching and publishing as determinants of academic salaries. The Journal of Economic Education, 4(2), 90–99.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1973.10845367.Google Scholar
  45. Sivak, E., & Yudkevich, M. (2017). The academic profession in Russia’s two capitals: The impact of 20 years of transition. European Educational Research Journal, 16(5), 626–644.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117701142.Google Scholar
  46. Smolentseva, A. (2003). Challenges to the Russian academic profession. Higher Education, 45(4), 391–424.Google Scholar
  47. Teichler, U., Arimoto, A., & Cummings, W. K. (2013). The changing academic profession. Major Findings of a Comparative Survey. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. The national economy of the USSR for 70 years: Jubilee statistics yearbook / Goskomstat of the USSR. – Moscow. Finance and Statistics. 1987.Google Scholar
  49. Toutkoushian, R. K., & Conley, V. M. (2005). Progress for women in academe, yet inequities persist: Evidence from NSOPF: 99. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-6287-6.Google Scholar
  50. Toutkoushian, R. K., Bellas, M. L., & Moore, J. V. (2007). The interaction effects of gender, race, and marital status on faculty salaries. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 572–601.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11772330.Google Scholar
  51. Tuckman, H. P., & Leahey, J. (1975). What is an article worth? The Journal of Political Economy, 83(5), 951–967 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1830080.Google Scholar
  52. Yudkevich, M. (2014). The Russian University: Recovery and rehabilitation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1463–1474.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.949537.Google Scholar
  53. Yudkevich, Maria. 2017. “Diversity and uniformity in the structure of Russian postsecondary education”, in: Responding to Massification: Differentiation in Postsecondary Education Worldwide / Ed. by P. G. Altbach, L. Reisberg, H. de wit. P.: 110–120.Google Scholar
  54. Yudkevich, Maria, Yana Kozmina, Elizaveta Sivak, and Olga Bain. 2013. “The Changing Academic Profession.” Working Paper by NRU Higher School of Economics. Series WP10. URL: https://www.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/document/113800381.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Fellow, International Laboratory for Institutional Analysis of Economic Reforms, Center for Institutional StudiesNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations