Information-seeking behaviour and academic success in higher education: Which search strategies matter for grade differences among university students and how does this relevance differ by field of study?
- 1.4k Downloads
Today, most college students use the Internet when preparing for exams or homework. Yet, research has shown that undergraduates’ information literacy skills are often insufficient. In this paper, we empirically test the relation between information-seeking strategies and grades in university. We synthesise arguments from the literature on information-seeking behaviour and approaches to learning in tertiary education. Building on the distinction between deep- and surface-level learning, we develop a classification of online search strategies and contrast it with traditional information behaviour. Multivariate analyses using a two-wave online survey among undergraduate students at a German university indicate that using advanced online information-seeking strategies is a significant and robust predictor of better grades. However, there are notable differences between subject groups: Traditional information behaviour is still crucial in the humanities. Advanced search strategies are beneficial in all settings, but only one in four students uses these early on, while this share increases to around 50% over the course of studies.
KeywordsInformation-seeking behaviour Approaches to learning Information literacy skills Learning environments Achievement Higher education
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Leibniz ScienceCampus Tuebingen “Informational Environments”.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bernstein, B. B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Brennan, J., Jary, D., Richardson, J. T. E., & Osborne, M. (2010). The social and organisational mediation of university learning. In J. Brennan, R. Edmunds, M. Houston, D. Jary, Y. Lebeau, M. Osborne, & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Improving what is learned at university (pp. 29–42). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Burger, R. (2015). CampusPanel user handbook: Documentation for the student panel of the ScienceCampus Tuebingen (wave ‘b’). Tübingen: Univ. of Tübingen.Google Scholar
- Civilcharran, S., Hughes, M., & Maharaj, M. S. (2015). Uncovering Web search tactics in South African higher education. South African Journal of Information Management, 17(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Lang, V., & Hillmert, S. (2014). CampusPanel user handbook: Documentation for the student panel of the ScienceCampus Tuebingen (wave ‘a’). Tübingen: Univ. of Tübingen.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Weber, H., Hillmert, S., & Rott, K. (2018). Can digital information literacy among undergraduates be improved? Evidence from an experimental study. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449740.