Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 343–358 | Cite as

The prospective shift away from academic career aspirations

  • Brittany EtmanskiEmail author
Article

Abstract

A growing body of research has focused on the employment outcomes of PhD graduates from the USA, but substantially less literature has focused on their aspirations prior to graduation. As tenure-track positions have become increasingly less common, PhD students attending US institutions may have shifted their career aspirations accordingly. Drawing on the U.S. National Research Council’s (NRC) 2006 Assessment of Research Doctoral Programs, this paper assessed whether PhD students’ career aspirations have shifted away from (or been “cooled out” of) academic careers. Females and students in engineering as well as the physical and mathematical sciences were most likely to have shifted their career aspirations away from academia. Further, institutional prestige did not have a significant effect on students’ career aspirations at any level of analyses. Contrary to past research, US PhD students’ academic career aspirations remained relatively static over time, refuting the cooling out hypothesis. The implication of these results suggests that PhD students may shift away from their academic career aspirations at another time point. Therefore, future research would benefit from examining whether these students shift their career aspirations prior to entrance into the PhD program.

Keywords

Doctoral (PhD) students Student aspirations Cooling out hypothesis Employment Academia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Owen Gallupe for his feedback on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (2011). It’s not over yet: the annual report on the economic status of the profession, 2010–11, Retrieved from The American Association of University Professors: https://www.aaup.org/reports-publications/2010-11salarysurvey.
  2. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (2013). Trends in faculty employment status, 1975–2011. Retrieved from The American Association of University Professors: http://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/Faculty_Trends_0.pdf.
  3. Ann, M., Goulden, M., & Frasch, K. (2009). Why graduate students reject the fast track. Academe, 95(1), 11–16.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, D. (2013). Influences to post-graduate career aspirations and attainment in STEM doctoral candidates and recipient (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Syracuse University, Syracuse.Google Scholar
  5. Bedeian, A., Cavazos, D., Hunt, J., & Jaunch, L. (2010). Doctoral degree prestige and the academic marketplace: a study of career mobility within the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 11–25.Google Scholar
  6. Benderly, B. (2017). The sad state of professional development for scientists. Retrieved from Science: http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2017/04/sad-state-professional-development-programs-scientists.
  7. Brewer, D., Gates, S., & Goldman, C. (2001). In pursuit of prestige: strategy and competition in US higher education. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
  8. Buddeberg-Fischer, B., Stamm, M., & Buddeberg, C. (2009). Academic career in medicine—requirements and conditions for successful advancement in Switzerland. BMC Health Services Research, 9(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. (2016). 2015 Update public file. Retrieved from the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/downloads.php.
  10. Cayley, R. (2016). Unpacking professional development for graduate students. Retrieved from University Affairs: https://www.universityaffairs.ca/career-advice/career-advice-article/unpacking-professional-development-graduate-students/.
  11. Clark, B. (1960). The “cooling-out” function in higher education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cognard-Black, A. (2004). Nice work if you can get it: determinants of academic employment and other workplace rewards among new doctorate recipients (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  13. Curtin, N., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. (2016). Mentoring the next generation of faculty: supporting academic career aspirations among doctoral students. Research in Higher Education, 57(6), 714–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danziger, N., & Eden, Y. (2007). Gender-related differences in the occupational aspirations and career-style preferences of accounting students: a cross-sectional comparison between academic school years. Career Development International, 12(2), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ewen, H., Carr, D., & Reynolds, C. (2012). Tomorrow belongs to those who prepare for it today: gerontology doctoral students’ career aspirations. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 33, 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghaffarzadegan, N., Hawley, J., & Desai, A. (2014). Research workforce diversity: the case of balancing national vs. international postdocs in U.S. biomedical research. Systems Research and Behavioral Sciences, 31(12), 301–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibbs, K., & Griffin, K. (2013). What do I want to be with my PHD? The roles of personal values and structural dynamics in shaping the career interests of recent biomedical science PHD graduates. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 711–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. (1952). On cooling the mark out; some aspects of adaption to failure. Psychiatry, 15(4), 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Golde, C., & Dore, T. (2004). The survey of doctoral education and career preparation: the importance of disciplinary contexts. In D. Wulff & A. Austin (Eds.) Paths to the Professoriate: Strategies for the Preparation of Future Faculty (pp. 19–45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Golde, C., & Walker, G. (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline—Carnegie essays on the doctorate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Goldsmith, S., Presley, J., & Cooley, E. (2002). National science foundation graduate research fellowship program: final evaluation report. Retrieved from The WestEd Evaluation Research Program: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02080/start.htm.
  22. Hacker, A., & Dreifus, C. (2010). Higher education? How colleges are wasting our money and failing our kids and what we can do about it. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  23. Haley, K., Jaeger, A., & Levin, J. (2014). The influence of cultural social identity on graduate student career choice. Journal of College Student Development, 55(2), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs, J. (1995). Women’s entry into management. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Gender inequality at work. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. King, D. (2005). Culture, tourism and the centre for education statistics doctoral graduates in Canada: findings from the survey of earned doctorates, 2004/2005. Retrieved from Statistics Canada: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-595-m/81-595-m2008065-eng.htm.
  26. Larson, R., Ghaffarzadegan, N., & Xue, Y. (2014). Too many PhD graduates or too few academic job openings: the basic reproductive number R0 in academia. Systems Research and Behavioral Sciences, 31(6), 745–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manathunga, C., Pitt, R., & Critchley, C. (2009). Graduate attribute development and employment outcomes: tracking PhD graduates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCormick, A., & Zhao, C. (2005). Rethinking and reframing the Carnegie Classification. Change, 37(5), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyers, F., Mathur, A., Fuhrmann, C., O’Brien, T., Wefes, I., Labosky, P., et al. (2016). The origin and implementation of the Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training programs: an NIH common fund initiative. The FASEB Journal, 30(2), 507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Research Council (NRC). (2010a). A data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  31. National Research Council (NRC). (2010b). A revised guide to the methodology of the data- based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  32. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2016). Science and engineering indicators 2016. Retrieved from The National Science Foundation: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/uploads/1/nsb20161.pdf.
  33. Neumann, R., & Tan, K. (2011). From PhD to initial employment: the doctorate in a knowledge economy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 601–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Meara, K. (2007). Striving for what? Exploring the pursuit of prestige. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: handbook of theory and research (Vol. 22, pp. 121–180). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Redd, K. (2007). Data sources: Trends in new Ph.D.s entering academe, 1970 to 2005. Retrieved from The Council of Graduate Schools: http://cgsnet.org/ckfinder/userfiles/files/DataSources_2007_03.pdf.
  36. Rudd, E., Nerad, M., Morrison, E., & Picciano, J. (2008). Professional development for PhD students: do they really need it? Retrieved from The Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education: http://www.education.uw.edu/cirge/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/professional-skills-spotlight_10_07_08.pdf.
  37. Russo, G. (2011). Graduate students: aspirations and anxieties. Nature, 475(7357), 533–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stephan, P. (2012). How economics shapes science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  40. Wood, C., Campbell, P., & McGee, R. (2016). An incredibly steep hill: how gender, race, and class shape perspectives on academic careers among beginning biomedical PhD students. Journal For Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1848(2), pp. 3047–3054.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology & Legal StudiesUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations