Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 195–211 | Cite as

National barriers to the completion of doctoral programs at Russian universities

  • Natalia MaloshonokEmail author
  • Evgeniy Terentev
Article

Abstract

Doctoral education has experienced dramatic changes all over the world in the last three decades. Currently, Russia is at the beginning of a doctoral education transformation to structured programs according to needs of knowledge-based economies. This paper aims to identify national-level barriers to PhD completion in Russian doctoral education. The data from the empirical study in highly selective Russian universities that participate in a special government program were employed. About 40% of all doctoral students participated in the Russian Federation study at these universities. The following problems were revealed and discussed in the research: (1) problems of transition to a structured model of doctoral education, (2) diffusion of doctoral education’s goals, (3) unpreparedness of Russian universities for the massive expansion of PhD education, (4) ineffective mechanisms of doctoral student selection, (5) a lack of funding and a need for doctoral students to have paid work, (6) excessive dependence on supervisors and (7) insufficient study time and skills for meeting the requirement for publications before the date of defence. Some problems correlate with the global challenges, but some are unique to the Russian institutional context. The relevance of the Russian case to understanding the worldwide transformation of the doctorate is discussed.

Keywords

Doctoral programs PhD completion Barriers Project 5-100 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude to Elena Kobzar (Head of the Office of Doctoral Studies, National Research University Higher School of Economics) and Ivan Gruzdev (Director of the Centre for Institutional Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics) for the help in the data collection process and in the administration of the survey.

References

  1. Abedi, J., & Benkin, E. (1987). The effects of students’ academic, financial, and demographic variables on time to the doctorate. Research in Higher Education, 27(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  2. Ahern, K., & Manathunga, C. (2004). Clutch-starting stalled research students. Innovative Higher Education, 28(4), 237–254.Google Scholar
  3. Athey, S., Katz, L. F., Krueger, A. B., Levitt, S., & Poterba, J. (2007). What does performance in graduate school predict? Graduate economics education and student outcomes. The American Economic Review, 97(2), 512–518.Google Scholar
  4. Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2005). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: a meta-synthesis of research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: handbook of theory and research (pp. 481–534). Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, J. G. (1998). Gender, race and Ph. D. completion in natural science and engineering. Economics of Education Review, 17(2), 179–188.Google Scholar
  6. Bao, Y., Kehm, B. M., & Ma, Y. (2018). From product to process. The reform of doctoral education in Europe and China. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 524–541.Google Scholar
  7. Bednyi, B. I., & Mironos, A. A. (2008). Podgotovka nauchnykh kadrov v vyschey shkole. Nizhniy Novgorod: Sostoyanie i tendentsii razvitiya aspirantury.Google Scholar
  8. Bekova, S., Gruzdev, I., Jafarova, Z., Maloshonok, N., & Terentev, E. (2017). Portret sovremennogo rossiyskogo aspiranta [The portrait of Russian doctoral student]. Sovremennaya Analitika Obrazovaniya [Contemporary Education Analytics], 7(15), 1–60.Google Scholar
  9. Booth, A. L., & Satchell, S. E. (1995). The hazards of doing a PhD—an analysis of completion and withdrawal rates of British PhD students in the 1980s. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society, 158, 297–318.Google Scholar
  10. Boud, D., & Lee, A. (Eds.). (2009). Changing practices of doctoral education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the PhD. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cave, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education: the challenge of the quality movement. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, B. R. (Ed.). (1993). The research foundations of graduate education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: a case of accumulative disadvantage? The Journal of Higher Education, 57, 20–43.Google Scholar
  15. Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). The PhD factory. Nature, 472(7343), 276.Google Scholar
  16. Ehrenberg, R. G., Jakubson, G. H., Groen, J. A., So, E., & Price, J. (2007). Inside the black box of doctoral education: what program characteristics influence doctoral students’ attrition and graduation probabilities? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(2), 134–150.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, E. M. (2001). The impact of race and gender on graduate school socialization, satisfaction with doctoral study, and commitment to degree completion. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 25, 30–45.Google Scholar
  18. Enders, J. (2004). Research training and careers in transition: a European perspective on the many faces ofthe PhD. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(3), 419–429.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, T., & Kamler, B. (2005). The need for counter-scrutiny: taking a broad view of doctoral education research. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(2), 115–118.Google Scholar
  20. Fox, M. A. (1997). Graduate students: too many and too narrow? In R. Ehrenberg (Ed.), The American university: national treasure or endangered species? (pp. 100–114). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Froumin, I., Kouzminov, Y., & Semyonov, D. (2014). Institutional diversity in Russian higher education: revolutions and evolution. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 209–234.Google Scholar
  22. Gardner, S. K. (2008). ‘What’s too much and what’s too little?’: the process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79, 326–350.Google Scholar
  23. Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education, 58(1), 97–112.Google Scholar
  24. Gardner, S. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low-completing departments: a qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81.Google Scholar
  25. Gellert, C. (1993). The German model of research and advanced education. In B. R. Clark (Ed.), The research foundations of graduate education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan (pp. 5–44). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Geven, K., Skopek, J., & Triventi, M. (2017). How to increase PhD completion rates? An impact evaluation of two reforms in a selective graduate school, 1976–2012. Research in Higher Education, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9481-z.
  27. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Gilbert, R., Balatti, J., Turner, P., & Whitehouse, H. (2004). The generic skills debate in research higher degrees. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 375–388.Google Scholar
  29. Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163–189.Google Scholar
  30. Gokhberg, L. M., & Sagieva, G. S. (2007). Rossiyskaya nauka: bibliometricheskie indicatory. Foresight, 1(1), 44–53.Google Scholar
  31. Golde, C. M. (2001). Questions to ask when thinking about pursuing a Ph.D. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  32. Green, B. (2009). Challenging perspectives, changing practices. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 239–248). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Green, H., & Powell, S. (2007). Introduction. In S. Powell & H. Green (Eds.), The doctorate worldwide. Berkshire: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gumport, P. J. (1993). Graduate education and organised research in the United States. In B. R. Clark (Ed.), The research foundations of graduate education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan (pp. 225–260). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hagedorn, L. S., & Nora, A. (1996). Rethinking admissions criteria in graduate and professional programs. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996(92), 31–44.Google Scholar
  36. Halse, C. (2007). Is the doctorate in crisis? Nagoya. Journal of Higher Education, 7, 321–337.Google Scholar
  37. Hunter, K. H., & Devine, K. (2016). Doctoral students’ emotional exhaustion and intentions to leave academia. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 35–61.Google Scholar
  38. Jiranek, V. (2010). Potential predictors of timely completion among dissertation research students at an Australian faculty of sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  39. Johnes, G., & McNabb, R. (2004). Never give up on the good times: student attrition in the UK. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(1), 23–47.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, M. S. (2008). Historical legacies of Soviet higher education and the transformation of higher education systems in post-Soviet Russia and Eurasia. The Worldwide Transformation of Higher Education, 9, 159–176.Google Scholar
  41. Juniper, B., Walsh, E., Richardson, A., & Morley, B. (2012). A new approach to evaluating the well-being of PhD research students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 563–576.Google Scholar
  42. Kearns, H., Gardiner, M., & Marshall, K. (2008). Innovation in PhD completion: the hardy shall succeed (and be happy!). Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 77–89.Google Scholar
  43. Kehm, B. M. (2006). Doctoral education in Europe and North America: a comparative analysis. Wenner Gren International Series, 83, 67.Google Scholar
  44. Kemp, D. A. (1999). Knowledge and innovation: a policy statement on research and research training. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  45. Kyvik, S., & Olsen, T. B. (2014). Increasing completion rates in Norwegian doctoral training: multiple causes for efficiency improvements. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9), 1668–1682.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, A. (2012). Successful research supervision. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, A., Brennan, M., & Green, B. (2009). Re-imagining doctoral education: professional doctorates and beyond. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 275–287.Google Scholar
  48. Lott, J., Gardner, S. K., & Powers, D. A. (2009). Doctoral student attrition in the STEM fields: an exploration of event history analysis. The Journal of College Student Retention, 11, 247–266.Google Scholar
  49. Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Being a good course-taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 137–154.Google Scholar
  50. Maloshonok, N. (2016). Doctoral students’ reasons to pursue a PhD as a cause of low completion rate of Russian PhD programs. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 3(9), 18–20.Google Scholar
  51. Nerad, M. (2004). The PhD in the US: criticisms, facts, and remedies. Higher Education Policy, 17(2), 183–199.Google Scholar
  52. Nerad, M. (2006). Globalization and its impact on research education: trends and emerging best practices for the doctorate of the future. Quality in postgraduate research: knowledge creation in testing times (pp. 5–12). Canberra: ANU.Google Scholar
  53. Nerad, M. (2010). Increase in PhD production and reform of doctoral education worldwide. Research Institute for Higher Education Hiroshima University, 7, 769.Google Scholar
  54. Nerad, M., & Evans, B. (Eds.). (2014). Globalization and its impacts on the quality of PhD education: forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  55. Nettles, M. T. (1990). Success in doctoral programs: experiences of minority and white students. American Journal of Education, 98(4), 494–522.Google Scholar
  56. Neumann, R., & Tan, K. K. (2011). From PhD to initial employment: the doctorate in a knowledge economy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 601–614.Google Scholar
  57. Noble, K. (1994). Changing doctoral degrees: an international perspective. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Park, C. (2005). New variant PhD: the changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189–207.Google Scholar
  59. Pearson, M. (2005). Framing research on doctoral education in Australia in a global context. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 119–134.Google Scholar
  60. Pearson, M., Evans, T., & Macauley, P. (2008). Growth and diversity in doctoral education: assessing the Australian experience. Higher Education, 55(3), 357–372.Google Scholar
  61. Powell, S., & Green, H. (2007). The doctorate worldwide. Berkshire: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Price, J. (2006). Does a spouse slow you down?: Marriage and graduate student outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  63. Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: a study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. ISRN Education, 2012.Google Scholar
  64. Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–150.Google Scholar
  65. Ray, M., Garavalia, L., & Murdock, T. (2003). Aptitude, motivation, and self-regulation as predictors of achievement among developmental college students. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 20(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
  66. Rhoads, R. A., Zheng, M., & Sun, X. (2017). The methodological socialization of social science doctoral students in China and the USA. Higher Education, 73(2), 335–351.Google Scholar
  67. Rigg, J., Day, J., & Adler, H. (2013). Emotional exhaustion in graduate students: the role of engagement, self-efficacy and social support. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3(2), 138.Google Scholar
  68. Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Spaulding, L. S., & Bade, B. (2014). Completion of educational doctorates: how universities can foster persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 293–309.Google Scholar
  69. Rothstein, M. G., Paunonen, S. V., Rush, J. C., & King, G. A. (1994). Personality and cognitive ability predictors of performance in graduate business school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 516.Google Scholar
  70. Sadlak, J. (Ed.). (2004). Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the United States: status and prospects. Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.Google Scholar
  71. Smolentseva, A. (2003). Challenges to the Russian academic profession. Higher Education, 45(4), 391–424.Google Scholar
  72. Spaulding, L. S., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2012). Hearing their voices: factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 199–219.Google Scholar
  73. Spronken-Smith, R., Cameron, C., & Quigg, R. (2018). Factors contributing to high PhD completion rates: a case study in a research-intensive university in New Zealand. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 94–109.Google Scholar
  74. Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2011). Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 33–50.Google Scholar
  75. Van Ours, J. C., & Ridder, G. (2003). Fast track or failure: a study of the graduation and dropout rates of PhD students in economics. Economics of Education Review, 22(2), 157–166.Google Scholar
  76. Wao, H. O., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). A mixed research investigation of factors related to time to the doctorate in education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 115–134.Google Scholar
  77. Welsh, I. M. (1980) The postgraduate student: progress and problems, PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  78. Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  79. Wright, T., & Cochrane, R. (2000). Factors influencing successful submission of PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 181–195.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Institute of EducationNational Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)MoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.Centre for Institutional ResearchNational Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)MoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations