Higher Education

, Volume 76, Issue 6, pp 937–955 | Cite as

An examination of the relationship between Facebook groups attached to university courses and student engagement

  • Nicola SheeranEmail author
  • Daniel J. Cummings


Educators and researchers are increasingly interested in the benefits of using Facebook groups attached to university courses, largely around connectedness, engagement and sense of belonging. However, thus far, there have been no broad-scale investigations on the potential outcomes of course-attached Facebook groups. The current study used both within- and between-group analyses on 471 participants, in order to investigate whether courses with an attached official or unofficial Facebook group was related to increased student engagement (in the categories of relationships with faculty members, peer relationships, behavioural engagement, cognitive engagement, valuing and a sense of belonging) and degree identity compared to courses without Facebook groups. Results indicated that students reported interacting more with unofficial than official Facebook groups. Courses with an official Facebook group had significantly greater staff connectedness compared to courses without an official Facebook group, while courses with either an official or unofficial Facebook group had a significantly higher peer relationships compared to courses without any Facebook group. Students with either an official or unofficial Facebook group had a significantly higher sense of belonging. Though students with either an official or unofficial Facebook group reported higher degree identity, this may be primarily due to the unofficial, rather than official Facebook groups; this difference may only exist in the unofficial, but not the official Facebook groups.


Facebook Engagement Connectedness Identity Belonging 


  1. Aydin, S. (2012). A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1093–1106. Scholar
  2. Barczyk. (2013). Facebook in higher education courses: an analysis of students' attitudes, community of practice, and classroom community. International Business and Management, 6(1), 1–11. Scholar
  3. Brooks, D. C. (2015). ECAR study of faculty and information technology, 2015. Retrieved from Louisville, CO:
  4. Celik, I., Akilli, G. K., & Onuk, T. C. (2014). Social media for academics: motivation killer or booster? Paper presented at the IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens.Google Scholar
  5. Clements, J. C. (2015). Using Facebook to enhance independent student engagement: a case study of first-year undergraduates. Higher Education. Studies, 5(4), 131–146. Scholar
  6. DiVall, M. V., & Kirwin, J. L. (2012). Using Facebook to facilitate course-related discussion between students and faculty members. American Journal of Phrmaceuritcal Education, 76(2), 1–5. Scholar
  7. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436. Scholar
  8. Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhard, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Retrieved from
  9. Dyson, B., Vickers, K., Turtle, J., Cowan, S., & Tassone, A. (2015). Evaluating the use of Facebook to increase student engagement and understanding in lecture-based classes. Higher Education, 69(2), 303–313. Scholar
  10. Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Sense of belonging in colelge freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 203–220. Scholar
  11. Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2014). Student engagement scale: development, reliability and validity. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587–610. Scholar
  12. Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2015). Confirmation of campus-class-technology model in student engagement: a path analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 114–125. Scholar
  13. Hausmann, L. R. M., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and white first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803–839. Scholar
  14. Hung, H.-T., & Yuen, S. C.-Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703–714. Scholar
  15. Hurt, N. E., Moss, G., Bradley, C., Larson, L., Lovelace, M., Prevost, L., et al. (2012). The ‘Facebook’ effect: college students' perceptions of online discussions in the age of social networking. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1–24. Scholar
  16. Imlawi, J., Gregg, D., & Karimi, J. (2015). Student engagement in course-based social networks: the impact of instructor credibility and use of communication. Computers & Education, 88, 84–96. Scholar
  17. Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012). Students perceptions of using Facebook as interactive learning resources. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221–1232. Scholar
  18. Ivala, E., & Gachago, D. (2012). Social media for enhancing student engagement: the use of Facebook and blogs at a university of technology. South African Journal of Higher Education, 26(1), 152–167.Google Scholar
  19. Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers and Education, 58(1), 162–171. Scholar
  20. Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: an online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187. Scholar
  21. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. Scholar
  22. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12. Scholar
  23. Lam, L. (2012). An innovative research on the usage of Facebook in the higher education context of Hong Kong. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(4), 378–386.Google Scholar
  24. Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 503–528. Scholar
  25. McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729–740. Scholar
  26. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238. Scholar
  27. Piotrowski, C. (2015). Pedagogical applications of social media in business education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(3), 257–265. Scholar
  28. Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: a comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140. Scholar
  29. Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—a literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60–A68. Scholar
  30. Trowler, V., & Trowler, P. (2010). Student engagement evidence summary. Department of Educational Research, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied PsychologyMt. Gravatt Campus, Griffith UniversityMt. GravattAustralia

Personalised recommendations