Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 163–181 | Cite as

Students’ self-worth protection and approaches to learning in higher education: predictors and consequences

  • Francisco Cano
  • Andrew J. Martin
  • Paul Ginns
  • A. B. G. Berbén
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test a process model of students’ learning in higher education, linking anxiety, course experience (positive and negative), self-worth protection (SWP) (self-handicapping, defensive expectations, reflectivity), student approach to learning (SAL) (deep/surface), and achievement. Path and bootstrap analyses of data from 899 first-year university students showed that anxiety significantly predicted all SWP strategies and that positive course experience negatively predicted defensive expectations, whereas negative course experience was linked to higher levels of self-handicapping and reflectivity. Deep approach was linked negatively to self-handicapping and positively to reflectivity, whereas surface approach was associated positively with both self-handicapping and defensive expectations. Finally, deep approach positively predicted achievement and partially mediated the effect of self-handicapping on achievement. These findings support the validity of linking SWP with SAL and demonstrate meaningful connections between these and the anxiety and course experience of students. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Self-handicapping Defensive pessimism Motivation Learning approaches Academic achievement Higher education 

References

  1. Alter, A. L., & Forgas, J. P. (2007). On being happy but fearing failure: the effects of mood on self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(6), 947–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. B. (2001). Enhancing learning: a matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73–102). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, D. W., & Cantor, N. (1989). Personality psychology: recent trend and emerging directions. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cemen, P. B. (1987). The nature of mathematics anxiety. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
  9. Clinton, V. (2014). The relationship between students’ preferred approaches to learning and behaviors during learning: an examination of the process stage of the 3P model. Instructional Science, 42(5), 817–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, S. J., & Prosser, M. (1998). University students’ conceptions of mathematics. Studies in Higher Education, 23(1), 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 861–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diseth, Å. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17(2), 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorman, J. P., & Ferguson, J. M. (2004). Associations between students’ perceptions of the mathematics classroom environment and self-handicapping in Australian and Canadian high schools. McGill Journal of Education, 39(1), 69–86.Google Scholar
  15. Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: what have we learned in 60 years? Frontiers in Pychology, 7, 1–16.Google Scholar
  16. Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  17. Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitude scales: instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferradás, M., Freire, C., & Núñez, J. C. (2016a). Self-protection profiles of worth and academic goals in university students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(4), 669–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferradás, M., Freire, C., Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., Regueiro, B., & Vallejo, G. (2016b). The relationship between self-esteem and self-worth protection strategies in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fryer, L. K. (2017). (Latent) transitions to learning at university: a latent profile transition analysis of first-year Japanese students. Higher Education, 73(3), 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gadbois, S. A., & Sturgeon, R. D. (2011). Academic self-handicapping: relationships with learning specific and general self-perceptions and academic performance over time. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Heikkila, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Higgins, R. L., Snyder, C. R., & Berglas, S. (1990). Self-handicapping: the paradox that isn’t. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, E. E., & Berglas, J. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping: the appeal of alcohol and the rate of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(2), 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2013). LISREL 9.1 for Windows. Skokie: Scientific Software International, Inc..Google Scholar
  29. Laird, T. F. N., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, A., & Marsh, H. W. (2003). Fear of failure: friend or foe? Australian Psychologist, 38(1), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2001). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: a model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning—I: outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: a further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norem, J. K., & Cantor, N. (1986). Defensive pessimism: harnessing anxiety as motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1208–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Hazel, E., & Waterhouse, F. (2000). Students’ perceptions of studying physics concepts: the effects of disintegrated perceptions and approaches. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richardson, J. T. E. (2015). Approaches to learning or levels of processing: what did Marton and Säljö (1976a) really say? The legacy of the work of the Göteborg Group in the 1970s. Interchange, 46(3), 239–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwinger, M., Wirthwein, L., Lemmer, G., & Steinmayr, R. (2014). Academic self-handicapping and achievement: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 744–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steele, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas, C. R., & Gadbois, S. A. (2007). Academic self-handicapping: the role of self-concept clarity and students’ learning strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., & Millan, E. S. (2013). Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trujillo, K., & Hadfield, O. (1999). Tracing the roots of mathematics anxiety through in-depth interviews with preservice elementary teachers. College Student Journal, 33(2), 219–232.Google Scholar
  44. Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: what we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zuckerman, M., Kieffer, S. C., & Knee, C. R. (1998). Consequences of self-handicapping: effects on coping, academic performance, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1619–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Cano
    • 1
  • Andrew J. Martin
    • 2
  • Paul Ginns
    • 3
  • A. B. G. Berbén
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Sydney School of Education and Social WorkUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Faculty of EducationUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations