Research groups as communities of practice—a case study of four high-performing research groups
- 916 Downloads
The aim of this paper is to investigate the organization of research in high-performing research groups in an age of increasing competition and pressure from outside and within higher-education institutions. To explore how researchers navigate such pressures and demands, the practice and perceptions of four high-performing research groups in Denmark and the Netherlands are examined, and the extent to which these groups can be understood as “communities of practice” or if they are displaying “team”-like characteristics is discussed. Previous studies have shown the benefits of communities of practice for organizational performance, and the present study demonstrates that the successful groups do indeed share many characteristics with such communities. A central argument of the paper is, however, also that incentive structures, inherent in many new policy initiatives that are meant to foster excellence in science, are more directed at “team-like” organization by focusing on, e.g., formally organized work processes, predefined goals, milestones, work packages, and hierarchically organized consortia. The potential implications of this are discussed.
KeywordsResearch groups Practice Communities of practice Performance
- De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
- de Rijcke, S., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2015). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038.
- Fontaine, M. A., & Millen, D. R. (2004). Understanding the benefits and impact of communities of practice. In P. Hildreth & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks: innovation through communities of practice (pp. 1–13). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Google Scholar
- Langfeldt, L., Benner, M., Sivertsen, G., Kristiansen, E. H., Aksnes, D. W., Borlaug, S. R., Foss Hansen, H., Kallerud, E., & Pelkonen, A. (2015). Excellence and growth dynamics: a comparative study of the Matthew effect. Science and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu083.
- Lave J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
- LSE Impact Blog. (2017)The accelerated academy. Retrieved at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/the-accelerated-academy-series/
- OECD. (2014). Promoting research excellence: new approaches to funding. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Park, J. J., Choe, N. H., Schallert, D. L., & Forbis, A. K. (2017). The chemical engineering research laboratory as context for graduate students’ training: the role of lab structure and cultural climate in collaborative work. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.04.001.
- Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Sørensen, M. P., Bloch, C., & Young, M. (2015). Excellence in the knowledge-based economy: from scientific to research excellence. European Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1015106.
- Storck, J., & Hill, P. A. (2000). Knowledge diffusion through “strategic communities”. In E. L. Lesser, M. A. Fontaine, & J. A. Slusher (Eds.), Knowledge and communities (pp. 65–83). Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Verbree, M., Van der Weijden, I., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Academic leadership of high-performing research groups. Creativity and Leadership in Science, Technology, and Innovation.Google Scholar
- Vostal, F. (2016). Accelerating academia: the changing structure of academic time. Springer.Google Scholar
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, B. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
- Whitley, R. (2014). How do institutional changes affect scientific innovations? The effects of shifts in authority relationships, protected space, and flexibility. In R. Whitley & J. Gläser (eds.) Organizational transformation and scientific change: the impact of institutional restructuring on universities and intellectual innovation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 42)(pp.367–406). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Young, M., Sørensen, M. P., Bloch, C., & Degn, L. (2016, 2016). Systemic rejection: political pressures seen from the science system. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0059-z.