The growth trend in learning strategies during the transition from secondary to higher education in Flanders
- 467 Downloads
As in many OECD countries, the first year in Flemish Higher Education is a major hurdle. Research on the experience of the transition period from secondary to higher education highlights the importance of the change in students’ teaching/learning environment. Though this change is hypothesised to affect students’ learning strategies, and hereby students’ chances of study success, studies examining the change in learning strategies during the transition period are absent. The present research is innovative in the way that it investigates the average and differential growth in learning strategies during the transition from secondary to higher education. All students from 36 secondary schools were logged onto the Inventory of Learning Styles-Short Version, and their progress was tracked over five waves from the beginning of the last year at secondary school to the beginning of their second year at a higher education establishment. Six hundred and thirty students were retained for analysis. Results indicate that students on average increased their self-regulated and deep learning during the transition. The results also showed an increase in students’ degree of analysing and lack of regulation. Furthermore, for all the scales except the memorizing scale, the evolution over time varied from student to student.
KeywordsLearning strategies Growth model Higher education Secondary education
- Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: a structural equation approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2008). Variability and consistency of learning patterns in teacher education. In E. Cools, H. Van den Broeck, C. Evans, & T. Redmond (Eds.), Style and cultural differences: how can organisations, regions and countries take advantages of style differences (pp. 65–74). Gent: Vlerick Leuven Gent management school.Google Scholar
- Duncan, T., Duncan, S., & Strycker, L. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling. Concepts, issues and applications. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hogeronderwijsadministratie (2008). Studiesucces generatiestudenten 2007–2008 [Study success of generation students 2007–2008].Google Scholar
- Marambe, K. (2007). Patterns of student learning in medical education—a Sri Lankan study in a traditional curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Maastricht: University of Maastricht.Google Scholar
- Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (2010). Growth modeling with latent variable using Mplus: Advanced growth models, survival analysis and missing data. Mplus Short Courses.Google Scholar
- OECD (2013). Education at a glance: OECD indicators.Google Scholar
- Segers, M., Nijhuis, J., & Gijselaers, W. (2006). Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: the influence on students’ perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(223–242). doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.08.004.
- Smith, L., Saini, B., Krass, I., Chen, T., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., & Sainsbury, E. (2007). Pharmacy students’ approaches to learning in an Australian university. Am J Pharm Educ, 71(6) Article 120. doi:10.5688/aj7106120.
- Vanthournout, G. (2011). Patterns in student learning: exploring a person-oriented and longitudinal research-perspective (Institute for Education and Information Sciences). Antwerp: Garant.Google Scholar
- Vanthournout, G., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Further understanding learning in higher education: a systematic review on longitudinal research using Vermunt’s learning pattern model. In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning and management: theory, research and practice (pp. 78–96). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Vanthournout, G., Gijbels, D., Coertjens, L., Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Students’ persistence and academic success in a first-year professional bachelor program: the influence of students’ learning strategies and academic motivation. Education Research International . doi:10.1155/2012/152747.Article ID 152747 Google Scholar
- Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data. Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar