Learning challenges in higher education: an analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice
Open education, including the use of open educational resources (OER) and the adoption of open education practice, has the potential to challenge educators to change their practice in fundamental ways. This paper forms part of a larger study focusing on higher education educators’ learning from and through their engagement with OER. The first part of the study was a quantitative survey investigating educators’ learning behaviour when they learned to use OER in their practice. The second part of the study explored qualitatively how educators engaged with OER and how they conceptualised their learning. Data were gathered through interviews with 30 higher education educators. This paper reports the analysis of these interviews. The analysis draws on the theory of self-regulated learning and cultural–historical activity theory to explore the challenges adult education practitioners encounter when changing their practice. The study tests the application of a framework that traces the discursive manifestations of contradictions, exploring how this framework can be used to examine different aspects of self-regulated learning as educators learn how to use OER. We have identified three distinct tensions in higher education educators’ practice: tensions between the emerging needs of the individual (as he or she adopts new forms of practice) and organisational policies; between the transfer of responsibilities from educators to students as new practice is embedded and institutional accountability; and between cost efficiency and learning objectives. The framework for the discursive manifestations of contradictions was a useful tool used to surface these apparent tensions.
KeywordsHigher education educators Open educational resources Self-regulated learning Manifestations of contradictions Change in practice
- Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Banzato, M. (2012). Barriers to teacher educators seeking, creating and sharing open educational resources: An empirical study of the use of OER in education in Italy. In 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
- Beetham, H., Falconer, I., McGill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2012). Open practices: briefing paper. JISC. Retrieved from https://oersynth.pbworks.com/w/page/51668352/OpenPracticesBriefing.
- Cape Town Declaration. (2008). Read the Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/readthe-declaration.
- Conole, G. C., & Ehlers, U. D. (2010). Open educational practices: Unleashing the power of OER. In UNESCO Workshop on OER, Windhoek, Namibia.Google Scholar
- Cox, G. (2016). Explaining the relations between culture, structure and agency in lecturers’ contrivution and non-contribution to Open Educational Resources in a higher education institution. Retrieved from http://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/20300.
- du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ehlers, U. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit.Google Scholar
- Falconer, I., Littlejohn, A., McGill, L., & Beetham, H. (2016). Motives and tensions in the release of Open Educational Resources: the UKOER programme, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.Google Scholar
- Hood, N, & Littlejohn, A. (2016). Knowledge typologies for professional learning: educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice. Educational Technology Research and Development.Google Scholar
- Il’enkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays in its history and theory. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
- Kalliola, S., & Nakari, R. (2006). Rajojen ylittäminen sosiaalisena innovaationa kuntien kehittämistoiminnassa. In P. Jokivuori, R. Latva-Karjanmaa, & A. Ropo (Eds.), Työelämän taitekohtia Työpoliittinen tutkimus 309 (pp. 34–50). Helsinki: Työministeriö.Google Scholar
- Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prence-Hall.Google Scholar
- Littlejohn, A., Falconer, I., McGill, L., & Beetham, H. (2014). Open Networks and Bounded Communities: Tensions Inherent in Releasing Open Educational Resources. In A. Littlejohn & C. Pegler (Eds.), Reusing Open Resources: learning in open networks for work, life and education (pp. 57–69). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2014). Reusing resources: open for learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2014-02/.
- Livingston-Vale, K., & Long, P. (2003). Models for open learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to eLearning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Masterman, L., & Wild, J. (2012). OER impact study: Research Report. JISC Open Educational Resources Programme. Retrieved from http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614114910/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/oer/JISCOERImpactStudyResearchReportv1-0.pdf.
- McAndrew, P. (2011). Inspiring creativity in organisations, teachers and learners through Open Educational Resources. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 14(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
- McGill, L., Beetham, H., Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. (2010). JISC/HE Academy OER Programme: Pilot Phase Synthesis and Evaluation Report. Retrieved from https://OERynth.pbworks.com/w/page/29688444/Pilot%20Phase%20Synthesis%20and%20Evaluation%20Report.
- OECD. (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document/41/0,3746,en_2649_35845581_38659497_1_1_1_1,00.html.
- OPAL. (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus to open educational practices. OPAL Report 2011. Essen, Germany: Open Education Quality Initiative.Google Scholar
- Pereira Querol, M. A. (2011). Learning challenges in biogas production for sustainability: An activity theoretical study of a network from a swine industry chain. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
- Porter, D. A. (2013). Exploring the practices of educators using open educational resources (OER) in the British Columbia higher education system (Doctoral dissertation, Education: Faculty of Education). Retrieved from: http://summit.sfu.ca/item/13663.
- Richter, P., & Cornford, J. (2008). Customer relationship management and citizenship: Technologies and identities in public services. Social Policy and Society, 7(02), 211–220.Google Scholar
- Vainio, J. (2012). Hegemony, contradiction, and gender in the context of Finnish university physics. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open educational resources: A review of the literature. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 781-789). New York: Springer.Google Scholar