Higher Education

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 17–32 | Cite as

‘It’s not fair’: policy discourses and students’ understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university

  • Lee Adam
  • Vivienne Anderson
  • Rachel Spronken-Smith
Article

Abstract

Plagiarism is a concept that is difficult to define. Although most higher education institutions have policies aimed at minimising and addressing student plagiarism, little research has examined the ways in which plagiarism is discursively constructed in university policy documents, or the connections and disconnections between institutional and student understandings of plagiarism in higher education. This article reports on a study that explored students’ understandings of plagiarism in relation to institutional plagiarism discourses at a New Zealand university. The qualitative study involved interviews with 21 undergraduate students, and analysis of University plagiarism policy documents. The University policy documents revealed moral and regulatory discourses. In the interviews, students predominantly drew on ethico-legal discourses, which reflected the discourses in the policy documents. However, the students also drew on (un)fairness discourses, confusion discourses, and, to a lesser extent, learning discourses. Notably, learning discourses were absent in the University policy. Our findings revealed tensions between the ways plagiarism was framed in institutional policy documents, and students’ understandings of plagiarism and academic writing. We suggest that, in order to support students’ acquisition of academic writing skills, plagiarism should be framed in relation to ‘learning to write’, rather than as a moral issue.

Keywords

Plagiarism Discourse Policy Higher education Cheating Academic writing Academic literacies 

References

  1. Adam, L. (2016). Student perspectives on plagiarism. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_67-1.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashworth, P., Freewood, M., & Macdonald, R. (2003). The student lifeworld and the meanings of plagiarism. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 34(2), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blum, S. (2009). My word! Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., McGowan, U., East, J., et al. (2014). ‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1150–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, V., & Howell, M. (2001). The efficacy of policy statements on plagiarism: Do they change students’ views? Research in Higher Education, 42(1), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Dawson, M., & Overfield, H. (2006). Plagiarism: Do students know what it is? Bioscience Education, 8(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: A qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. East, J. (2010). Judging plagiarism: A problem of morality and convention. Higher Education, 59(1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2007). Plagiarism and second language writing in an electronic age. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. London: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Grigg, G. (2009). Judgments about plagiarism and plagiarising students in institutional definitions. In Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity, 28–30 September, University of Wollongong. http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/09-4apcei/4apcei-Grigg.pdf.
  16. Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students’ understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1202–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howard, R. M. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. New York: Abler Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  19. Howard, R. M. (2000). Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62(4), 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutchings, C. (2014). Referencing and identity, voice and agency: Adult learners’ transformations within literacy practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 312–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaposi, D., & Dell, P. (2012). Discourses of plagiarism: Moralist, proceduralist, developmental and inter-textual approaches. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(6), 813–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCabe, D., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students—Literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Power, L. G. (2009). University students’ perceptions of plagiarism. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Price, M. (2002). Beyond ‘gotcha!’: Situating plagiarism in policy and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 54(1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roig, M. (2001). Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Valentine, K. (2006). Plagiarism as literary practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. College Composition and Communication, 58(1), 89–109.Google Scholar
  29. Vardi, I. (2012). Developing students’ referencing skills: A matter of plagiarism, punishment and morality or of learning to write critically? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 921–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98–105.Google Scholar
  31. Wingate, U., Andon, N., & Cogo, A. (2011). Embedding academic writing instruction into subject teaching: A case study. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee Adam
    • 1
  • Vivienne Anderson
    • 2
  • Rachel Spronken-Smith
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of DentistryUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Higher Education Development CentreUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  3. 3.Graduate Research SchoolUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations