Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 23–37 | Cite as

Undergraduate orientations towards higher education in Germany and England: problematizing the notion of ‘student as customer’

  • Richard Budd
Article

Abstract

There is a great deal of discussion in the academic literature around how the current conditions in higher education frame students as customers. Observers are of the view that rankings and marketing, an increased focus on student satisfaction, and particularly tuition fees, encourage an instrumental, passive attitude towards a university education. Given the volume of attention directed towards this topic, it is perhaps surprising that there is relatively little scholarship that examines it empirically. Some who have addressed it presumed a customer/consumer orientation in students and have been somewhat—but not entirely successful—in generating evidence to confirm those assumptions. It appears that the expectations of this instrumental, passive orientation are being realised in part, but that this is also mediated by other dispositions. What could be considered to be missing from the analysis thus far is an exploration of how students make university-related decisions (not simply what choices are based on) and how they understand the respective roles of the student and university. This study begins to fill that gap, exploring the orientations towards university of undergraduates in Germany and England, two countries where the diffusion of market conditions in higher education policies has been somewhat contrasting. Distinctions between the German and English students did emerge, but these were less based on those countries’ unequal engagement with tuition fees and rankings and more to do with other aspects of their university cultures and the world beyond their degrees. This suggests that how people approach their time as students is more complex than some of the literature assumes. Furthermore, at the very least, any consideration of this topic must include an analysis of how students themselves understand and experience their higher education and broader social contexts.

Keywords

Student as customer Higher education Commodification Europe Instrumentalism Tuition fees Rankings 

References

  1. Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BIS. (2011). Higher education: Students at the heart of the system. London: Department for Business Innovation & Skills.Google Scholar
  3. Bloch, R. (2009). Flexible Studierende? Studienreform und studentische Praxis. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  4. Brennan, J., Osborne, M., & Shah, T. (2009). What is learned at university? The social and organisational mediation of university learning (The SOMUL project): Key Findings. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2011). The global auction: The broken promises of education, jobs, and incomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Budd, R. (2014). Students as neo-institutional actors: A comparative case study of how German and English undergraduates understand, experience and negotiate higher education. University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  7. Carey, P. (2013). Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: A case study of students’ experience of participation in curriculum design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(3), 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carnevale, A. P., Cheah, B., & Strohl, J. (2012). Hard times: College majors, unemployment and earnings. Not all college degrees are created equal. Washington: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  9. Chevalier, A., & Conlon, G. (2003). Does it pay to attend a prestigious university? London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Croom Helm Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Crawford, C., & Jin, W. (2014). Payback time? Student debt and loan repayments: What will the 2012 reforms mean for graduates? (IFS Report R93). London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, P., et al. (2013). Labour market motivation and undergraduates’ choice of degree subject. British Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 361–382.Google Scholar
  13. Delucchi, M., & Korgen, K. (2002). “We’re the customers-we pay the tuition”: Student consumerism among undergraduate sociology majors. Teaching Sociology, 30(1), 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delucchi, M., & Smith, W. L. (1997). A postmodern explanation of student consumerism in higher education. Teaching Sociology, 25(4), 322–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fairchild, E., et al. (2005). Getting our money’s worth: Consumerist attitudes among Indiana University Students (pp. 6–8). Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  16. Federkeil, G. (2008). Rankings and quality assurance in higher education. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2–3), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibbons, S., Neumayer, E., & Perkins, R. (2013). Student satisfaction, league tables and university applications. London: London School of Economics & Political Science.Google Scholar
  18. Hazelkorn, E. (2008). Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21, 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2015). University Choice: What do we know, what don’t we know and what do we still need to find out? International Journal of Educational Management, 29(3), 254–274.Google Scholar
  20. Hughey, A. W. (2000). Application of the Deming philosophy to higher education Application of the Deming philosophy to higher education. Industry and Higher Education, 14(1), 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jary, D., & Shah, T. (2009). SOMUL Working Paper 6, Centre for Higher Education Research and Information (SHERI). York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, R. N., & Deem, R. (2003). Talking of students: Tensions and contradictions for the manager-academic and the university in contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 46, 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kosmütsky, A. (2010). Von der organisierten Institution zur institutionalisierten Organisation? Eine Untersuchung der (Hochschul-) Leitbilder von Universitäten. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  24. Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World Society and organizational change (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Krücken, G., & Röbken, H. (2009). Neo-institutionalistische Hochschulforschung. In S. Koch & M. Schemann (Eds.), Neo-Institutionalismus in der Erziehungswissenschaft (pp. 326–346). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leuze, K. (2011). How structure signals status: Institutional stratification and the transition from higher education to work in Germany and Britain. Journal of Education and Work, 24(5), 449–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Love, K. (2008). Higher education, pedagogy and the “customerisation” of teaching and learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mann, S. G. (2010). Student perspectives on the idea of a University: A study of the student experience in higher education and on the purpose of the University in Contemporary UK Society. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  29. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). Elaborating the “New Institutionalism”. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 3–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and markets in higher education: A “glonacal” analysis. Policy Futures in Higher Education, 2(2), 175–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marginson, S. (2006). Investment in the self: The government of student financing in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 37–41.Google Scholar
  33. Mark, E. (2013). Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCowan, T. (2012). Is there a universal right to higher education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(2), 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, I. (2005). Empowering participants or corroding learning? Towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education. Journal of Educational Policy, 20(3), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Naidoo, R., Shankar, A., & Veer, E. (2011). The consumerist turn in higher education: Policy aspirations and outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(11–12), 1142–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. OECD. (2012). Education at a glance 2012: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Olsen, J. P. (2007). Understanding institutions and logics of appropriateness: Introductory essay. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  39. Pritchard, R. (2011). Neoliberal development in higher education: The United Kingdom and Germany. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  40. Ranson, S. (1993). Markets or democracy for education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 41(4), 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Readings, B. (1999). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Reay, D., David, M. E., & Ball, S. J. (2005). Degrees of choice. Class, race, gender and higher education. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  43. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartzman, R. (1995). Are students customers? The metaphoric mismatch between management and education. Education, 116, 423–432.Google Scholar
  45. Spiegel. (2014). Niedersachsen: Letztes Bundesland schafft Studiengebühren ab. Spiegel Online. http://www.spiegel.de/unispiegel/studium/niedersachsen-schafft-die-studiengebuehren-zum-wintersemester-ab-a-938280.html.
  46. Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teichler, U. (2008). The end of alternatives to universities or new opportunities? In J. S. Taylor, J. Brites Ferreira, M. de Lourdes Machado & R. Santiago (Eds.), Non-university higher education in Europe (pp. 1–13). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Tight, M. (2013). Students: Customers, clients or pawns? Higher Education Policy, 26, 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomlinson, M. (2008). “The degree is not enough”: Students’ perceptions of the role of higher education credentials for graduate work and employability. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walkerdine, V., & Bansel, P. (2010). Neoliberalism, work and subjectivity: Towards a more complex account. In M. Wetherell & C. T. Mohanty (Eds.), The Saga handbook of realities (pp. 492–507). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  51. White, N. R. (2007). “The customer is always right?”: Student discourse about higher education in Australia. Higher Education, 54, 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Williams, S. (2000). “Going with the flow”: A study of young people’s decisions regarding participation in higher education. Cardiff: Cardiff University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationLiverpool Hope UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations