Higher Education

, Volume 71, Issue 6, pp 819–833 | Cite as

Bringing together knowledge and capabilities: a case study of engineering graduates

Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Possible futures for Science and Engineering Education

Abstract

In contemporary times there is a renewed focus on the purposes of university education in science or engineering, especially in emerging economy contexts like South Africa where the massification of higher education is in its early stages. The contributions by Muller (High Educ 70(3):409–416, 2015) and Walker (High Educ 70(3):417–425,2015) both recognise the crucial importance of expanding epistemological access for students from disadvantaged backgrounds, but their visions offer different emphases on how to proceed. Muller (2015) argues for the centring of disciplinary knowledge, while for Walker (2015) it is the concerns of society that should be central. In this article we argue that both of these are partial answers. We draw on a longitudinal study with ten South African engineering graduates, who were interviewed both in their third year and then approximately a decade later. Our analysis shows how the engagement with disciplinary knowledge is at the heart of the shaping of ‘graduateness’. Thus we argue for a coming together of the two perspectives in this issue towards a nuanced perspective on graduateness that recognises the significance of disciplinary knowledge but that also holds a space for the development of student agency in higher education.

Keywords

Knowledge Agency Engineering education Curriculum Graduateness 

References

  1. Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boughey, C. (2007). Educational development in South Africa: From social reproduction to capitalist expansion? Higher Education Policy, 20, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buffler, A., Allie, S., & Lubben, F. (2001). The development of first year physics students’ ideas about measurement in terms of point and set paradigms. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1137–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Case, J. M. (2013). Researching student learning in higher education: A social realist approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Davidowitz, B., & Rollnick, M. (2011). What lies at the heart of good undergraduate teaching? A case study in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(3), 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A., & Preez, J. D. (2007). Long-term retention of basic mathematical knowledge and skills with engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 735–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grasso, D., & Burkins, M. D. (Eds.). (2009). Holistic engineering education: beyond technology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Kloot, B., Case, J. M., & Marshall, D. (2008). A critical review of the educational philosophies underpinning Science and Engineering foundation programmes. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(4), 799–816.Google Scholar
  9. Linder, C. J. (1993). A challenge to conceptual change. Science Education, 77(3), 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marshall, D., & Case, J. M. (2010). Rethinking ‘disadvantage’ in higher education: A paradigmatic case study using narrative analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 491–504.Google Scholar
  11. Muller, J. (2000). Reclaiming knowledge: Social theory, curriculum, and education policy. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  12. Muller, J. (2014). Every picture tells a story: Epistemological access and knowledge. Education as Change, 18(2), 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muller, J. (2015). The future of knowledge and skills in science and technology higher education. Higher Education, 70(3), 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Potgieter, M., Rogan, J. M., & Howie, S. (2005). Chemical concepts inventory of grade 12 learners and UP foundation year students. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 121–134.Google Scholar
  16. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Sullivan, W. M. (2004). Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. von Blottnitz, H., Case, J. M., & Fraser, D. M. (2015). Sustainable development at the core of undergraduate engineering curriculum reform: A new introductory course in chemical engineering. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 300–307.Google Scholar
  20. Walker, M. (2015). Imagining STEM higher education futures: Advancing human well-being. Higher Education, 70(3), 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2013). Professional education, capabilities and the public good: The role of universities in promoting human development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. White, R. T. (1988). Learning science. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Wieman, C. E. (2007). Why not try a scientific approach to science education? Change, 39(5), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  25. Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Young, M., & Muller, J. (2014). Knowledge, expertise and the professions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa
  3. 3.Centre for Research in Engineering EducationUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations