Higher Education

, Volume 71, Issue 5, pp 681–697 | Cite as

Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research

  • Angela Brew
  • David Boud
  • Sang Un Namgung
  • Lisa Lucas
  • Karin Crawford
Article

Abstract

This paper asks the question: do people with different levels of research productivity and identification as a researcher think of research differently? It discusses a study that differentiated levels of research productivity among English and Australian academics working in research-intensive environments in three broad discipline areas: science, engineering and technology; social science and humanities; and medicine and health sciences. The paper explores the different conceptions of research held by these academics in terms of their levels of research productivity, their levels of research training, whether they considered themselves an active researcher and a member of a research team, and their disciplinary differences.

Keywords

Researchers Views of research Research training 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Grateful thanks are due to Peter Petocz for providing helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. The survey design and its Australian implementation were funded by a grant from The University of Sydney.

References

  1. Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boud, D., & Lee, A. (Eds.). (2009). Changing practices in doctoral education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bowden, J., Green, P., Barnacle, P., Cherry, N., & Usher, R. (2005). Academics’ ways of understanding success in research activities. In J. A. Bowden & P. Green (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 128–144). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brew, A., & Boud, D. (2009). Understanding academics’ engagement with research. In A. Brew & L. Lucas (Eds.), Academic Research and Researchers (pp. 189–203). London: SRHE and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brew, A., & Lucas, L. (2009). Academic research and researchers. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw Hill, Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bryans, P., & Mavin, S. (2006). Visual images: A technique to surface conceptions of research and researchers. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 1(2), 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dever, M., & Morrison, Z. (2009). Women, research performance and work context. Tertiary Education and Management, 15(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edgar, F., & Geare, A. (2013). Factors influencing university research performance. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 774–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher, R. L. (2005). The research productivity of scientists: how gender, organisation culture and the problem choice process influence the productivity of scientists. Oxford, UK: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, M. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grapin, S. L., Kranzler, J. H., & Daley, M. L. (2013). Psychology in the schools: Scholarly productivity and impact of school psychology faculty in APA-accredited programs. Psychology in the Schools, 50(1), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasselgren, B., & Beach, D. (1997). Phenomenography: A “good for nothing brother” of phenomenology? Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2005). Supervisors’ conceptions of research: What are they? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, D., Wolf-Wendel, L., & Twombly, S. (2011). International faculty: Experiences of academic life and productivity in U.S. universities. Journal of Higher Education, 82(6), 720–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kyvik, S. (2013). The academic researcher role: Enhancing expectations and improved performance. Higher Education, 65, 525–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lucas, L. (2006). The research game in academic life. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press and the Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  21. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, J. H. F., Shanahan, M. P., & Laugksch, R. C. (2005). Students’ conceptions of research: I—a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Padilla-Gonzalez, L., Metcalfe, A. S., Galaz-Fontes, J. F., Fisher, D., & Snee, I. (2011). Gender gaps in North American research productivity: Examining faculty publication rates in Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(5), 649–668.Google Scholar
  24. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Middleton, H. (2008). University academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instructional Science, 36(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quimbo, M.-A. T., & Sulabo, E. C. (2014). Research productivity and its policy implications in higher education institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1955–1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Serenko, & Bontis, (2004). Meta-review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: Citation impact and research productivity rankings. Knowledge and Process Management, 11(3), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smeby, J. C., & Try, S. (2005). Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 891–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2014). Conceptions of research: The doctoral student experience in three domains. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vermunt, J. (2005). Conceptions of research and methodology learning: A commentary on the special issue. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., Van Driel, J. H., Van der Rijst, R. M., Verloop, N., & Visser, A. (2009). The relationship between academics’ conceptions of knowledge, research and teaching—a metaphor study. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(6), 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Brew
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Boud
    • 3
    • 4
    • 8
  • Sang Un Namgung
    • 5
  • Lisa Lucas
    • 6
  • Karin Crawford
    • 7
  1. 1.Learning and Teaching CentreMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.The University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital LearningDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Faculty of Arts and Social ScienceUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Institute of Jeonbuk Education PolicyChonjuSouth Korea
  6. 6.Graduate School of EducationThe University of BristolBristolUK
  7. 7.Educational Development and Enhancement UnitThe University of LincolnLincolnUK
  8. 8.Institute for Work-Based LearningMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations