Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 70, Issue 4, pp 711–723 | Cite as

Relationship between levels of problematic Internet usage and motivation to study in university students

  • Phil ReedEmail author
  • Emma Reay
Article

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between problematic levels of Internet use and motivation to study in a university sample. One hundred and sixty-two participants were recruited online and completed four questionnaires: Internet Addiction Test, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Emotional–Social Loneliness Scale, and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Participants’ scores were analysed to determine the presence of problematic levels of Internet use and any relationship between this factor and motivation to study. The results demonstrated that levels of problematic Internet use were negatively associated with several aspects of motivation to study (intrinsic goal orientation, control over learning, and learning self-efficacy). These relationships were over and above any impact that depression, anxiety, and social isolation had on motivation to study. The results suggest that increasing employment of digital learning technologies in higher education may be generating problems for some students, which may negatively impact their academic experience and outcomes in higher education.

Keywords

Motivation to study Internet addiction Depression Anxiety Social isolation 

References

  1. Andrews, B., & Wilding, J. M. (2004). The relation of depression and anxiety to life–stress and achievement in students. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boekaerts, M. (2001). Context sensitivity: Activated motivational beliefs, current concerns and emotional arousal. In S. Volet & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in learning context: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 17–31). Pergamon: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Bozoglan, B., Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2013). Loneliness, self-esteem, and life satisfaction as predictors of Internet addiction: A cross-sectional study among Turkish university students. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandtzæg, P. B., Heim, J., & Karahasanović, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 69(3), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, M. K., & Man Law, S. P. (2008). Factor structure for Young’s Internet Addiction Test: A confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2597–2619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, L. Y., Hsiao, B., Chern, C. C., & Chen, H. G. (2014). Affective mechanisms linking Internet use to learning performance in high school students: A moderated mediation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chinn, M. D., & Fairlie, R. W. (2006). The determinants of the global digital divide: A cross country analysis of computer and internet penetration. Oxford Economic Papers, 18, 153–167.Google Scholar
  8. Christakis, D. (2010). Internet addiction: A 21st century epidemic? BMC Medicine, 8, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford, J. R., Henry, J. D., Crombie, C., & Taylor, E. P. (2001). Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40(4), 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Jong Gierveld, J., & Kamphuis, F. H. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness-scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (1999). Manual of the Loneliness Scale 1999. Department of Social Research Methodology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (updated version 18.01. 02).Google Scholar
  12. Dong, G., DeVito, E. E., Du, X., & Cui, Z. (2012). Impaired inhibitory control in ‘internet addiction disorder’: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 203, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Du, Y. S., Jiang, W., & Vance, A. (2010). Longer term effect of randomized, controlled group cognitive behavioural therapy for Internet addiction in adolescent students in Shanghai. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fortson, B. L., Scotti, J. R., Chen, Y.-C., Malone, J., & Del Ben, K. S. (2007). Internet use, abuse, and dependence among students at a southeastern regional university. Journal of American College Health, 56, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galacz, A., & Smahel, D. (2007). Information society from a comparative perspective: Digital Divide and social effects of the Internet. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 1(1).Google Scholar
  16. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerritsen, L. (1997). Meten met twee maten: Het meten van eenzaamheid en relatieverbrekingen blj’jong-volwassenen. Amsterdam: Dissertatie Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
  18. Gomes, L., & Murphy, J. (2003). An exploratory study of marketing international education online. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(3), 116–125.Google Scholar
  19. Griffiths, M. (2000). Internet addiction-time to be taken seriously? Addiction Research & Theory, 8, 413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gundogar, A., Bakim, B., Ozer, O. A., & Karamustafalioglu, O. (2012). P-32—The association between internet addiction, depression and ADHD among high school students. European Psychiatry, 27, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haines, M. E., Norris, M. P., & Kashy, D. A. (1996). The effects of depressed mood on academic performance in college students. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 519–526.Google Scholar
  22. Hardie, E., & Tee, M.-Y. (2007). Excessive internet use: The role of personality, loneliness and social support networks in internet addiction. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 5, 34–47.Google Scholar
  23. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4).Google Scholar
  24. Hazelhurst, S., Johnson, Y., & Sanders, I. (2011). An empirical analysis of the relationship between web usage and academic performance in undergraduate students. arXiv preprint arXiv:1110.6267.Google Scholar
  25. Howell, D. C. (1998). Statistical methods for psychologists (4th ed.). London: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  26. Johansson, A., & Götestam, K. G. (2004). Internet addiction: Characteristics of a questionnaire and prevalence in Norwegian youth (12–18 years). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, S. (2008). Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. Darby: DIANE.Google Scholar
  28. Juriševič, M., Glažar, S. A., Pučko, C. R., & Devetak, I. (2008). Intrinsic motivation of pre service primary school teachers for learning chemistry in relation to their academic achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Justice, E. M., & Dornan, T. M. (2001). Metacognitive differences between traditional-age and nontraditional-age college students. Adult Education Quarterly, 51(3), 236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahari, L. (2013). The effects of Cell phone use on the study habits of University of Zimbabwe First Year Faculty of Arts students. International Journal of Education and Research, 10, 1–12.Google Scholar
  31. Kandell, J. J. (1998). Internet addiction on campus: The vulnerability of college students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(1), 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim, C., & Pekrun, R. (2014). Emotions and motivation in learning and performance. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 65–75). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Konig-Zahn, C., Furer, J. W., & Tax, B. (1994). Het meten van de gezondheidstoestand (21, Lichamelijke gezondheid, sociale gezondheid: Beschrijving en evaluatie van vragenlijsten. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  34. Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., & Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e69841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kubey, R. W., Lavin, M. J., & Barrows, J. R. (2001). Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 366–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). Impact of Internet literacy, Internet addiction symptoms, and Internet activities on academic performance. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin, S. C., Tsai, K. W., Chen, M. W., & Koo, M. (2013). Association between fatigue and Internet addiction in female hospital nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 374–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84(4), 1475–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peterson, C., & Barrett, L. C. (1987). Explanatory style and academic performance among university freshman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Washington: Office of Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar
  44. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational psychology review, 16(4), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.Google Scholar
  46. Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Student’s motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149–184). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale.Google Scholar
  47. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). AnnArbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
  48. Romano, M., Osborne, L. A., Truzoli, R., & Reed, P. (2013). Differential psychological impact of internet exposure on internet addicts. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e55162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sahin, C. (2011). An analysis of Internet addiction levels of individuals according to various variables. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 60–66.Google Scholar
  50. Schiefele, U., & Rheinberg, F. (1997). Motivation and knowledge acquisition: Searching for mediating processes. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 251–301). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  51. Scott, P. (2000). Globalisation and higher education: Challenges for the 21st century. Journal of Studies in International Education, 4(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shields, N., & Kane, J. (2011). Social and psychological correlates of Internet use among college students. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 5(1).Google Scholar
  53. Snaith, R. P., & Zigmond, A. S. (1994). HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Windsor: NFER Nelson.Google Scholar
  54. Villella, C., et al. (2010). Behavioural addictions in adolescents and young adults: Results from a prevalence study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weigel, V. B. (2002). Deep learning for a digital age: Technology’s untapped potential to enrich higher education. Jossey-Bass, 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741.Google Scholar
  56. Weinstein, A., & Lejoyeux, M. (2010). Internet addiction or excessive internet use. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation.Google Scholar
  58. Widyanto, L., & McMurran, M. (2004). The psychometric properties of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams, M. (2011). Internet access—Households and individuals, 2011. London: HMO, Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
  60. Young, K. (1998). Caught in the Net. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySwansea UniversitySwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations