Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Engaging business in curriculum design and delivery: a higher education institution perspective


University-business cooperation has risen to one of the top priorities for many higher education institutions, with its importance mirroring attention from scholars and policy makers worldwide. Despite prolific research in this area, however, few have investigated curriculum-related university-business cooperation or its facilitators. Hence, this study investigates five mechanisms as drivers of business engagement in the design and delivery of the curriculum and the alignment of the curriculum with business needs. Results of a European-wide survey of higher education institution managers show the positive impact of senior management engagement, alumni networks and external communication of university-business cooperation, particularly on business engagement in curriculum design and the curriculum meeting industry needs. The higher education institution’s dedication of resources emerged as irrelevant in this context. The conceptual model is validated across higher education institutions with different levels of curriculum-related cooperation with business and across three countries, leading to implications for management and future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1


  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C., & Di Costa, F. (2011). University-industry research collaboration: A model to assess university capability. Higher Education, 62(2), 163–181.

  2. Asderaki, F. (2009). The impact of the Bologna Process on the development of the Greek quality assurance system. Quality in Higher Education, 15(2), 105–122.

  3. Auburn, T. (2007). Identity and placement learning: Student accounts of the transition back to university following a placement year. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 117–133.

  4. Baaken, T. (2007). Science Marketing—ein innovativer Ansatz zur Weiterentwicklung des Technologietransfers und zur erfolgreichen Drittmitteleinwerbung. In TTN Technologie Transfer Netzwerk Hessen (Ed.), Zukunftsszenarien des Wissens- und Technologietransfers zwischen Hochschulen und Wirtschaft (pp. 60–74). Bonn: Lemmens.

  5. Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university-industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272–285.

  6. Barnett, M. (2002). University-industry relationships in dentistry: past, present, future. Journal of Dental Education, 66(10), 1163–1168.

  7. Barney, J. B., & Wright, P. M. (1997). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. CAHRS working paper no. 97-09. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp/150.

  8. Benneworth, P. (2001). Academic entrepreneurship and long-term business relationships: Understanding “commercialization” activities. Enterprise Innovation Management Studies, 2(3), 225–237.

  9. Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59(5), 567–588.

  10. Bercovitz, J., & Feldmann, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188.

  11. Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university–industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3), 229–247.

  12. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2013). Academic Faculty in University Research Centers: Neither capitalism’s slaves nor teaching fugitives. Higher Education, 84(1), 88–120.

  13. Caniëls, M., & van den Bosch, H. (2011). The role of Higher Education Institutions in building regional innovation systems. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 271–286.

  14. Carayol, N. (2003). Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: Reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy, 32(6), 887–908.

  15. Chatterton, P., & Goddard, J. (2000). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 475–496.

  16. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

  17. Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2007). Intensification of university-industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54(1), 61–84.

  18. D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.

  19. Davey, T., Baaken, T., Galán-Muros, V., & Meerman, A. (2011). Study on the cooperation between Higher Education Institutions and Public and Private Organisations in Europe. European Commission, DG Education and Culture, Brussels, Belgium. ISBN 978-92-79-23167-4.

  20. David, P. A., & Metcalfe, S. (2007). Universities and Public Research Organisations in the ERA Fulfilling universities’ critical societal roles in the advancement of knowledge and the support of sustained innovation-driven economic growth in Europe. Prepared for the 8th June 2007 Brussels Meeting of the EC (DG-Research) Expert Group on “Knowledge and Growth”.

  21. Dew, N., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2007). Innovations, stakeholders and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 267.

  22. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. London: Sage.

  23. Drucker, J., & Goldstein, H. (2007). Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: A review of current approaches. International Regional Science Review, 30(1), 20–46.

  24. Dutrénit, G., De Fuentes, C., & Torres, A. (2010). Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 513–526.

  25. ECA [European Consortium for Accreditation]. (2014). Higher education system. Available online for Germany. http://ecahe.eu/w/index.php/Higher_education_system_in_Germany, for Spain http://ecahe.eu/w/index.php/Higher_education_system_in_Spain and for Poland http://ecahe.eu/w/index.php/Higher_education_system_in_Poland. Accessed Sept 29, 2014.

  26. Echeverri, P., & Skalen, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.

  27. Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(2), 18–29.

  28. European Commission. (2003). European Union-supported educational research. http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/report_education_03_en.pdf. Accessed Nov 25, 2013.

  29. European Commission. (2009).Metrics for knowledge transfer from public research organisations in EuropeExpert group report. Report from the European Commission’s Expert Group on Knowledge Transfer Metrics. ISBN 978-92-79-12009-1.

  30. Eurostat. (2012). Key data on Education in Europe 2012. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/978-92-9201-242-7/EN/978-92-9201-242-7-EN.PDF. Accessed Sept 29, 2014.

  31. Eurostat. (2013). New Cronos 2013. Mimas, University of Manchester. http://www.esds.ac.uk/international/doipages/eurostat.asp. Accessed 25 Nov, 2013.

  32. Eurostat. (2014). Eurostat databases. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database. Accessed Sept 29, 2014.

  33. Farrow, H., & Yuang, Y. C. (2011). Building stronger ties with alumni through Facebook to increase volunteerism and charitable giving. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(3), 445–464.

  34. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung—BMBF). (2014). Higher Education. http://www.bmbf.de/en/655.php. Accessed Sept 30, 2014.

  35. Feller, I. (2005). A historical perspective on government–university partnerships to enhance entrepreneurship and economic development. In S. Shane (Ed.), Economic development through entrepreneurship: Government, university and business linkages (pp. 6–28). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  36. Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113–1127.

  37. Forsyth, H., Laxton, R., Moran, C., van der Werf, J., Banks, R., & Taylor, R. (2009). Postgraduate coursework in Australia: Issues emerging from university and industry collaboration. Higher Education, 57(5), 641–655.

  38. Frasquet, M., Calderón, H., & Cervera, A. (2011). University–industry collaboration from a relationship marketing perspective: An empirical analysis in a Spanish university. Higher Education, 64(1), 85–98.

  39. Gallo, M. L. (2013). Higher education over a lifespan: A gown to grave assessment of a lifelong relationship between universities and their graduates. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1150–1161.

  40. German Centre for Research and Innovation (Deutsches Wissenschafts- und Innovationhaus). (2012). Keeping Manufacturing Competitive: Industry-University Collaboration in Germany and the U.S. http://www.germaninnovation.org/news-and-events/past-events/past-event?id=58e8ef0a-4f1d-e211-9fb3-000c29e5517f. Accessed Aug 25, 2013.

  41. Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4, 73–110.

  42. Gillis, M., & McNally, M. (2010). The influence of industry on dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 74(10), 1095–1105.

  43. Ginzburg, S., & Houli, E. (2013). Collaboration between the Academic World and Industry. Tefen Tribune, Winter Issue, 19–22.

  44. Goddard, J., & Chatterton, P. (1999). Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: harnessing the potential of universities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17(6), 685–699.

  45. Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R. (2011). Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4), 191–205.

  46. Gray, D. (2000). Cooperative research: Government-sponsored industry–university cooperative research: An analysis of cooperative research centre evaluation approaches. Research Evaluation, 8, 57–67.

  47. Gronroos, C. (2012). Conceptualising value co-creation: A journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(13/14), 1520–1534.

  48. Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.

  49. Gunasekara, C. (2006). The generative and developmental roles of universities in regional innovation systems. Science and Public Policy, 33(2), 137–151.

  50. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

  51. Healy, A., Perkmann, M., Goddard, J., & Kempton, L. (2014). Measuring the impact of universitybusiness cooperation. Catalogue No. NC-02-14-1337-EN-N. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  52. Hedvall, M. (2011). University-industry collaboration & degree mobility, EDAMBA &Hanken School of Economics. www.eua.be/Libraries/Doc-Careers/Prof_Maj-Britt_Hedvall_Doc-Careers__050411.sflb.ashx. Accessed Aug 25, 2013.

  53. Helmstädter, H. (2007). Diskussion mit den einleitenden Statements. In Meffert, H., Backhaus, K., Becker, J. (Eds.), HochschulmarketingHerausforderung und Erfolgsfaktoren im Wettbewerb, Dokumentationspapier No. 197 (pp. 60–67). Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Marketing und Unternehmensführung e. V., Leipzig.

  54. Ilyas, M. (2004). Best practices in industry–university collaboration. Government, industry and university relationships and collaboration. Published in the proceedings for the Second LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI’2004), Paper no. 037.

  55. Janger, J., Strauss, A., & Campbell, D. (2013). Academic careers: A cross-country perspective. WWWforEurope Working Paper no 37, August 2013.

  56. Kitawaga, F., & Lightowler, C. (2013). Knowledge exchange: A comparison of policies, strategies, and funding incentives in English and Scottish higher education. Research Evaluation, 22(1), 1–14.

  57. Kleinaltenkamp, M., Brodie, R. J., Frow, P., Hughes, T., Peters, L. D., & Woratschek, H. (2012). Resource integration. Marketing Theory, 12(2), 201–205.

  58. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

  59. Knouse, S., Tanner, J., & Harris, E. (1999). The relation of college internships, college performance, and subsequent job opportunity. Journal of Employment Counselling, 36(1), 35–43.

  60. Kock, N., Auspitz, C., & King, B. (2000). Using the web to enable industry–university collaboration: An action research study of a course partnership. Informing Science Special Series on Organizational Learning, 3(3), 157–166.

  61. Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the private interest: Has the lure of profits corrupted the virtue of biomedical research?. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

  62. Lamichhane, S., & Nath Sharma, T. (2010). University–industry relations: A thrust for transformation of knowledge and economic acceleration. Journal of Education and Research, 2, 59–66.

  63. Lee, Y. (2000). The sustainability of university–industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111–133.

  64. Lee, K. (2011). From interpersonal networks to inter-organizational alliances for university–industry collaborations in Japan: The case of the Tokyo Institute of Technology. R&D Management, 41(2), 190–201.

  65. Lewis, J. M., Ross, S., & Holden, T. (2012). The how and why of academic collaboration: Disciplinary differences and policy implications. Higher Education, 64, 693–708.

  66. Liefner, I., & Schiller, D. (2008). Academic capabilities in developing countries—A conceptual framework with empirical illustrations from Thailand. Research Policy, 37(2008), 276–293.

  67. Maggiora, E. (2008). La disciplina del commercio, 2nd edn. Integrataed Aggiornita, Enti Locali, new series. Cosa and Come Publishers.

  68. Mazzoleni, R. (2008). Catching up and academic institutions: A comparative study of past national experiences. The Journal of Development Studies, 44(5), 678–700.

  69. OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. (2013). Collaboration on innovation. In OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2013: Innovation for growth. OECD, Paris. doi:10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2013-20-en.

  70. Perkmann, M., Neely, A., & Walsh, K. (2011). How should firms evaluate success in university–industry alliances? A performance measurement system. R&D Management, 41(2), 202–216.

  71. Plewa, C. (2009). Exploring organizational culture difference in relationship dyads. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17(1), 46–57.

  72. Plewa, C., Korff, N., Baaken, T., & Macpherson, G. (2013). University–industry linkage evolution: An empirical investigation of relational success factors. R&D Management, 43(4), 365–380.

  73. Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285–301.

  74. Ramos-Vielba, I., & Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2012). Beneath the top of the iceberg: Exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages. Higher Education, 64(2), 237–265.

  75. Razvan, Z., & Dainora, G. (2009). Challenges and opportunities faced by entrepreneurial university. Some lessons from Romania and Lithuania. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 18(4), 874–876.

  76. Reynold, P., Bygrave, W., Autio, E., Cox, L., & Hay, M. (2002). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2002, Executive Report. Babson College, London Business School, Ewing Marion Kauffmann Foundation.

  77. Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions. Research Policy, 31, 1163–1180.

  78. Schiller, D., & Brimble, P. (2009). Capacity building for university–industry linkages in developing countries—The case of the Thai Higher Education Development Project. Science Technology Society, 14(1), 59–92.

  79. Serbanica, C. (2011). Knowledge circulation between universities, public research organizations and business in the EU 27. Drivers, barriers, actions to put forward. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 43–54.

  80. Shahabudin, S. (2006). University–industry collaboration in curriculum development. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. http://eprints.ukm.my/53/1/Session1-1-Prof.Shahabudin.pdf. Accessed Aug 25, 2013.

  81. Sharabati-Shahi, M. H. N., & Thiruchelvam, K. (2013). The role of diaspora in university–industry relationships in globalised knowledge economy: The case of Palestine. Higher Education, 65(5), 613–629.

  82. Siegel, D. J. (2007). Building a pipeline for diversity through intersectoral collaboration. Higher Education, 55(5), 519–535.

  83. Siegel, D. J., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 21(1–2), 115–142.

  84. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  85. Ssebuwufu, J., Ludwick, T., & Béland, M. (2012). Strengthening university–industry linkages in Africa—A study on institutional capacities and gaps. Canada: Canadian International Development Agency Publication.

  86. Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1992). Striking the mother lode in science: The importance of age, place, and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  87. Storm, A. (2008). Gemeinsam für mehr Autonomie und Wettbewerb an den Hochschulen: Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft und Politik im Dialog. In Siebenhaar, K. (ed.), Unternehmen UniversitätWissenschaft und Wirtschaft im Dialog (pp. 13–26). Wiesbaden.

  88. Strunz, K., Yokoyama, A., &Palma Behnke, R. (2003). Collaboration is key internationally. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, July/August 2003, 1540-7977/03.

  89. Tresserras, J., MacGregor, S., & Espinach X. (2005). SME collaboration as a driver of design research and education development. In Engineering and product design education conference (pp. 15–16). Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.

  90. Tucker, R. (2002). Driving growth through innovation—How leading firms are transforming their futures. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. ISBN 1-57675-187-2.

  91. van der Sijde, P. (2012). Profiting from knowledge circulation: The gains from university–industry interaction. Industry and Higher Education, 26(1), 15–19.

  92. Vargo, S. L. (2009). Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: A service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 373–379.

  93. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

  94. Wilson, T. (2012). A review of business-university collaboration. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32383/12-610-wilson-review-business-university-collaboration.pdf. Accessed Aug 25, 2013.

  95. Wood, M. (2011). A process model of academic entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 54(2), 153–161.

Download references


The authors gratefully acknowledge the very valuable feedback received from the editor and two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Correspondence to Carolin Plewa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plewa, C., Galán-Muros, V. & Davey, T. Engaging business in curriculum design and delivery: a higher education institution perspective. High Educ 70, 35–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9822-1

Download citation


  • University-business cooperation
  • Curriculum development
  • Curriculum design
  • Instruments
  • Europe