Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 69, Issue 6, pp 977–990 | Cite as

The relationship between spirituality and quality of life among university students: An autoregressive cross-lagged panel analysis

  • Wilfred W. F. Lau
  • C. Harry Hui
  • Jasmine Lam
  • Esther Y. Y. Lau
  • Shu-Fai Cheung
Article

Abstract

University represents a critical transition from secondary school. University students are exposed to many new opportunities and intellectual stimulations, and some may find university life stressful and demanding. The quality of life (QoL) of university students is thus an important topic for researchers and educators alike. Furthermore, many universities are now paying attention to the spirituality of students, besides emphasizing their cognitive and psychosocial development. Using a sample of 1,160 Chinese university students mainly recruited from Hong Kong, this autoregressive cross-lagged panel study investigated a causal model of spirituality and QoL over a 3-year period. The study also tested the causal model for factorial invariance (configural, measurement, and structural invariance) across gender, religion, and time. Results indicated that spirituality was a causal predictor of QoL but not vice versa. There was some evidence to support factorial invariance of the model across gender, religion, and time. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Longitudinal study Causality Spirituality Quality of life University students 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Ralph L. Piedmont for his permission to translate and use the Spirituality Transcendence Scale. We are grateful for the contribution of Doris Ng in reviewing the many spirituality measures, identifying, and translating the STS, as well as in data collection. Doris Mok and Eddie Ng contributed to the planning at the initial stage of this project. Hollace Chait, Stephanie Lam, Tina Lau, and Victoria Leung assisted in the literature review. Sing-hang Cheung provided useful inputs during our research meetings. To all of them, we express our gratitude.

References

  1. Astin, A. W., Astin, H. S., & Lindholm, J. A. (2011). Cultivating the spirit: How college can enhance students’ inner lives. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Bland, H. W., Melton, B. F., Welle, P., & Bigham, L. (2012). Stress tolerance: New challenges for millennial college students. College Student Journal, 46(2), 362–375.Google Scholar
  3. Bowman, N., & Small, J. (2010). Do college students who identify with a privileged religion experience greater spiritual development? Exploring individual and institutional dynamics. Research in Higher Education, 51(7), 595–614. doi: 10.1007/s11162-010-9175-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandenberger, J. W., & Bowman, N. A. (2013). From faith to compassion? Reciprocal influences of spirituality, religious commitment, and prosocial development during college. In A. B. Rockenbach & M. J. Mayhew (Eds.), Spirituality in college students’ lives: Translating research into practice (pp. 121–137). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Castellanos, J., & Gloria, A. M. (2008). Rese un Ave Maria y encendi una velita: The use of spirituality and religion as a means of coping with educational experiences for Latina/o college students. In B. McNeill & J. Abreu (Eds.), Latina/o healing practices: Mestizo and indigenous perspectives (pp. 195–219). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Chenot, D., & Kim, H. (2013). Development among adolescents and young adults: Longitudinal linkages between spirituality, religion, and social justice. In A. B. Rockenbach & M. J. Mayhew (Eds.), Spirituality in college students’ lives: Translating research into practice (pp. 138–152). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciarrocchi, J. W., & Deneke, E. (2006). Hope, optimism, pessimism, and spirituality as predictors of subjective well-being controlling for personality. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 16, 160–183.Google Scholar
  9. Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121–149. doi: 10.1177/0748175610373459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dy-Liacco, G. S., Kennedy, M. C., Parker, D. J., & Piedmont, R. L. (2005). Spiritual transcendence as an unmediated causal predictor of psychological growth and worldview among Filipinos. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 16, 261–286.Google Scholar
  11. Edgerton, J. D., Roberts, L. W., & von Below, S. (2012). Education and quality of life. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 265–296). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finkel, S. E. (2004). Cross-Lagged. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 229–230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Hales, D. (2009). An invitation to health (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Leaming.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, P. C. (2005). Measurement in the psychology of religion and spirituality: Current status and evaluation. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 43–61). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., Berg, M., Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2012). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: A review of spirituality questionnaires. Journal of Religion and Health, 51(2), 336–354. doi: 10.1007/s10943-010-9376-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kapuscinski, A. N., & Masters, K. S. (2010). The current status of measures of spirituality: A critical review of scale development. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2(4), 191–205. doi: 10.1037/a0020498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kessler, R. C., & Greenberg, D. F. (1981). Linear panel analysis: Models of quantitative change. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Krägeloh, C., Henning, M., Hawken, S., Zhao, Y., Shepherd, D., & Billington, R. (2011). Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire for use with medical students. Education for Health, 24(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
  20. Lau, E. Y. Y., Cheung, S.-H., Lam, J., Hui, C. H., Cheung, S.-F., & Mok, D. S. Y. (2014). Purpose-driven life: Life goals as a predictor of quality of life and psychological health. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9552-1.
  21. Lau, W. W. F., Hui, C. H., Lam, J., Lau, E. Y. Y., Ng, D., & Cheung, S.-F. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the spiritual transcendence scale in a Chinese sample: Is there factorial invariance across gender, occupation, and religion? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  22. Lazar, A. (2009). The relation between a multidimensional measure of spirituality and measures of psychological functioning among secular Israeli Jews. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 41(2), 161–181.Google Scholar
  23. Leung, K. F., Tay, M., Cheng, S., & Lin, F. (1997). Hong Kong Chinese version World Health Organisation Quality of Life Measure—Abbreviated version. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Hospital Authority.Google Scholar
  24. Levin, J., Chatters, L. M., & Taylor, R. J. (2011). Theory in religion, aging and health. Journal of Religion and Health, 50(2), 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang, W. M., Chang, C. H., Yeh, Y. C., Shy, H. Y., Chen, H. W., & Lin, M. R. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF in community-dwelling older people in Taiwan using rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research, 18(5), 605–618. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9471-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Little, T. D., Card, N. A., Preacher, K. J., & McConnell, E. (2009). Modeling longitudinal data from research on adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 15–54). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–121.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, S. M., Chan, F., Ferrin, J. M., Lin, C.-P., & Chan, J. Y. C. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis of the World Helath Organiziation Quality of Life Questionnaire—Brief Version for individuals with spinal cord injury. Rehabitation Counseling Bulletin, 51, 221–228. doi: 10.1177/0034355208316806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miner, M., Dowson, M., & Devenish, S. (2012). Beyond well-being: Spirituality and human flourishing. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Murray-Swank, N. A., & Pargament, K. I. (2005). God, where are you? Evaluating a spiritually-integrated intervention for sexual abuse. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 8(3), 191–203. doi: 10.1080/13694670500138866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide. (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  32. Nelson, J. M. (2009). Introduction to psychology, religion, and spirituality. In J. M. Nelson (Ed.), psychology, religion, and spirituality (pp. 3–41). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2012). Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  34. Park, C. L. (2007). Religiousness/spirituality and health: A meaning systems perspective. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 319–328. doi: 10.1007/s10865-007-9111-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piedmont, R. L. (2004a). Assessment of spirituality and religious sentiments, technical manual. Baltimore, MD: Author.Google Scholar
  37. Piedmont, R. L. (2004b). Spiritual transcendence as a predictor of psychosocial outcome from an outpatient substance abuse program. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(3), 213–222. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.18.3.213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piedmont, R. L. (2007). Spirituality as a robust empirical predictor of psychosocial outcomes: A cross-cultural analysis. In R. J. Estes (Ed.), Advancing quality of life in a turbulent world (pp. 117–134). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Piedmont, R. L., Ciarrocchi, J. W., Dy-Liacco, G., & Williams, J. E. G. (2009). The empirical and conceptual value of the spiritual transcendence and religious involvement scales for personality research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(3), 162–179. doi: 10.1037/a0015883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piedmont, R. L., & Friedman, P. H. (2012). Spirituality, religiosity, and subjective quality of life. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 313–329). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piedmont, R. L., Kennedy, M. C., Sherman, M. F., Sherman, N. C., & Williams, J. E. G. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the assessment of spiritual and religious sentiments (ASPIRES) Scale: Short form. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 19, 163–181. doi: 10.1163/ej.9789004166462.i-299.55.Google Scholar
  42. Piedmont, R. L., & Leach, M. M. (2002). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Spiritual Transcendence Scale in India: Spirituality as a universal aspect of human experience. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(12), 1888–1901. doi: 10.1177/0002764202045012011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plewis, I. (1985). Analysing change: Measurement and explanation using longitudinal data. Chichester, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Robotham, D. (2008). Stress among higher education students: Towards a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(6), 735–746. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9137-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosmarin, D. H., Krumrei, E. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2010). Are gratitude and spirituality protective factors against psychopathology? International Journal of Existential Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  46. Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Stein, J. A., Jiraphongsa, C., Khumtong, S., Lee, S.-J., & Li, L. (2010). Benefits of famliy and social relationships for Thai parents living with HIV. Prevention Science, 11, 298–309. doi: 10.1007/s11121-009-0165-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sawatzky, R., Ratner, P. A., & Chiu, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between spirituality and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 72, 153–188. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-5577-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saxena, S., Carlson, D., Billington, R., & Orley, J. (2001). The WHO quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-Bref): The importance of its items for cross-cultural research. Quality of Life Research, 10(8), 711–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sirgy, M. J. (2012). The psychology of quality of life: Hedonic well-being, life satisfaction, and eudaimonia. Social Indicators Research Series: Volume 50. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Steffen, P. R., & Masters, K. S. (2005). Does compassion mediate the intrinsic religion-health relationship? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 30(3), 217–224. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3003_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tisdell, E. J. (2001). Spirituality in adult and higher education. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED459370).Google Scholar
  52. Trompenaars, F. J., Masthoff, E. D., Van Heck, G. L., Hodiamont, P. P., & De Vries, J. (2005). Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients. Quality of Life Research, 14(1), 151–160. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0787-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 139–158. doi: 10.1177/1094428102005002001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. WHOQOL-SRPB Group. (2006). A cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion, and personal beliefs as components of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, 62(6), 1486–1497. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang, K. C., Hui, C. H., Lam, J., Lau, E. Y. Y., Cheung, S.-F., & Mok, D. S. Y. (2014). Personal spiritual values and quality of life: Evidence from Chinese college students. Journal of Religion and Health, 53(4), 986–1002. doi: 10.1007/s10943-013-9686-1.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilfred W. F. Lau
    • 1
  • C. Harry Hui
    • 2
  • Jasmine Lam
    • 2
  • Esther Y. Y. Lau
    • 2
  • Shu-Fai Cheung
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyThe University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyThe University of MacauMacau SARChina

Personalised recommendations