Higher Education

, Volume 69, Issue 6, pp 963–976 | Cite as

Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes



This paper proposes a model of learning-oriented assessment to inform assessment theory and practice. The model focuses on three interrelated processes: the assessment tasks which students undertake; students’ development of self-evaluative capacities; and student engagement with feedback. These three strands are explored through the analysis of assessment practice in context. The research method involves in-depth classroom observations of five recipients of awards for teaching excellence across multiple disciplines; and semi-structured interviews with these teachers and a sample of their students. Findings highlight assessment tasks promoting thinking and practicing in the discipline; the use of critical reviews to develop student understandings of quality work; and ‘same day feedback’ to promote timely dialogues with students. The coherence of the model is discussed and some areas for further exploration are suggested.


Learning-oriented assessment Assessment task design Student self-evaluation Engagement with feedback 



This research is funded by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong: HKU 740812H.


  1. Anderson, C., & Hounsell, D. (2007). Knowledge practices: ‘Doing the subject’ in undergraduate courses. The Curriculum Journal, 18(4), 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Developing assessment for informing judgment. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 181–197). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual basis and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66.Google Scholar
  6. Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from award-winning teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibbs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 23–36). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hernandez, R. (2012). Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning? Higher Education, 64, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development. In M. Slowey & D. Watson (Eds.), Higher education and the lifecourse (pp. 67–78). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  12. James, D. (2014). Investigating the curriculum through assessment practice in higher education: The value of a ‘learning cultures’ approach. Higher Education, 67, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCune, V., & Hounsell, D. (2005). The development of students’ ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses. Higher Education, 49, 255–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Norton, L., Norton, B., & Shannon, L. (2013). Revitalising assessment design: What is holding new lecturers back? Higher Education, 66, 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Orr, S., & Bloxham, S. (2012). Making judgments about students making work: Lecturers’ assessment practices in art and design. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 12(2–3), 234–253.Google Scholar
  18. Prosser, M. (2013). The four-year degree in Hong Kong: An opportunity for quality enhancement. In R. Land & G. Gordon (Eds.), Enhancing quality in higher education (pp. 201–212). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Schrand, T., & Eliason, J. (2012). Feedback practices and signature pedagogies: What can liberal arts learn from the design critique? Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations