Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 67, Issue 5, pp 637–654 | Cite as

University access and after: explaining the social composition of degree programmes and the contrasting expectations of students

  • Helena Troiano
  • Marina Elias
Article

Abstract

University expansion in higher education has been hierarchically differentiated. There is some concentration of certain social profiles in some degrees of study, so social composition between degrees can vary considerably. This article describes in terms of social composition 10 degrees of four public universities in the metropolitan area of Barcelona. We analyse 857 questionnaires filled in by mid-career students. From the perspective of agent’s decision on the choice of studies, we explore what were the factors that made them choose a concrete degree. We examine several variables that can indicate whether their expectations have been met or not. The results show that the factors predicted by the theory by which working-class (WC) students choose degrees—instrumental motivations and conditions that minimize the risk—are often met. In this regard, the recent structural reform related with the implementation of the European Higher Education Area that removes short-cycles degrees (3 years) could lead to a problem of access for WC students.

Keywords

Higher education Access to university Working-class University differentiation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This piece of research is part of the “National Plan for scientific research, technological development and research” (CSO2008-02812) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, which is entitled “Students in front of new university reform’. The authors are part of the GRET, the Education and Employment Research Group at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. The written version of this article has been re-drafted and discussed with the rest of the GRET members taking part in this research: Lidia Daza, Albert Sanchez-Gelabert and Josep Maria Masjuan.

References

  1. Archer, L., Leathwood, C., & Hutchings, M. (2002). Higher Education: A risky business. In A. Hayton & A. Pacazuska (Eds.), Access, participation and higher education: Policy and practice (pp. 106–121). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  2. Ariño, A., & Llopis, R. (2011). ¿Universidad sin clases? Condiciones de vida de los estudiantes universitarios en España (Eurostudent IV). Madrid: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
  3. Becher, T. (2001). Tribus y territorios académicos. Madrid: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  4. Boliver, V. (2011). Expansion, differentiation, and the persistence of social class inequalities in British higher education. Higher Education, 61(3), 229–242.Google Scholar
  5. Boudon, R. (1983). La desigualdad de oportunidades. Barcelona: Laia.Google Scholar
  6. Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. (1997). Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan, J., Edmunds, R., Houston, M., Jary, D., Lebeau, Y., Osborne, M., et al. (2009). Improving what is learned at university: An exploration of the social and organisational diversity of university education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Crozier, G., Reay, D., Clayton, J., Colliander, L., & Grinstead, J. (2008). Different strokes for different folks: Diverse students in diverse institutions—Experiences of higher education. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eurostat. (2009). The Bologna process in higher education in Europe. Key indicators on the social dimension and mobility. http://www.eurostudent.eu/download_files/documents/KS-78-09-653-EN.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2012.
  10. Gambetta, D. (1996). Were they pushed or did they jump? Individual decision mechanisms in education. Colorado: West View Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goldthorpe, J. (1992). Revised class schema. London: Social and Community Planning Research.Google Scholar
  12. Hatcher, R. (1998). Class differentiation in education: Rational choices? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Iannelli, C., Gamoran, A., & Paterson, L. (2011). Scottish higher education, 1987–2001: Expansion through diversion. Oxford Review of Education, 37(6), 717–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kloosterman, J.G. (2010). Social background and children’s educational careers: The primary and secondary effects of social background over transitions and over time in the Netherlands. ICS dissertation series; vol 165. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.Google Scholar
  15. Langa Rosado, D. (2003). Los estudiantes y sus razones prácticas: Heterogeneidad de estrategias de estudiantes universitarios según clase social. Phd dissertation. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Departamento de Sociología I.Google Scholar
  16. Leathwood, C., & O’Connell, P. (2003). ‘It’s a struggle’: The construction of the ‘new student’ in higher education. Journal education policy, 18(6), 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Power, S., Edwards, T., Whitty, G., & Wigfall, V. (2003). Education and the middle-class. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Read, B., Archer, L., & Leathwood, C. (2003). Challenging cultures? Student conceptions of ‘belonging’ and ‘isolation’ at a post-1992 university. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reay, D., Ball, S. J., David, M., & Davies, J. (2001). Choices of degree or degrees of choice? Social class, race and the higher education choice process. Sociology, 35(4), 855–874.Google Scholar
  20. Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2009a). ‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working-class students in UK higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  21. Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2009b). ‘Strangers in paradise’? Working-class students in elite universities. Sociology, 43(6), 1103–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reimer, D., & Jacob, M. (2010). Differentiation in higher education and its consequences for social inequality: Introduction to a special issue. Higher Education, 61(3), 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reisel, L. (2011). Two paths to inequality in educational outcomes. Family background and educational selection in the United States and Norway. Sociology of Education, 84(4), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanchez-Gelabert, A., & Navarro, J. (2012). ¿Cómo valoran los estudios los graduados universitarios? La influencia de la ocupación en la valoración de la formación universitaria y su utilidad, presented at VI Conference Young People and Societies, 7–9th June 2012. Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  25. Shavit, Y., Arum, R., Gamoran, A., & Menahem, G. (Eds.). (2007). Stratification in higher education: A comparative study. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Siano-Kyrgiou, E., & Tsiplakides, I. (2011). Similar performance, but different choices: Social class and higher education choice in Greece. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sullivan, A. (2001). Students as rational decision-makers: The question of beliefs and desires. Working Paper, 2001–02. Oxford Sociology.Google Scholar
  28. Tieben, N., & Wolbers, M. H. J. (2012). Transitions to post-secondary and tertiary education in the Netherlands: A trend analysis of unconditional and conditional socio-economic background effects. Higher Education, 60(1), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Triventi, M. (2011). Stratification in higher education and its relationship with social inequality: A comparative study of 11 European countries. European Sociological Review, 20, 1–14.Google Scholar
  30. Troiano, H. (2005). Quand les valeurs et attentes concernant l’avenir professionnel varient avec les profils motivationnels: La projection professionnelle des étudiants universitaires. In Ch. Hadji, T. Bargel, & J. M. Masjuan (Eds.), Étudier dans une université qui change (pp. 219–247). Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
  31. Voigt, K. (2007). Individual choice and unequal participation in higher education. Theory and Research in Education, 5(1), 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament de sociologia (G6-170)Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB)Cerdanyola, BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Departament de Teoria sociològica (0.10)Universitat de Barcelona (UB)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations