Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 67, Issue 5, pp 511–531 | Cite as

To stay or not to stay: retention of Asian international faculty in STEM fields

  • Janet H. Lawrence
  • Sergio Celis
  • Hee Sun Kim
  • Sarah Ketchen Lipson
  • Ximeng Tong
Article

Abstract

The present study identifies characteristics of individuals and work settings that influence Asian international faculty members’ intentions to continue their employment in US research universities. Given the demand for researchers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields (STEM), the higher rate of turnover among untenured faculty, and the replacement costs associated with turnover in STEM, the sample is limited to assistant professors employed in these areas. Multinomial regression analyses are conducted to identify variables that “pull” and “push” uncertain faculty toward intentions stay and leave their current institutions. The results suggest that faculty who are more satisfied with time available for research and those who express stronger organizational commitment are more likely to say they will stay. Those dissatisfied with the fairness of work evaluations and believe tenure decisions are not merit-based, are more likely to say they will leave.

Keywords

International faculty Faculty retention STEM fields United States 

References

  1. Abelson, M. A. (1993). Turnover cultures. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 11, 339–376.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G. (2006). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. The NEA 2006 Almanac of Higher Education. Washington, DC: NEA, 27–36.Google Scholar
  3. Altbach, P., & Balan, J. (2007). World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ambrose, S., Huston, T., & Norman, M. (2005). A qualitative method for assessing faculty satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 803–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Austin, A., & Rice, E. (1998). Making tenure viable: Listening to early career faculty. The American Behavioral Scientist, 41(5), 736–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes, L., Agago, M., & Coombs, W. (1998). Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartell, M. (2003). Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework. Higher Education, 45(1), 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bluedorn, A. (1982). The theories of turnover: Causes, effects, and meaning. In S. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 75–128). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bronstein, P., & Farnsworth, L. (1998). Gender differences in faculty experiences of interpersonal climate and processes for advancement. Research in Higher Education, 39(5), 557–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cantwell, B. (2011). Transnational mobility and international academic employment: gatekeeping in an academic competition arena. Minerva, 49(4), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cao, C. (2008). China’s brain drain at the high end: why government policies have failed to attract first-rate academics to return. Asian Population Studies, 4(3), 331–345.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, A. (2007). Commitment before and after: An evaluation and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 17(3), 336–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education [COACHE]. (2008). COACHE highlights report 2008. Cambridge: MA.Google Scholar
  15. Corley, E. A., & Sabharwal, M. (2007). Foreign born academic scientists and engineers: Producing more and getting less than their US-born peers? Research in Higher Education, 48(8), 909–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Currivan, D. B. (1999). The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover. Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), 495–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dailey, R., & Kirk, D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover. Human Relations, 45(3), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daly, C., & Dee, J. (2006). Greener pastures: Faculty turnover intent in urban public universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 776–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehrenberg, R. G., Rizzo, M. R., & Jackson, G. H. (2003). Who bears the growing cost of science at universities? Cornell Higher Education Research Institute, Working Paper 35.Google Scholar
  20. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., & Schuster, J. H. (1998). The new academic generation: A profession in transformation. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Flowers, V. S., & Hughes, C. L. (1973). Why employees stay. Harvard Business Review, 4, 49–60.Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, R. (2006). Does globalization of the scientific/engineering workforce threaten US economic leadership? Innovation Policy and the Economy, 6(6), 123–157.Google Scholar
  24. Griffeth, R., & Hom, P. (1988). A comparison of different conceptualizations of perceived alternatives in turnover research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(2), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagedorn, L. S. (1996). Wage equity and female faculty job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction causal model. Research in Higher Education, 37, 569–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T., & Lee, T. (2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present and a venture into the future. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 231–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hom, P., & Griffeth, R. (1995). Employee turnover. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.Google Scholar
  28. House, R., Shapiro, H. J., & Wahba, M. (1974). Expectancy theory as a predictor of work behavior and attitude: A re-evaluation of empirical evidence. Decision Sciences, 5(3), 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, J. (2004). The story is not in the numbers: Academic socialization and diversifying the faculty. Feminist Formations, 16(1), 172–185.Google Scholar
  30. Jayakumar, U., Howard, T., Allen, W., & Han, J. (2009). Racial privilege in the professoriate: An exploration of campus climate, retention, and satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(5), 538–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, J.M. (2006). International mobility of doctoral recipients from US Universities. Presented at the Council of Graduate Schools Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  32. Johnsrud, L. K., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Faculty worklife: Establishing benchmarks across groups. The Journal of Higher Education, 39(5), 539–555.Google Scholar
  33. Johnsrud, L., & Rosser, V. (2002). Faculty members’ morale and their intention to leave: A multilevel explanation. Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaminski, D., & Geisler, C. (2012). Survival analysis of faculty retention in science and engineering by gender. Science, 335, 864–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim, S. (2010). From brain drain to brain competition: Changing opportunities and the career patterns of US-trained Korean academics. In American universities in a global market (pp. 335–369). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kim, D., Wolf-Wendel, L., & Twombly, S. (2011a). International faculty: Experiences of academic life and productivity in US universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(6), 720–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim, D., Wolf-Wendel, L., & Twombly, S. (2011b). Longitudinal study of foreign-born faculty mobility. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  38. Kim, D., Wolf-Wendel, L., & Twombly, S. (2011c). Similarities and differences in mobility for US and Non-US citizen faculty: Exploring the underlying motivations for why they leave. Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, Charlotte, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  39. Koslowsky, M., Kluger, A. N., & Yinon, Y. (1988). Predicting behavior: Combining intention with investment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kramer, M. (1974). Reality shock: Why nurses are leaving nursing. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.Google Scholar
  41. Lawrence, J., Celis, S., & Ott, M. (in press). Is the tenure process fair: What faculty think. The Journal of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  42. Lawrence, J., Ott, M., & Bell, A. (2012). Faculty organizational commitment and citizenship. Research in Higher Education, 53(3), 325–352.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, J. J., & Kim, D. (2010). Brain gain or brain circulation? US doctoral recipients returning to South Korea. Higher Education, 59(5), 627–643.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, T., & Mowday, R. (1987). Voluntarily leaving an organization: An empirical investigation of Steers and Mowday’s model of turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 721–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin, Z., & Gao, Y. (2010). A comparative study of refereed journal articles published by native and foreign-born faculty in the US US-China. Education Review, 7(8), 78–86.Google Scholar
  46. Lin, Z., Pearce, R., & Wang, W. (2009). Imported talents: demographic characteristics, achievement and job satisfaction of foreign born full time faculty in four-year American colleges. Higher Education, 57, 703–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  48. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2005). Regression models for categorical outcomes using stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lowell, B. L. (2001). Skilled temporary and permanent immigrants in the US. Population Research and Policy Review, 20, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mamiseishvilli, K., & Rosser, V. (2010). International and citizen faculty in the United States: An examination of their productivity at research universities. Research in Higher Education, 51, 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mamiseishvilli, K. (2010). Foreign-born women faculty work roles and productivity at research universities in the United States. Higher Education, 60, 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Manger, T., & Eikeland, O. (1990). Factors predicting staff’s intentions to leave the university. Higher Education, 19(3), 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Manrique, C. G., & Manrique, G. G. (1999). The multicultural or immigrant faculty in American society. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  54. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. Martin, T. (1979). A contextual model of employee turnover intentions. Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Matier, M. W. (1990). Retaining faculty: A tale of two campuses. Research in Higher Education, 31, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, J. N. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mitchell, T. R. (1997). Matching motivational strategies with organizational contexts. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 57–94.Google Scholar
  60. Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes, consequences and control. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  61. Mowday, R. T., & Colwell, K. A. (2003). Employee reactions to unfair outcomes in the workplace: The contributions of Adams’ equity theory to understanding work motivation (pp. 65-82). In L. W. Porter, G. A. Bigley, & R. M. Steers (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (7th ed.). Irwin/McGraw-Hill: Burr Ridge, IL.Google Scholar
  62. Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  63. Mueller, C., & Price, J. (1990). Economic, psychological, and sociological determinants of voluntary turnover. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(3), 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. National Center for Education Statistics (2006, May). 2004 National study of postsecondary faculty (NSOPF:04) Retrieved July 17, 2011, from NCES website http://nces.ed.gov.
  65. National Science Foundation (December, 2010). Doctorate recipients from US Universities: 2009. Arlington, VA. NSF11-306. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf11306/theme1.cfm#2.
  66. Neumann, Y., & Finaly-Neumann, E. (1990). The reward-support framework and faculty commitment to their university. Research in Higher Education, 31(1), 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Norman, M., Ambrose, S., & Huston, T. (2006). Assessing and addressing faculty morale: Cultivating consciousness, empathy, and empowerment. The Review of Higher Education, 29(3), 347–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. O’Meara, K. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. The Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. O’Meara, K., & Campbell, C. (2011). Faculty sense of agency in decisions about work and family. The Review of Higher Education, 54(3), 447–476.Google Scholar
  70. Olsen, D. (1993). Work satisfaction and stress in the first and third year of academic appointment. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Olsen, D., & Near, J. P. (1994). Role conflict and faculty satisfaction. The Review of Higher Education, 17(2), 179–195.Google Scholar
  72. Olsen, D., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (1992). The pretenure years: A longitudinal perspective. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 50, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Open Doors (2008). Institute for International Education. Retrieved October10, 2012, from http://opendoors.iienetwork.org/.
  74. Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, D. (1992). Salary dispersion, location in the salary distribution, and turnover among college administrators. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Porter, L., & Lawler, E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  76. Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Price, J., & Mueller, C. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield: Pitman.Google Scholar
  78. Rice, E. R., & Austin, A. E. (1988). Faculty morale: What exemplary colleges do right. Change, 20(3), 51–58.Google Scholar
  79. Rosser, V. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rothblum, E. D. (1988). Leaving the ivory tower: Factors contributing to women’s voluntary resignation from academia. Frontiers, 10(2), 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ryan, J. F., Healy, R., & Sullivan, J. (2012). Oh, won’t you stay? Predictors of faculty intent to leave a public research university. Higher Education, 63, 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sana, M. (2010). Immigrants and natives in US science and engineering occupations, 1994–2006. Demography, 47(3), 801–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scholl, R. (1981). Differentiating organizational commitment from expectancy as a motivating force. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 589–599.Google Scholar
  85. Schuster, J., & Finkelstein, M. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Seifert, T., & Umbach, P. (2008). The effects of faculty demographic characteristics and disciplinary context on dimensions of job satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 49, 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shore, L. M., Newton, L. A., & Thornton, G. C. (1990). Job and organizational attitudes in relation to employee behavioral intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Skachkova, P. (2007). Academic careers of immigrant women professors in the US. Higher Education, 53, 697–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 31(5), 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Somers, M. J. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover, and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Song, H. (1997). From brain drain to reverse brain drain. Three decades of Korean experience. Science Technology and Society, 2(2), 317–345.Google Scholar
  92. Sorcinelli, M. D. (1992). New and junior faculty stress: Research and responses. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 50, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Steel, R., & Ovalle, N. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). Introduction to special topic forum: The future of work motivation theory. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379–387.Google Scholar
  95. Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1974). Motivation and work behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  96. Tett, R., & Meyer, J. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thomas, J. M., & Johnson, B. J. (2004). Perspectives of international faculty members: Their experiences and stories. Education and Society, 22(3), 47–64.Google Scholar
  98. Trevor, C. O. (2001). Interactions among actual ease-of-movement determinants and job satisfaction in the prediction of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Van De Bunt-Kokhus, S. (2000). Going places: Social and legal aspects of international faculty mobility. Higher Education in Europe, 25(1), 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  101. Webber, K. L. (2012). Research productivity of foreign- and US-born faculty: differences by time on task. Higher Education, 64, 709–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Weimer, W. (1985). Why do faculty members leave a university? Research in Higher Education, 23, 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wells, R., Seifert, T., Park, S., Reed, E., & Umbach, P. D. (2007). Job satisfaction of international faculty in US higher education. Journal of the Professoriate, 2(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
  104. Xu, Y. (2008). Faculty turnover: Discipline-specific attention is warranted. Research in Higher Education, 49(1), 40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Youn, T., & Price, T. (2009). Learning from the experience of others: The evolution of faculty tenure and promotion rules in comprehensive institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(2), 204–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. (2004). Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 139–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zweig, D. (2006). Competing for talent: China’s strategies to reverse the brain drain. International Labour Review, 145(1–2), 65–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet H. Lawrence
    • 1
  • Sergio Celis
    • 1
  • Hee Sun Kim
    • 1
  • Sarah Ketchen Lipson
    • 1
  • Ximeng Tong
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, School of EducationUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations