Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 66, Issue 6, pp 693–706 | Cite as

Unraveling the process and meaning of problem-based learning experiences

  • Satoru TakahashiEmail author
  • Eisuke Saito
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the process and meaning of problem-based learning (PBL) that students may experience. The Project Cycle Management method was taught and utilised as an instrument of PBL at a Japanese women’s college over a period of 5 years. The study closely examined what and how students learned in PBL from the perspectives of cognitive, social, and internal aspects. Despite the relative ignorance about the internal aspect of learners in previous research, the results of the study revealed that the internal aspect is inseparably linked with the other two aspects, and the three of them simultaneously undergo their own changes in the PBL process. That is, meaningful learning experiences seem to be no less importantly affected by the feelings or internal aspect of learners than by cognitive and social counterparts. Then, beyond knowledge building and skill acquirement, PBL may have contributed to broadening learners’ perspectives and promoting their personal development. In this regard, PBL can be defined anew, from an angle different from that of previous research, as learning that can generate rich and varied emotions in learners concurrently as they face problems, enable them to acquire subject matter knowledge and relational skills through dialogue, and eventually guide them to the threshold of personal transformation.

Keywords

Problem-based learning Project cycle management Internal aspect Dialogue Personal transformation 

References

  1. Åkerlind, G. S. (2003). Growing and developing as a university teacher: Variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akınoğlu, O., & Tandoğan, R. Ö. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 71–81.Google Scholar
  3. Annerstedt, C., Garza, D., Huang-DeVoss, C., Lindh, J., & Rydmark, M. (2010). Research-able through problem-based learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 107–127.Google Scholar
  4. Askell-Williams, H., Murray-Harvey, R., & Lawson, M. J. (2007). Teacher education students’ reflections on how problem-based learning has changed their mental models about teaching and learning. The Teacher Educator, 42(4), 237–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, T. (2010). The problem-based learning process as finding and being in flow. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Berkel, H. J. M. V., & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning. Higher Education, 40(2), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birch, W. (1986). Towards a model for problem-based learning. Studies in Higher Education, 11(1), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Heineman.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Academic Medicine, 75(3), 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. De Simon, C. (2008). Problem-based learning: A framework for perspective teachers’ pedagogical problem solving. Teacher Development, 12(3), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fenwick, T. J. (2002). Problem-based learning, group process and the mid-career professional: Implications for graduate education. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development (FASID). (1993). Project Cycle Management (PCM): Management tool for development assistance. Tokyo: FASID.Google Scholar
  17. Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development (FASID). (2008). Project Cycle Management (PCM): Management tool for development assistance (7th ed.). Tokyo: FASID.Google Scholar
  18. Harland, T. (2002). Zoology students’ experiences of collaborative enquiry in problem-based learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harland, T. (2003). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and problem-based learning: Linking a theoretical concept with practice through action research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hitchcock, M. A., & Mylona, Z. E. (2000). Teaching faculty to conduct problem-based learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 12(1), 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 21–39.Google Scholar
  22. Hmelo-Siver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horii, H. (2004). Mondai kaiketsu notameno shakai gijutsu [Social technology for problem-solving]. Tokyo: Chuokoronsha.Google Scholar
  24. Hussain, R. M. R., Mamat, W. H. W., Salleh, N., Saat, R. M., & Harland, T. (2007). Problem-based learning in Asian universities. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 761–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ikeda, D., & Unger, F. (2005). Dialogue: The humanist principle—compassion and tolerance (1). The Journal of Oriental Studies, 15, 3–41.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kato, F. (2005). Facilitation in communication: Toward a study of an educational gaming simulation. In Gaming, simulation, and society: Research scope and perspective. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Kaufman, D. M., & Mann, K. V. (2001). Don’t want to be a groupie. In Problem-based learning. In P. Schwartz, S. Mennin, & G. Webb (Eds.), Curriculum Journal (pp. 142–148). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Keville, S., Nel, P. W., Uprichard, S., McCarney, R., Jeffrey, S., Ford, D., et al. (2009). Reaching the journey’s end: Reflections on the final phase of a problem-based learning group. Reflective Practice, 10(5), 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kino, S. (2009). Classes engaging both teacher and students: Toward conversion of the educational paradigm of the large-scale lecture class. Kyoto University Researches in Higher Education, 15, 1–13.Google Scholar
  31. Koh, G. C., Khoo, H. E., Wong, M. L., & Koh, D. (2008). The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: A systematic review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 178(1), 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar, M., & Natarajan, U. (2007). A problem-based learning model: Showcasing an educational paradigm shift. Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lovie-Kitchin, J. (2001). Reflecting on assessment. In P. Schwartz, S. Mennin, & G. Webb (Eds.), Problem based learning—Case studies, experience and practice (pp. 149–155). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  34. Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Massa, N. M. (2008). Problem-based learning (PBL): A real-world antidote to the standards and testing regime. The New England Journal of Higher Education, 22, 19–20.Google Scholar
  36. Matsushita, K. (2002). Research on teaching at university in an era of student consumerism in Japan: An analysis of learning activity. Kyoto University Researches in Higher Education, 8, 19–38.Google Scholar
  37. Maxwell, N. L., Mergendoller, J. R., & Bellisimo, Y. (2004). Developing a problem-based learning simulation: An economics unit on trade. Simulation & Gaming, 35(4), 488–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moust, J. H. C., Berkel, H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem-based learning at Maastricht University. Higher Education, 50(4), 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nel, P. W., Keville, S., Ford, D., McCarney, R., Jeffrey, S., Adams, S., et al. (2008). Close encounters of the uncertain kind: Reflections on doing problem-based learning (PBL) for the first time. Reflective Practice, 9(2), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Petranek, C. (1994). A maturation in experiential learning: Principles of simulation and gaming. Simulation & Gaming, 25(4), 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramsay, J., & Sorrell, E. (2007). Problem-based learning: An adult-education-oriented training approach for SH&E practitioners. Professional Safety, 52(9), 41–46.Google Scholar
  43. Reynolds, J. M., & Hancock, D. R. (2010). Problem-based learning in a higher education environmental biotechnology course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rhem, J. (1998). Problem-based learning: An introduction. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 8(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sato, M., & Sato, M. (2011). Chugakko ni okeru Taiwa to Kyodo [Dialogue and Collaboration in Junior High Schools]. Tokyo: Gyosei.Google Scholar
  46. Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  47. Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17(1), 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundations of problem-based learning: Some explanatory notes. Academic Medicine, 27(5), 422–432.Google Scholar
  49. Severiens, S. E., & Schmidt, H. G. (2009). Academic and social integration and study progress in problem based learning. Higher Education, 58(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stead, D. R. (2005). A review of the one-minute paper. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6(2), 118–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 44–58.Google Scholar
  52. Takahashi, S., & Saito, E. (2011). Changing pedagogical styles: A case study of the Trading Game in a Japanese university. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Takeda, M., & Hayashi, T. (2006). A study on proposal type instructional model by using PCM for education. Yamaguchi University Bulletin of the Integrated Center for Educational Research and Training, 22, 1–16.Google Scholar
  54. Vardi, I., & Ciccarelli, M. (2008). Overcoming problems in problem-based learning: A trial of strategies in an undergraduate unit. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams, B. (2001). The theoretical links between problem-based learning and self-directed learning for continuing professional nursing education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 85–98.Google Scholar
  56. Yew, E. H. J., Chng, E., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Is problem-based learning cumulative? Advances in Health Science Education, 16(4), 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Japan International Cooperation AgencyTokyoJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations