Higher Education

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 79–93 | Cite as

A reinterpretation of institutional transformations in European higher education: strategising pluralistic organisations in multiplex environments

  • Nicoline Frølich
  • Jeroen Huisman
  • Stig Slipersæter
  • Bjørn Stensaker
  • Paulo Charles Pimentel Bótas
Article

Abstract

The paper draws on institutional theory with special attention to recent contributions that aim at developing its micro-foundations. We address the question of how individual higher education institutions deal with institutional pluralism. We develop an analytical framework inspired by institutional theory, the sensemaking perspective in organisation theory and strategy-as-practice to connect the macro-transformation processes of the organisational field and the micro-processes of organisational strategising.

Keywords

Strategy Institutional theory Micro–macro Diversity Sensemaking 

References

  1. Amaral, A., Jones, G. A., & Karseth, B. (Eds.). (2002). Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Amaral, A., Meek, L., & Larsen, I. M. (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution?. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of the disciplines (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bleiklie, I. (2007). Systemic integration and macro steering. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2007). Theoretical perspectives on university strategy. In A. Bonaccorsi & C. Daraio (Eds.), Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialisation and performance in Europe (pp. 3–30). Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Quality assessment and institutional change: Experiences from 14 countries. Higher Education, 40, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2004). Transparency and quality in higher education markets. In P. Teixeira, B. Jonbloed, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality? (pp. 61–85). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited. Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Eds.). (2006). Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Member’s responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 442–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frølich, N., & Stensaker, B. (2012). Strategy formulation in universities—An investigation of cultural practices. In B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa, & C. Sarrico (Eds.), Managing reform in higher educationChanging cultures and identities. Palgrave.Google Scholar
  17. George, P., Chattopadyay, E., Sitkin, S. B., & Barden, J. (2006). Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huisman, J. (Ed.). (2009). International perspectives on the governance of higher education. Alternative frameworks for coordination. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis group.Google Scholar
  20. Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jarzabkowski, P., & Wilson, D. C. (2002). Top teams and strategy in a UK university. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Labianca, G., Fairbank, J. F., Thomas, J. B., & Gioia, D. A. (2001). Emulation in academia: Balancing structure and identity. Organization Science, 12(3), 312–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (Eds.). (2009). Institutional work. Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Maassen, P., & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.). (2007). University dynamics and European integration. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1996). Institutional perspectives on political institutions. Governance, 9, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marginson, S., & Van der Wende, M. (2009). The new global landscape of nations and institutions. In OECD (Ed.), Higher education to 2030, volume 2: Globalisation (pp. 17–62). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L. C. J., & Huisman, J. (2000). Editorial: diversity, differentiation and the market. Higher Education Policy, 13(4), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L. C. J., Kivinen, O., & Rinne, R. (Eds.). (1996). The mockers and mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  31. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miettinen, R., Samra-Frederucks, D., & Yanow, D. (2009). Re-turn to practice: An introduction essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Mintzberg, H. (1987). The strategy concept I: Five P’s for strategy. In G. R. Carroll & D. Vogle (Eds.), Organizational approaches to strategy (pp. 7–19). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  35. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 145–179.Google Scholar
  36. Paradeise, C., Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Goastellec, G., Michelsen, S., Reale, E., et al. (2009a). Reform policies and change processes in Europe. In J. Huisman (Ed.), International perspectives on the governance of higher education. Alternative frameworks for coordination (pp. 88–106). London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis group.Google Scholar
  37. Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2009b). University governance: Western european comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Micro-foundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rossi, F. (2009). Universities’ access to research funds: Do institutional features and strategies matter? Tertiary Education and Management, 15(2), 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24(3), 196–227.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2006). Organizations and organizing. Rational, natural and open system perspectives. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.Google Scholar
  43. Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organisations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  45. Shattock, M. (2003). Managing successful universities. Maidenhead: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Simpson, B. (2009). Pragmatism, mead and the practice turn. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1329–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stensaker, B., Frølich, N., Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2008). Internationalisation of higher education—The gap between national policy-making and institutional needs. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tammi, T. (2009). The competitive funding of university research: The case of Finnish science universities. Higher Education, 57, 657–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Teichler, U. (2007). The changing patterns of the higher education systems in Europe and the future task of higher education research. In European Science Foundation (ESF) (Ed.), Higher education looking forward: Relations between higher education and society (pp. 79–103). Strasbourg: European Science Foundation(ESF).Google Scholar
  50. Teixeira, P., Jongbloed, B., Dill, D., & Amaral, A. (Eds.). (2004). Markets in higher education. Rhetoric or reality?. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  51. Wedlin, L. (2006). Ranking business schools: Forming fields, identities and boundaries in international management education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  52. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Westerheijden, D. F., Stensaker, B., & Rosa, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Quality assurance in higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicoline Frølich
    • 1
  • Jeroen Huisman
    • 2
  • Stig Slipersæter
    • 3
  • Bjørn Stensaker
    • 1
  • Paulo Charles Pimentel Bótas
    • 2
  1. 1.NIFU, Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and EducationOsloNorway
  2. 2.International Centre for Higher Education Management, School of ManagementUniversity of BathBathUK
  3. 3.The Research Council of NorwayOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations