Higher Education

, Volume 65, Issue 6, pp 761–780 | Cite as

Understanding sensemaking/sensegiving in transformational change processes from the bottom up

Article

Abstract

Government agencies, foundations, business and industry, and other important higher education stakeholders continue to invest in important and deep changes they think are necessary for the vitality and health of higher education particularly interdisciplinary teaching and research. But we know little about how transformational changes happen, particularly bottom up approaches required for altering the teaching/learning environment. This article reports on one of the few studies of transformational change describing case study research of 28 institutions attempting to fundamentally shift toward interdisciplinary work. The results identify the key role of sensemaking and sensegiving and build on earlier research showing how these processes change from mobilization to the implementation of change.

Keywords

Transformational change Interdisciplinarity Faculty change agents 

References

  1. Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2005). From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies, 26, 1573–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartunek, J., Krim, R., Necochea, R., & Humphries, M. (1999). Sensemaking, sensegiving and leadership in strategic organizational development. Advances in Qualitative Organizational Research, 2, 37–71 (New York: JAI Press).Google Scholar
  3. Coburn, C. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond the numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowan, R. (1993). Prescription for small college turn-around. Change, 25(1), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curry, B. (1992). Instituting enduring innovations: Achieving continuity and change in higher education. ASHE-ERIC reports, no. 7. Washington DC: George Washington University.Google Scholar
  6. Eckel, P., & Kezar, A. (2003a). Taking the reins: Institutional transformation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: ACE-ORYX Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eckel, P., & Kezar, A. (2003b). Key strategies for making new institutional sense. Higher Education Policy, 16(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gioia, D., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gioia, D., & Thomas, J. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academic: The dynamics of sensemaking and the influence. Organization Science, 5(3), 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gioia, D., & Thomas, J. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaiser, J., & Kaiser, P. (1994). Persuasive messages to support planned change. College and university, 69(2), 124–129.Google Scholar
  12. Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2002a). Examining the institutional transformation process: The importance of sensemaking, inter-related strategies and balance. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 295–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2002b). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 435–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kezar, A., & Lester, J. (2011). Enhancing campus capacity for leadership: An examination of grassroots leaders. Stanford, CA: Stanford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maitlis, S., & Lawrence, T. B. (2007). Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick 1988. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 551–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1413–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations