Community-university engagement: the Philippi CityLab in Cape Town and the challenge of collaboration across boundaries
- First Online:
- 883 Downloads
Debates about the role of the university in society have been going on for many decades. There have been several calls for a more “engaged” form of scholarship which applies itself consciously to the pursuit of applied knowledge which can contribute towards solving some of the most pressing societal challenges. Closer collaboration between universities and community groups has been identified as a central component of this form of scholarship. This paper interrogates the literature on the role of universities in society, with a specific focus on university-community partnerships, and discusses the experience of the Philippi CityLab in Cape Town, South Africa to shed some light on the complexities, challenges and rewards of university-community interactions. The case of the Philippi CityLab confirms many of the pre-requisites for “successful” collaboration between universities and communities as identified in the literature. The paper argues that the ideal of a more engaged scholarship is certainly worth pursuing and that there is no doubt that South African universities do have a role to play in terms of working with communities to find workable solutions to the myriad of development challenges which they face. However, the experience of the Philippi CityLab also shows that stakeholders should not be naïve about the time, effort and investment which these kinds of engagements require and the difficulty of establishing, maintaining and sustaining genuine, mutually beneficial university-community collaborations. Furthermore, a truly engaged scholarship requires a significant transformation of the institutional context within universities in order to not only facilitate and support, but also reward research which seek closer collaboration between universities and communities.
KeywordsCommunity-university collaboration Scholarship of engagement Boundary work New forms of scholarship Applied research
- Adlard, G. (2008). An Introduction to Philippi. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
- Anderson, V., et al. (2009). Philippi community profile—final report. South African Education and Environment Project (SAEP).Google Scholar
- Bender, G. (2008). Exploring conceptual models for community engagement at higher education institutions in South Africa. Perspectives in Education, 26(1), 81–95.Google Scholar
- Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the Professorate. New Jersey: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
- Checkoway, B (2000). Public service: our new mission. Academe Online.Google Scholar
- Creighton, S. J (2006). Community partner indicators of engagement: an action research study on campus-community partnership. Unpublished PhD thesis.Google Scholar
- Davies, C. A. (1999). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
- Erasmus, J., & Mans, G. (2005). Philippi transformation research project. The Unit for Religion and Development Research and Transformation Africa, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.Google Scholar
- Greenaway, L. (2010). Reflexivity: the researcher’s voice in qualitative research. http://www.evaluationservices.co.uk/43/Reflexivity-the-researcher039s-voice-qualitative-research.
- McMillan, J. (2009). Illuminating transaction spaces in higher education: service learning, boundary work and boundary workers. Paper presented at the Knowledge and Curriculum in Higher Education Symposium, 29–30 June 2009, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
- Pillow, W. S. (2003). Confessions, catharsis or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Qualitative studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.Google Scholar