Exploring emotion in the higher education workplace: capturing contrasting perspectives using Q methodology
- 735 Downloads
This article presents an original application of Q methodology in investigating the challenging arena of emotion in the Higher Education (HE) workplace. Q’s strength lies in capturing holistic, subjective accounts of complex and contested phenomena but is unusual in employing a statistical procedure within an interpretivist framework. Here Q is used to capture the emotional tone of the working lives of academic and support colleagues in one UK Higher Education Institution (HEI). Research design and data analysis were underpinned by the concept of appraisal, which has an established history in stress and emotion scholarship across a range of disciplines. Four distinct illustrative workplace accounts are presented and analysed in terms of their relevance for individual emotion and wellbeing. The utility of this application of Q methodology in surfacing and comparing differing experiences of university life is discussed and the implications for institutional research and practice are considered.
KeywordsWorkplace Emotion Health Wellbeing Q methodology Identity
- Basch, J., & Fisher, C. D. (1998) Affective events-emotion matrix: A classification of work events and associated emotions. Bond School of Business Discussion Papers, Paper 65. Available at http://epublications.bond.edu.au/discussion_papers/65. Accessed 7 June 2011.
- Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education/Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. R. (1997). The history and principles of Q methodology in psychology and the social sciences. Available at http://facstaff.uww.edu/cottlec/Qarchive/Bps.htm. Accessed 16 June 2011.
- Fineman, S. (2000b). Commodifying the emotionally intelligent. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (2nd ed., pp. 101–114). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Frijda, N. H. (1993). The place of appraisal in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 7(3/4), 357–387.Google Scholar
- Hartel, C. E., & Zerbe, W. J. (2000). Reconciling research findings. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. Hartel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory and practice (pp. 215–217). Westport, CA: Quorum.Google Scholar
- International Labour Organization. (2010). Emerging risks and new patterns of prevention in a changing world of work. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
- Layder, D. (2004). Emotion in social life: The lost heart of society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Smyth, J. (Ed.). (1995). Academic work: The changing labour process in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University.Google Scholar
- Stainton Rogers, R. (1995). Q Methodology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Re-thinking methods in psychology (pp. 178–207). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Stephenson, W. (1980). Consciring: A general theory for subjective communicability. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4 (pp. 7–36). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar