Higher Education

, Volume 64, Issue 6, pp 891–909 | Cite as

Exploring emotion in the higher education workplace: capturing contrasting perspectives using Q methodology

Article

Abstract

This article presents an original application of Q methodology in investigating the challenging arena of emotion in the Higher Education (HE) workplace. Q’s strength lies in capturing holistic, subjective accounts of complex and contested phenomena but is unusual in employing a statistical procedure within an interpretivist framework. Here Q is used to capture the emotional tone of the working lives of academic and support colleagues in one UK Higher Education Institution (HEI). Research design and data analysis were underpinned by the concept of appraisal, which has an established history in stress and emotion scholarship across a range of disciplines. Four distinct illustrative workplace accounts are presented and analysed in terms of their relevance for individual emotion and wellbeing. The utility of this application of Q methodology in surfacing and comparing differing experiences of university life is discussed and the implications for institutional research and practice are considered.

Keywords

Workplace Emotion Health Wellbeing Q methodology Identity 

References

  1. Arnsten, A. F. T. (1998). The biology of being frazzled. Science, 280(5370), 1711–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2011). Current emotion research in organizational behaviour. Emotion Review, 3(2), 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartell, M. (2003). Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework. Higher Education, 45, 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basch, J., & Fisher, C. D. (1998) Affective events-emotion matrix: A classification of work events and associated emotions. Bond School of Business Discussion Papers, Paper 65. Available at http://epublications.bond.edu.au/discussion_papers/65. Accessed 7 June 2011.
  5. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blackmore, J. (2002). Globalisation and the re-structuring of higher education for new knowledge economies: New dangers of old habits troubling gender equity work in universities? Higher Education Quarterly, 56(4), 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bocock, J., & Taylor, R. (2003). The labour party and higher education: The nature of the relationship. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(3), 220–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briner, R. B. (2005). What can research into emotion at work tell us about researching well-being at work? International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 1(1), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, S. R. (1997). The history and principles of Q methodology in psychology and the social sciences. Available at http://facstaff.uww.edu/cottlec/Qarchive/Bps.htm. Accessed 16 June 2011.
  10. Fineman, S. (2000a). Emotional arenas revisited. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (2nd ed., pp. 1–24). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fineman, S. (2000b). Commodifying the emotionally intelligent. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (2nd ed., pp. 101–114). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (2002). Emotions in the workplace: The neglected side of organizational life. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frijda, N. H. (1993). The place of appraisal in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 7(3/4), 357–387.Google Scholar
  14. Frijda, N. H. (2010). Emotion, motive states, appraisal and Kagan: Commentary to Jerome Kagan, what is emotion? Emotion Review, 2(2), 107–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartel, C. E., & Zerbe, W. J. (2000). Reconciling research findings. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. Hartel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory and practice (pp. 215–217). Westport, CA: Quorum.Google Scholar
  16. Heaphy, E. D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008). Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. International Labour Organization. (2010). Emerging risks and new patterns of prevention in a changing world of work. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  18. Izard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kagan, J. (2010). Once more into the breach. Emotion Review, 2(2), 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The job content questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessment of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kinman, G., Jones, F., & Kinman, R. (2006). Wellbeing of the UK Academy 1998–2004. Quality in Higher Education, 12(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Layder, D. (2004). Emotion in social life: The lost heart of society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Leathwood, C., & Hey, V. (2009). Gender/ed discourses and emotional sub-texts: Theorising emotion in UK Higher Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lecouteur, A., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2001). Repertoires of teaching and learning: A comparison of university teachers and students using Q methodology. Higher Education, 42, 205–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin, X., & Leung, K. (2010). Differing effects of coping strategies on mental health during prolonged unemployment: A longitudinal analysis. Human Relations, 63(5), 637–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, G. M., Chen, E., & Cole, S. W. (2009). Health psychology: Developing biologically plausible models linking the social world and physical health. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niedenthal, P. M., & Maringer, M. (2009). Embodied emotion considered. Emotion Review, 1(2), 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitliss, S., et al. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Russell, J. A., & Barratt, L. F. (2009). Editorial. Emotion Review, 1(1), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns in cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smyth, J. (Ed.). (1995). Academic work: The changing labour process in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University.Google Scholar
  37. Stainton Rogers, R. (1995). Q Methodology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Re-thinking methods in psychology (pp. 178–207). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Stephenson, W. (1980). Consciring: A general theory for subjective communicability. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4 (pp. 7–36). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  39. Stets, J. E. (2010). Future directions in the sociology of emotions. Emotion Review, 2(3), 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tran, V., Garcia-Prieto, P., & Schneider, S. C. (2011). The role of social identity, appraisal, and emotion in determining responses to diversity management. Human Relations, 64(2), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tytherleigh, M. Y., Webb, C., Cooper, C. L., & Ricketts, C. (2005). Occupational stress in UK Higher Education Institutions. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wegge, J., van Dick, R., Fisher, G. K., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. F. (2006). A test of basic assumptions of affective events theory (AET) in call centre work. British Journal of Management, 17, 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, S. J. (2000). Reason, emotion and embodiment: Is ‘mental health’ a contradiction in terms? Sociology of Health & Illness, 22(5), 559–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Woods, C. (2010). Employee wellbeing in the higher education workplace: A role for emotion scholarship. Higher Education, 60, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations