Higher Education

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 543–556 | Cite as

Towards transnational academic capitalism

Article

Abstract

This paper contributes to current debates on the relationship between globalisation and higher education. The main argument of the paper is that we are currently witnessing transnationalisation of academic capitalism. This argument is illustrated by examining the collaboration between transnational corporations and research universities, and how transnational academic capitalism has been promoted by different intermediating organizations. On theoretical level the paper draws from global capitalism school and the theory of academic capitalism, but also moves beyond them by introducing new concepts such as knowledge-intensive transnational economic practices. The emergence of transnational academic capitalism challenges the common assumption that universities are primarily promoters of national economic competitiveness.

Keywords

Transnational academic capitalism Transnational corporations Global capitalism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research article was largely written at the University of Georgia (US), The Institute of Higher Education (between August 2010-February 2011) where I worked as a Visiting Fulbright Post Doc Researcher. I want to thank, with the usual disclaimer, Brendan Cantwell, Tuukka Kaidesoja, Rajani Naidoo, and Sheila Slaughter, as well as anonymous referees, for comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

  1. Airaksinen, T. (2010). International companies can boost Finland’s innovation system. Baltic Rim Economies, 3/2010, 23. 6. 2010. http://www.tse.fi/FI/yksikot/erillislaitokset/pei/Documents/BRE2010/BRE%203-2010/BRE_3_2010_17.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2011.
  2. BHEF. (2011). Creating solutions, inspiring action. Business-higher education forum. http://www.bhef.com/. Accessed 17 April 2011.
  3. Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, W. K. (2010). The making of a transnational capitalist class. Corporate power in the 21st century. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  5. Coe, N. M., & Bunnell, T. G. (2003). ‘Spatializing’ knowledge communities: Towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks. Global Networks, 3(4), 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Wit, H., & Knight, J. (1999). Quality and internationalisation in higher education. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  7. Dicken, P. (2007). Global shift (5th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Dunning, J. (1992). Multinational enterprise and the globalisation of innovatory capacity. In O. Granstrand, L. Hakanson, & S. Sjølander (Eds.), Technology management and international business: Internationalisation of R&D and technology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. EC. (2006). Report on the outcomes of the: “Public consultation on transnational research cooperation and knowledge transfer between public research organisations and industry” (draft). European Commission, Brussels, 1 September 2006 M1/FM-DD D(2006). http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/consult_report.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2012.
  10. EC. (2010a). ERA in the knowledge triangle. http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/understanding/what/era_in_the_knowledge_triangle_en.htm. Accessed 31 Jan 2012.
  11. EC. (2010b). An open space for knowledge. http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/understanding/what/what_is_era_en.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2012.
  12. EIT. (2012). Powering European innovation. European Institute of Innovation and Technology. http://eit.europa.eu/kics1/knowledge-and-innovation-communities/overview.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2012.
  13. Enders, J. (2004). Higher education, internationalization, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher Education, 47, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fagelberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2005). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Finpro. (2010). About Finpro. http://www.finpro.fi/en-US/About+Finpro/. Accessed 6 June 2010.
  16. Florida, R. (1997). The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA. Research Policy, 26, 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franco, E., Ray, S., & Ray, P. K. (2011). Patterns of innovation practices of multinational-affiliates in emerging economies: Evidences from Brazil and India. World Development, 39(7), 1249–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerybadze, A., & Reger, G. (1999). Globalization of R&D: Recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, 28, 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grande, E., & Peschke, A. (1998). Transnational cooperation and policy networks in European science policy-making. Research Policy, 28, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granstrand, O. (1999). Internationalization of corporate R&D: A study of Japanese and Swedish corporations. Research Policy, 28, 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guimón, J. (2011). Policies to benefit from the globalization of corporate R&D: An exploratory study for EU countries. Technovation, 31, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jessop, B. (2008). Cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  23. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knight, J., & de Wit, H. (1995). Strategies for internationalization of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives. In H. de Wit (Ed.), Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America. Amsterdam: EAIE.Google Scholar
  25. Kuemmerle, W. (1999a). The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuemmerle, W. (1999b). Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries—Results from a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy, 28, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43, 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mars, M. M., Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2008). The state-sponsored student entrepreneur. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 639–680.Google Scholar
  29. May, C. (2002). The information society. A skeptical view. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  30. Microsoft. (2011). Our research. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/research/default.aspx. Accessed 19 April 2011.
  31. Narula, R., & Zanfei, A. (2005). Globalization and innovation: The role of multinational enterprises. In J. Fagelberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Newman, F., Couturier, L., & Scurry, J. (2004). The future of higher education: Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  33. OECD. (2008). OECD Annual Report 2008. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Developmet. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  34. Olds, K. (2007). Global assemblage: Singapore, foreign universities, and the construction of a ‘‘global education hub’’. World Development, 35(6), 959–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (2000). National systems of innovation under strain: the internationalization of corporate R&D. In R. Barrel, G. Mason, & M. Mahony (Eds.), Productivity, innovation and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  36. Rhoades, G., Maldonado-Maldonado, A., Ordorika, I., & Velazquez, M. (2004). Imagining alternativas to global, corporate, new economy academic capitalism. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 316–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (2004). Academic capitalism in the new economy: Challenges and choices. American Academic, 1(1), 37–60.Google Scholar
  38. Robinson, W. I. (1999). Beyond nation-state paradigms: Globalization, sociology, and the challenge of transnational studies. Sociological Forum, 13(4), 561–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robinson, W. I. (2004). A theory of global capitalism. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  40. RS. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. RS policy document 03/11. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
  41. Sassen, S. (2007). A Sociology of Globalization. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  42. Sell, S. K. (2003). Private power, public law. The globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sklair, L. (2001). Transnational capitalist class. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Sklair, L. (2002). Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Slaughter, S. (2001). Problems in comparative higher education: Political economy, political sociology and postmodernism. Higher Education, 41, 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2011). Transatlantic moves to the market: The United States and the European Union. Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9460-9.
  47. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, J. (2004). Toward a strategy for internationalisation: Lessons and practice from four universities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(2), 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tekes. (2010). FinNode. A gateway to the Finnish innovation ecosystem. http://www.tekes.fi/en/community/FinNode/806/FinNode/1756. Accessed 1 Feb 2012.
  51. UNCTAD. (2005). World Investment Report. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). New York.Google Scholar
  52. UNCTAD. (2008). World Investment Report. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). New York.Google Scholar
  53. van Vught, F. (2011). Responding to the EU innovation strategy. The need for institutional profiling in european higher education and research. In J. Enders, H. F. de Boer & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Reform of higher education in Europe. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  54. von Zedwitz, M., & Gassmann, O. (2002). Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31, 569–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and PhilosophyUniversity of JyväskyläUniversity of JyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations