Higher Education

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 177–191 | Cite as

Roles of women’s higher education institutions in international contexts

Article

Abstract

Women’s colleges and universities persist around the world, even as the vast majority of tertiary institutions are open to men and women. In nearly every nation, women can attend even the most elite formerly all-male universities, and in several nations women are the majority of all college students. Questions therefore arise about the continued need for a single-sex sector in the 21st century. In this study I examined the contribution of these institutions to their national systems of education and society. I used a qualitative, comparative, multiple case study approach to understand 14 diverse women’s colleges and universities in nine nations on five continents. Five key roles emerged: access, campus climate, gender empowerment, leadership development, and cultural paradox. I make recommendations for research and practice.

Keywords

Comparative/international Women’s higher education Qualitative case studies Student leadership Access to higher education Gender equity 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2004). Preface. In F. B. Purcell, R. M. Helms, & L. Rumbley (Eds.), Women’s universities and colleges: An international handbook (pp. ix–x). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Bank, B. J., & Yelon, H. M. (2003). Contradictions in women’s education: Traditionalism, careerism, and community at a single-sex college. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Buchmann, C., & Hannum, E. (2001). Education and stratification in developing countries: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke, R. J., & Mattis, M. C. (2007). Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Upping the numbers. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 924–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. EdStat. (2010). Education statistics. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group. Retrieved August 4, 2011 from: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/ed-stats.
  9. Enke, K. A. E., Winters, K. T., & Ropers-Huilman, R. (2009). Enacting and resisting dominant narratives: Catholic women’s college students’ expectations for future work and family balance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the association for the study of higher education, Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, K. (2008). Top colleges admit fewer low-income students: Pell Grant data show a drop since 2004. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved August 7, 2008 from: http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i34/34a00103.htm.
  11. Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hardwick-Day. (2008). What matters in college after college: A comparative alumnae research study. West Hartford, CT: Women’s College Coalition. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from: http://www.womenscolleges.org/news/pdfs/WCC-What_Matters_March08.pdf.
  13. Jaschik, S. (2008). Converts to leading women’s colleges. InsideHigherEd.com. Retrieved August 7, 2008 from: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/02/15/women.
  14. Kinzie, J., Thomas, A. D., Palmer, M. M., Umbach, P. D., & Kuh, G. D. (2007). Women students at coeducational and women’s colleges: How do their experiences compare? Journal of College Student Development, 48(2), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knight, L. L. (2004). Educating Asian women in women’s colleges and universities: A world perspective. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 10(4), 79–86.Google Scholar
  16. Kolodny, A. (2000). Women and higher education in the twenty-first century: Some feminist and global perspectives. Feminist Formations, 12(2), 130–147.Google Scholar
  17. Kratzok, S. (2010). Tough questions facing women’s colleges. In M. Kramer (Ed.), New directions for higher education (Vol. 151, pp. 49–59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Miller-Bernal, L. (2000). Separate by degree: Women students’ experiences in single-sex and coeducational colleges. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  21. Purcell, F. B., Helms, R. M., & Rumbley, L. (Eds.). (2005). Women’s universities and colleges: An international handbook. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Renn, K. A., & Lytle, J. L. (2010). Women student leaders worldwide: Global perspectives on gender, leadership, and student involvement. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice (formerly NASPA Journal), 47(2), 215–232.Google Scholar
  23. Robinson-Pant, A. (2004). Education for women: Whose values count? Gender and Education, 16(4), 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sahni, R., & Shankar, V. K. (2011). Girls’ higher education in India on the road to inclusiveness: On track but heading where? Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9536-9 .
  25. Saudi king’s university slammed for coed classes. (2009). Associated Press report. Retrieved October 21, 2009 from http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iGpION_unvG8YW_IzI5ECEVJilJgD9B1PKRG3.
  26. Sax, L. J. (2001). Undergraduate science majors: Gender differences in who goes on to graduate school. Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 153–172.Google Scholar
  27. Sen, A. (2004). What’s the point of women’s education? Unpublished remarks, Women’s Education Worldwide 2004: Unfinished Agenda conference, South Hadley, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Stromquist, N. P. (2000). Voice, harmony, and fugue in global feminism. Gender and Education, 12(4), 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stromquist, N. P. (2005). Comparative and international education: A journal toward equality and equity. Harvard Educational Review, 75(1), 89–111.Google Scholar
  30. United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations. Retrieved November 20, 2007 from http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.
  31. UNESCO. (n.d.). Better life, better future. Paris: United Nations. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/pdf/BetterLife_ENG.pdf.
  32. Vavrus, F. (2002). Constructing consensus: The feminist modern and the reconstruction of gender. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
  33. Vavrus, F., & Bartlett, L. (2006). Comparatively knowing: Making a case for the vertical case study. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 8(2), 95–103.Google Scholar
  34. Women’s College Coalition. (2011). Retrieved June 1, 2011 from http://www.womenscolleges.org.
  35. Wolf-Wendel, L. E. (1998). Models of excellence: The baccalaureate origins of successful African American, European American, and Hispanic women. Journal of Higher Education, 69(2), 144–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolf-Wendel, L. (2002). Women’s colleges. In A. M. Martinez Aleman & K. A. Renn (Eds.), Women in higher education: An encyclopedia (pp. 120–122). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher, Adult, & Lifelong EducationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations