Higher Education

, Volume 62, Issue 5, pp 619–633 | Cite as

Honouring the incomparable: honours in Australian universities

  • Margaret Kiley
  • David Boud
  • Catherine Manathunga
  • Robert Cantwell
Article

Abstract

The Honours undergraduate degree in Australia is unlike that in most other countries. It has taken on a particular significance as a qualification, as a pathway to and a pre-requisite for direct entry into doctoral programs. This paper explores the outcomes of a study that suggests that the aims, outcomes, curriculum, pedagogical practices, purposes and enrolment patterns of Honours vary substantially across disciplines and university types. It addresses the questions about the diverse nature of Honours programs and questions what this diversity means for Australian higher education in the context where global standardisation of awards is rapidly occurring. Honours is seen variously as a qualification, an experience, or a program. These variations are discussed and it is demonstrated that Honours globally has not one, but many meanings. These meanings are often poorly understood within, and outside the academy. These multiple meanings create confusion about what Honours stands for and inhibit communication about the role and purpose of Honours both within Australia and in a global context.

Keywords

Research education Curriculum planning Learning outcomes Research skills Student experience 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support for this publication has been provided by The Australian Learning and Teaching Council, an initiative of the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of The Australian Learning and Teaching Council. The authors acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Ida Nursoo, Merrilyn Pike, Anicca Main and Elizabeth Evans.

References

  1. Adler, N., Hellström, T., Jacob, M., & Norrgren, F. (2000). A model for the institutionalization of university-industry partnerships: The FENIX research programme. In M. Jacob & T. Hellström (Eds.), The future of knowledge production in the academy (pp. 125–138). Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. (2004). A responsive evaluation into a small group approach to the supervision of BEd (Hons) students. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Research in Education. http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/and041062.pdf. Accessed March 220.
  3. Armstrong, M., & Shanker, V. (1983). The supervision of undergraduate research: Student perceptions of the supervisor role. Studies in Higher Education, 8(2), 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AV-CC. (1990). Report of the Academic Standards Panel, Physics. Canberra: Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee.Google Scholar
  5. AV-CC. (1991). Report of the Academic Standards Panel, History. Canberra: Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee.Google Scholar
  6. AV-CC. (1992a). Report of the Academic Standards Panel, Economics. Canberra: Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee.Google Scholar
  7. AV-CC. (1992b). Report of the Academic Standards Panel, Psychology. Canberra: Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee.Google Scholar
  8. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham, England: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Enders, J. (2004). Research training and careers in transition: A European perspective on the many faces of the Ph.D. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(3), 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Ministers of Education. (1999). The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999. Bologna: European Commission.Google Scholar
  11. Freegard, P. (2008). The take-up of honours in the School of Humanities. University of Western Australia. http://www.teachingandlearning.uwa.edu.au/__…/AHSS_ISS_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed September 4 2008.
  12. Jacob, M., & Hellström, T. (Eds.). (2000). The future of knowledge production in the academy. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kiley, M., & Austin, A. (2008). Australian postgraduate research students still prefer to ‘stay at home’: Reasons and implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(4), 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kiley, M., Boud, D., Cantwell, R., & Manathunga, C. (2009). The role of Honours in contemporary Australian higher education. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
  15. Kiley, M., Moyes, T., & Clayton, P. (2009b). ‘To develop research skills’: Honours programs for the changing research agenda in Australian universities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manathunga, C., Kiley, M., Boud, D., & Cantwell, R. (in press). From knowledge acquisition to knowledge production: Issues with Australian honours curricula. Teaching in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  17. Millar, C., & Peel, M. (2007). Vocational ventures and robust independence: A review of honours and postgraduate programs in history. History Australia, 4(2), 45.1–45.12. doi:10.2104/ha070045.
  18. Mullins, G. (2004). Report: Progression from Honours to postgraduate research. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  19. Murray.Committee. (1957). Committee on Australian universities report. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  20. Nerad, M., & Heggelund, M. (Eds.). (2008). Toward a Global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  21. QAA Scotland (2007). Compatibility of the framework for qualifications of higher education institutions in Scotland with the European Higher Education Area. Glasgow: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Scotland. http://www.enic-naric.net/documents/QF-Scotland_en.pdf.
  22. University of Queensland. (2003). Report of the Honours working party. Brisbane: University of Queensland. http://www.uq.edu.au/senate/index.html?page=23398. Accessed March 3 2008.
  23. University of Queensland. (2008). Handbook of university policies and procedures, 3.20.14 Award of Honours. Brisbane: University of Queensland. http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25104. Accessed July 13 2010.

Copyright information

© UK Crown: The Australian National University 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret Kiley
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Boud
    • 3
  • Catherine Manathunga
    • 4
  • Robert Cantwell
    • 5
  1. 1.Centre for Educational Development and Academic MethodsThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  3. 3.Communication & Learning GroupUniversity of Technology SydneyBroadwayAustralia
  4. 4.Teaching and Educational Development InstituteThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  5. 5.School of EducationThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations