Higher Education

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 293–308 | Cite as

Differentiation and work: inequality in degree attainment in U.S. higher education

Article

Abstract

While much stratification research has focused on understanding the patterns and consequences of differentiation, previous studies have not considered similarly important variation in students’ trajectories through higher education, and particularly their participation in the labor market. Results from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth of 1997 (NLSY97) indicate that degree completion in a differentiated system of higher education is related to students’ employment patterns. Students who begin their educational journeys in community colleges as well as students from less advantaged family backgrounds are more likely to dedicate longer hours to paid employment, which has negative consequences for degree attainment. Employment patterns contribute to gaps in degree completion among students from different family backgrounds and to a lesser extent to inequality in degree completion between students beginning postsecondary education in community colleges vs. 4-year institutions. A more complex set of patterns is revealed when examining the relationship between employment, family background, and degree attainment across different institutional types and educational credentials. These findings highlight the importance of developing a more comprehensive understanding of inequality in educational attainment by considering the relationship between differentiation and work.

Keywords

Differentiation Higher education Inequality Employment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the Equalsoc EDUC team for insightful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript and the Spencer Foundation for a research grant supporting this project.

References

  1. Alfonso, M. (2006). The impact of community college attendance on baccalaureate attainment. Research in Higher Education, 47(8), 873–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, P. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Ayalon, H., & Shavit, Y. (2004). Educational reforms and inequalities in Israel: The MMI hypothesis revisited. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayalon, H., & Yogev, A. (2005). Field of study and students’ stratification in an expanded system of higher education: The case of Israel. European Sociological Review, 21(3), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, T. L., & Velez, W. (1996). Access to and opportunity in postsecondary education in the United States: A review. Sociology of Education, 69(extra issue), 82–101.Google Scholar
  7. Bozick, R. (2007). Making it through the first year of college: The role of students’ economic resources, employment, and living arrangements. Sociology of Education, 80(3), 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2000). Analyzing educational careers: A multinomial transition model. American Sociological Review, 65(5), 754–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brint, S., & Karabel, J. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cooksey, E. C., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2001). Patterns of work and schooling in young adulthood. Sociological Forum, 16(4), 731–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dougherty, K. (1992). Community colleges and baccalaureate attainment. Journal of Higher Education, 63(2), 188–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dougherty, K. (2001). The contradictory college: The conflicting origins, impacts, and futures of the community college. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dougherty, K., & Kienzl, G. (2006). It’s not enough to get through the open door: Inequalities by social background in transfer from community colleges to four-year institutions. Teachers College Record, 108(3), 452–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellwood, D. T., & Kane, T. J. (2000). Who is getting a college education? Family background and the growing gaps in enrollment. In S. Danziger & J. Waldfogel (Eds.), Securing the future: Investing in children from birth to college (pp. 283–324). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Karen, D. (2002). Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980–1992. Sociology of Education, 75(3), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kerckhoff, A. C. (2001). Educational and social stratification processes in comparative perspective. Sociology of Education, 74(extra issue), 3–18.Google Scholar
  17. Lucas, S. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Monk-Turner, E. (1995). Factors shaping the probability of community vs. four-year college entrance and acquisition of the B.A. degree. The Social Science Journal, 32(3), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mortimer, J. T. (2003). Working and growing up in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mortimer, J. T., & Kruger, H. (2000). Transition from school to work in the United States and Germany: Formal pathways matter. In M. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 475–497). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (1998). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 1995–1996, with an essay on undergraduates who work (NCES 98–084). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  23. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2002). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary institutions: 1999–2000 (NCES 2002–268). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  24. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2003). Community college students: Goals, academic preparation and outcomes (NCES 2003–164). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  25. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2007). The condition of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  26. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2009). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  27. Orszag, J. M., Orszag, P. R., & Whitmore, D. M. (2001). Learning and earning: Working in college. A report commissioned by Upromise Inc. Newton, MA: Upromise Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Riggert, S. C., Boyle, M., Petrosko, J. M., Ash, D., & Rude-Parkins, C. (2006). Student employment and higher education: Empiricism and contradiction. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roksa, J. (2008). Structuring access to higher education: The role of differentiation and privatization. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roksa, J. (2010). Accumulating capital at work: Social class, work during college, and educational success. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  32. Roksa, J., Grodsky, E., Arum, R., & Gamoran, A. (2007). Changes in higher education and social stratification in the United States. In Y. Shavit, R. Arum, & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Stratification in higher education: A comparative study (pp. 165–191). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Roksa, J., & Velez, M. (2010). When studying schooling is not enough: Incorporating employment in models of educational transitions. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott-Clayton, J. (2007). What explains rising labor supply among U.S. undergraduates, 1970–2003? Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  35. Shavit, Y., Arum, R., & Gamoran, A. (2007). Stratification in higher education: A comparative perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Staff, J., & Mortimer, J. T. (2007). Education and work strategies from adolescence to early adulthood: Consequences for educational attainment. Social Forces, 85(3), 1169–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. U.S. Department of Labor. (2007). NLSY97 user guide. Columbus, OH: Center for Human Resource Research.Google Scholar
  40. Whitaker, D. G., & Pascarella, E. T. (1994). Two-year college attendance and socioeconomic attainment: Some additional evidence. Journal of Higher Education, 65(2), 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1984). Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 49(4), 512–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu, L. L. (2003). Event history models for life course analysis. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 477–502). New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations