Higher Education

, Volume 61, Issue 5, pp 545–561

Looking for Professor Right: mentee selection of mentors in a formal mentoring program



Finding a suitable mentor is crucial to the success of mentoring relationships. In the mentoring literature, however, there is conflicting evidence about the best ways to support the pairing process in organisational mentoring programs. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the pairing process in an academic mentoring program that has implications for building a mentoring culture in higher education. The program which began with a pilot and has continued for five years with one hundred and twenty one participants, was conducted with mentees selecting their own mentor from a pool of mentors who volunteered to be part of the program. In the pilot program, where mentors and mentees first met as one group, some mentees reported that the process of selecting and approaching a mentor was uncomfortable and intimidating. Nine of twenty-three potential mentees did not form mentoring relationships. Analysis of subsequent program evaluation data pointed to the importance of two factors in the pairing process: personal connections and facilitation of the selection process. This study at a research-intensive university demonstrates that when the pairing process is tailored to individual mentees, they are comfortable selecting a mentor and to then develop a successful mentoring relationship.


Academic development Flexible mentoring Mentor-mentee choice Pairing process 


  1. Alleman, E., Cochran, J., Doverspike, J., & Newman, I. (1984). Enriching mentoring relationships. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 62, 329–332.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., & Lentz, E. (2006). Mentorship behaviours and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 567–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, S. J., Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (2002). Formal mentoring systems: an examination of the effects of mentor/protégé cognitive styles on the mentoring process. Journal of Management Studies, 39(8), 1111–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.Google Scholar
  5. Benson, C. A., Morahan, P. S., Sachdeva, A. K., & Richman, R. C. (2002). Effective faculty preceptoring and mentoring during reorganisation of an academic medical center. Medical Teacher, 24(5), 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake-Beard, S. D. (2001). Taking a hard look at formal mentoring programs: A consideration of potential challenges facing women. Journal of Management Development, 20(4), 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boice, R. (1992a). Lessons learned about mentoring. New directions for teaching and learning, 50, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boice, R. (1992b). The new faculty member: Supporting and fostering professional development. Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco.Google Scholar
  9. Boice, R. (1993). New faculty involvement for women and minorities. Research in Higher Education, 34(3), 291–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chao, G. T., Walz, P. M., & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, M. (2004). Reconceptualising mentoring: Reflections by an early career researcher. Issues in Educational Research, 14(2), 121–143.Google Scholar
  13. D’Abate, C. P., & Eddy, E. R. (2008). Mentoring as a learning tool: Enhancing the effectiveness of an undergraduate business mentoring program. Mentoring & Tutoring, 16(4), 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehrich, L. C., Hansford, B., & Tennent, L. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 518–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ensher, E. A., & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 460–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ewing, R., Freeman, M., Barrie, S., Bell, A., O’Connor, D., Waugh, F., et al. (2008). Building community in academic settings: The importance of flexibility in a structured mentoring program. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(3), 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferman, T. (2002). Academic professional development practice: What lecturers find valuable. The International Journal for Academic Development, 7(2), 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fives, H., Buehl, M. M., & Myers, S. D. (2008). The cultivation of a professional association-based new faculty mentoring program. In C. A. Mullen (Ed.), The handbook of formal mentoring in higher education: A case study approach (pp. 165–190). Northwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Gardiner, M. (1999). Making a difference: Flinders University mentoring scheme for early career women researchers. Pilot program report. http://www.flinders.edu.au/staffdev/courses/research/resources/Full_report1999.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2009.
  20. Gardiner, M., Tiggemann, M., Kearns, H., & Marshall, K. (2007). Show me the money! An empirical analysis of mentoring outcomes for women in academia. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Girves, J. E., Zepeda, Y., & Gwathmey, J. K. (2005). Mentoring in a post-affirmative action world. Journal of Social Issues, 61(3), 449–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harnish, D., & Wild, L. A. (1994). Mentoring strategies for faculty development. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnsrud, L. K. (1990). Mentor relationships: Those that help and those that hinder. New directions for higher education, 72, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnston, S., & McCormack, C. (1997). Developing research potential through a structured mentoring program: Issues arising. Higher Education, 33(3), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kamvounias, P., McGrath-Champ, S., & Yip, J. (2008). Gifts in mentoring: Mentees’ reflections on an academic development program. International Journal for Academic Development, 13(1), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New Jersey: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lawson, H. A. (1992). Beyond the new conception of teacher induction. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, L., Grimshaw, J., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P., & Graham, I. (2009). Evolution of wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implementation Science, 4(1), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Long, J. (1997). The dark side of mentoring. Australian Educational Researcher, 24(2), 115–133.Google Scholar
  31. Madison, J., Knight, B. A., & Watson, K. (1993). Mentoring amongst academics in Australia: A case study. Australian Educational Researcher, 20(1), 77–91.Google Scholar
  32. Metros, S. E., & Yang, C. (2006). The importance of mentors. Educase www.educause.edu/content.asp?page_id=10631&bhcp=1. Accessed 12 December 2006.
  33. Mullen, C. A. (2008). Conclusion: Mentoring, change, and diversity: Findings and lessons. In C. A. Mullen (Ed.), The handbook of formal mentoring in higher education: A case study approach (pp. 297–319). Northwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Murray, M. (1991). Beyond the myths and magic of mentoring. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Myers, D. W., & Humphreys, N. J. (1985). The caveats in mentorship. Business Horizons, 28, 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quinlan, K. M. (1999). Enhancing mentoring and networking of junior academic women: What, why and how?. Journal of higher education policy and management, 21(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1177–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stanulis, R. N., & Russell, D. (2000). Jumping in: Trust and communication in mentoring student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Treleaven, L. (1994). Making a space: Collaborative inquiry as staff development. In P. Reason (Ed.), Participation in human inquiry (pp. 138–162). London, United Kingdom: SAGE.Google Scholar
  41. University of Sydney. (2009a). http://www.usyd.edu.au/about/profile/pub/facts.shtml. Accessed 7 January 2009.
  42. University of Sydney. (2009b). Statistics Unit http://www.planning.usyd.edu.au/statistics/staff/staff.php?yr=2008&type=1&fac=u. Accessed 7 January 2009.
  43. University of Sydney. (2009c). Statistics Unit http://www.planning.usyd.edu.au/statistics/load/ls08/bfcat.php?fac=6&semind=3&ci=3. Accessed 7 January 2009.
  44. Viator, R. E. (1999). An analysis of formal mentoring programs and perceived barriers to obtaining a mentor at large public accounting firms. Accounting Horizons, 13(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zachary, L. J. (2005). Creating a mentoring culture: The organization’s guide. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Teaching and LearningUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Office of Learning and Teaching in Economics and BusinessUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations