Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing generic skills through university study: a study of arts, science and engineering in Australia

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined relationships between important aspects of a university education and the assessment and development of generic skills. A sample of 323 students enrolled in single or double arts, engineering and/or science degrees from a research-intensive university in Australia were administered the Graduate Skills Assessment to measure four generic skills—critical thinking, interpersonal understandings, problem solving and written communication. As expected, students’ grade point average was generally found to be significantly related to scores for all four skill scales both within each discipline area and across the total sample. Reporting of academic achievement through the GPA therefore provides some measure of students’ generic skill levels. However, since relationships were modest, GPA should be considered an imperfect indicator of levels of generic skills attainment. In addition, we found only limited evidence that students’ skill levels increased with progression through their studies, with study length being consistently related only to Problem Solving. Finally, our analyses revealed significant, interdisciplinary variations in students’ skill scores. Results are discussed with respect to theoretical, practical and methodological implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACNielsen Research Services. (1998). Research on employer satisfaction with graduate skillsinterim report (evaluations and investigations report 98/8). http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/eippubs/eip98-8/execsum.htm. Accessed 23 Nov 2006.

  • Australian Universities Quality Agenda (AUQA). (2006). Audit manual version 3. http://www.auqa.edu.au/qualityaudit/auditmanuals/auditmanual_v3 /audit_manual_3.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2007.

  • Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C. (2004). A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 51, 215–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S., Hughes, C., & Smith, C. (2009). The national graduate attributes project: Key issues to consider in the renewal of learning and teaching experiences to foster graduate attributes. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, R., & Chun, M. (2003). A new field of dreams: The collegiate learning assessment project. Peer Review, 26–29.

  • Bennett, N., Dunne, E., & Carre, C. (1999). Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education. Higher Education, 37, 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). New York: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J., Hart, G., King, B., Trigwell, K., & Watts, O. (2000). Generic capabilities of ATN university graduates. http://www.clt.uts.edu.au/ATN.grad.cap.project.index.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2006.

  • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian Higher Education final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Commonwealth Government of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business/Higher Education Round Table (BHERT). (1992). Educating for excellence (commissioned report no. 2). Camberwell: BHERT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candy, P. C., & Crebert, R. G. (1991). Ivory tower to concrete jungle: The difficult transition from the academy to the workplace as learning environments. Journal of Higher Education, 62, 570–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D., Joughlin, G., Liu, N.-F., et al. (2006). How assessment supports learning: Learning-oriented assessment in action. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanock, K., Clerehan, C., Moore, T., & Prince, A. (2004). Shaping university teaching towards measurement for accountability: Problems of the graduate skills assessment test. Australian Universities Review, 47(1), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clanchy, J., & Ballard, B. (1995). Generic skills in the context of higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 14, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, M., Flynn, R., Thomasson, S., Alexander, R., & McDonald, B. (2007). Graduate employability skills. Canberra: Precision Consultancy. http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/E58EFDBE-BA83-430E-A541-E91BCB59DF1/18858/GraduateEmployabilitySkillsFINALREPORT.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2007.

  • Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C. J., & Cragnolini, V. (2004). Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: Graduates’ perceptions. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). (2002). Striving for quality: Learning, teaching and scholarship. Canberra: DEST.

  • Drummond, I., Nixon, I., & Wiltshire, J. (1998). Personal transferable skills in higher education: The problems of implementing good practice. Quality Assurance in Education, 6, 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyette, K. A., & Mullen, A. L. (2006). Who studies the arts and sciences? Social background and the choice and consequences of undergraduate field of study. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 497–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambur, S., Rowe, K., & Luc, L.T. (2002). Graduate skills assessment: Stage one validity study. http://www.acer.edu.au/tests/university/gsa/documents/GSA_Validity_Study.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2006.

  • Harris, K.-L. (2007). A critical examination of a new Australian performance-based incentive fund for teaching excellence. In K.-L. Harris & B. Longden (Eds.), Funding higher education: A question of who pays? (pp. 60–76). Amsterdam: EAIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.-L., & James, R. (2006). The course experience questionnaire, graduate destinations survey and the learning and teaching performance fund in Australian higher education. Public Policy for Academic Quality. Research Program, UNC. http://www.unc.edu/ppaq/CEQ_final.html. Accessed 8 Apr 2008.

  • Harvey, L., Geall, V., & Moon, S. (1997). Graduates’ work: Implications of organizational change for the development of student attributes. Industry and Higher Education, 11, 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh, A. J. (2000). Recruiting an elite? Employers’ perceptions of graduate education and training. Journal of Education and Work, 13, 245–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, L. (2001). Reconsidering graduate employability: The “graduate identity” approach. Quality in Higher Education, 7, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia (ICAA). (1994). Chartered accountants in the 21st century. Sydney: ICAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities: Ideas, strategies and resources for quality in student assessment. Australian Universities Teaching Committee. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/index.html. Accessed 1 Sept 2008.

  • Kemp, I. J., & Seagraves, L. (1995). Transferable skills—can higher education deliver? Studies in Higher Education, 20, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leckey, J. F., & McGuigan, M. A. (1997). Right tracks–wrong rails: The development of generic skills in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 38, 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Board of Employment, Education and Training (NBEET). (1992). Skills required of graduates: One test of quality in Australian Higher Education (Higher Education Council Commissioned Report No. 20). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusche, D. (2008). Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: A comparative review of selected practices. OECD Education Working Paper No. 15. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/14/8/40257354.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2008.

  • O’Brien, T. (1997). Life after college: employment, further education, lifestyle for recent grads. AAHE Bulletin, 50, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organistation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). OECD feasibility study for the international assessment of higher education learning outcomes (AHELO). http://www.oecd.org/edu/ahelo. Accessed 9 Sept 2008.

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of all members of the project team: Ms. Barbara Hammond, Prof. Richard James, Ass. Prof. Steve James, Ass. Prof. Michelle Livett, Dr. Graham Moore and Ass. Prof. Harald Sondergaard. This project was funded by part of the Teaching and Learning Performance Fund allocation for the University of Melbourne by the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul B. T. Badcock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badcock, P.B.T., Pattison, P.E. & Harris, KL. Developing generic skills through university study: a study of arts, science and engineering in Australia. High Educ 60, 441–458 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9308-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9308-8

Keywords

Navigation