Higher Education

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 301–319 | Cite as

Teacher effects on student attrition and performance in mass-market tertiary education

Article

Abstract

Tertiary education is now accessible even to those who appear unlikely ex ante to succeed in jobs requiring post-high school education. Institutions that have broadened access to their programs must rely on two things to protect the quality of the degrees they award: selection mechanisms operating during students’ tenure, and effective teaching. This paper explores the relative strength of these two forces in a broad-spectrum, first-year undergraduate course. Using detailed data from the University of South Australia on student background, tutors, performance, and enrollment across 15 weeks in a first-year core course, I explore the extent to which teachers impact upon the success of their students directly (through effective teaching) and indirectly (through facilitating the dropping out of more poorly-prepared students). Results indicate that teachers vary widely in their influence on attrition and performance, and that none is robustly effective in facilitating both the disproportionate out-selection of students with poor initial preparation, and the disproportionate achievement of this group. Performance at neither of these tasks is predictable based on teachers’ formal university affiliation.

Keywords

Tutors Teacher quality Attrition Retention Value-added Business education 

References

  1. Averett, S. L., & Burton, M. L. (1996). College attendance and the college wage premium: Differences by gender. Economics of Education Review, 15(1), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, K., & Krumm, V. (1991). Economic literacy in German speaking countries and the United States: First steps to a comparative study. Economia, 1(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, D. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report, Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Brint, S., & Karabel, J. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity, 1900–1985. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buckles, S., & Siegfried, J. J. (2006). Using multiple choice questions to evaluate in-depth learning of economics. Journal of Economic Education, 37(1), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, K., & Sheil, M. (2008). Excellence in research for Australia initiative consultation paper, Australian Research Council, Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, B. R. (1980). The ‘cooling out’ function revisited. In G. B. Vaughan (Ed.), Questioning the community college role (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 32) (pp. 15–31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (1996). The American community college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Cooke, M., & Lang, D. (2009). The effects of monopsony in higher education. Higher Education, 57(5), 623–639. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence, University of Washington Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, Document R-99-1.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, P. (2006). Threshold concepts: how can we recognise them? In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 70–84). Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Dee, T. S. (2005). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. NBER Working Paper 11660.Google Scholar
  14. DEET. (1988). Higher education: A policy statement. Australian Paliamentary Paper, PP 202/88 (‘The Dawkins Paper’). Canberra: Australian Department of Employment, Education and Training.Google Scholar
  15. Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., & Newman, P. (1998). The new palgrave: A dictionary of economics. London: MacMillan Reference.Google Scholar
  16. Evans, M. (1999). School-leavers’ transition to tertiary study: A literature review. Monash University Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Paper 3/99.Google Scholar
  17. Gammie, B., & Gammie, E. (2002). The impact of policy on professional practice in the university sector. The International Journal of Management Education, 2(2), 3–13.Google Scholar
  18. Goldhaber, D. (2006). Everyone’s doing it, but what does teacher testing tell us about teacher effectiveness? University of Washington working paper.Google Scholar
  19. Grogger, J., & Eide, E. (1995). Changes in college skills and the rise in the college wage premium. Journal of Human Resources, 30(2), 280–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffmann, F., & Oreopoulos, P. (2006). Do better professors produce better students? The effects of objective and subjective measures of teacher quality on academic achievement. University of Toronto Department of Economics working paper.Google Scholar
  21. Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. (2006). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. SSRN eLibrary. SSRN. http://ssrn.com/paper=896463.
  22. Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kutieleh, S., Egege, S., & Morgan, D. (2003). To stay or not to stay: Factors affecting international and indigenous students’ decisions to persist with university study and the implications for support services. In K. Deller-Evans & P. Zeegers (Eds.), Language and academic skills in higher education (Vol. 6, pp. 89–98). Student Learning Centre, Flinders University.Google Scholar
  24. Labaree, D. (1997). How to succeed in school without really learning: The credentials race in American education. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Long, M., Ferrier, F., & Heagney, M. (2006). Stay, play, or give it away? Students continuing, changing, or leaving university study in first year, Monash University, ACER Centre for the Economics of Education and Training.Google Scholar
  26. Mayhew, K., Deer, C., & Dua, M. (2004). The move to mass higher education in the UK: Many questions and some answers. Oxford Review of Education, 30(1), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKenna, K. (1994). High school economics in Australia. In W. Walstad (Ed.) An international perspective on economic education (pp. 219–232). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Meyer, J. H. F. (2004). An introduction to the RoLI. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(4), 491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyer, J. W. (1969). The charter: Conditions of diffuse socialization in schools. California Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching.Google Scholar
  30. Meyer, J. W. (1977). The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism in education. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  33. Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, I. (2005). Empowering participants or corroding learning? Towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. NCVER. (2006). A Profile of TAFE institutes. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.Google Scholar
  35. Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.Google Scholar
  36. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rockoff, J. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rowe, K. (2003). The importance of teacher quality as a key determinant of students’ experiences and outcomes of schooling. Background paper to ACER Research Conference.Google Scholar
  39. Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shanahan, M., Foster, G., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2008). Associations among prior acquisition of threshold concepts, learning dimensions, and examination performance in first-year economics. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam and Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Shanahan, M. P., Findlay, J., Cowie, J., Round, D. K., McIver, R., & Barrett, S. (1997). Beyond the ‘input-output’ approach to assessing determinants of student performance in University Economics: Implications from student learning centred research. Australian Economic Papers, Special Issue, 17–37.Google Scholar
  42. Shanahan, M. P., Foster, G., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2006). Operationalising a threshold concept in economics: A first attempt using multiple choice questions on opportunity cost. International Review of Economics Education, 5(2), 29–57.Google Scholar
  43. Shanahan, M. P., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2001). A student learning inventory for economics based on the students’ experience of learning literature. Journal of Economic Education, 32(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  44. TDA. (2004). Funding for TAFE: A TDA position paper. TAFE Directors Australia.Google Scholar
  45. Teichler, U. (1999). Research on the relationships between higher education and the world of work: Past achievements, problems, and new challenges. Higher Education, 38, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walker, I., & Zhu, Y. (2008). The college wage premium and the expansion of higher education in the UK. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(4), 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, R. (2003). From elitism to mass higher education in Taiwan: The problems faced. Higher Education, 46(3), 261–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whitehead, D., & Halil, T. (1989). The test of economic literacy: Standardisation in the U.K. Research Papers in Economics Education. London: Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations