Higher Education

, Volume 59, Issue 6, pp 663–701 | Cite as

Cheating by economics and business undergraduate students: an exploratory international assessment

Article

Abstract

Today’s economics and business students are expected to be our future business people and potentially the economic leaders and politicians of tomorrow. Thus, their beliefs and practices are liable to affect the definition of acceptable economics and business ethics. The empirical evaluation of the phenomenon of cheating in academia has almost exclusively focused on the US context, and non-US studies usually only cover a narrow range of countries. This paper presents a comprehensive, cross-country study on the magnitude and determinants of cheating among economics and business undergraduates, involving 7,213 students enrolled in 42 universities located in 21 countries from the American (4), European (14), Africa (2) and Oceania (1) Continents. We found that the average magnitude of copying among economics and business undergraduates is quite high (62%) but there was significant cross-country heterogeneity. The probability of cheating is significantly lower in students enrolled in schools located in the Scandinavian, and the US and British Isles blocks when compared with their Southern European counterparts; quite surprisingly this probability is also lower for the African block. On a distinctly different level, however, students enrolled in schools in Western and especially Eastern European countries reveal statistically significant higher propensities towards committing academic fraud.

Keywords

Cheating University Economics Business Countries 

References

  1. Antion, D. L., & Michael, W. B. (1983). Short-term predictive validity of demographic, affective, personal, and cognitive variables in relation to two criterion measures of cheating behaviors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcidiacano, P. (2005). Argentina. Procurement: A textbook case. In B. Meier & M. Griffin (Eds.), Stealing the future. Corruption in the classroom: Ten real world experiences, Chap. 3. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  3. Arlow, P., & Ulrich, T. (1985). Business ethics and business school graduates: A longitudinal study. Akron Business and Economic Review, 16, 13–17.Google Scholar
  4. Baird, J. S., Jr. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes, W. F. (1975). Test information: An application of the economics of search. Journal of Economic Education, 7, 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumhart, R. (1961). How ethical are businessmen? Harvard Business Review, 39, 6–31.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 168–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernardi, R. A., Metzger, R. L., Bruno, R. G. S., Hoogkamp, M. A. W., Reyes, L. E., & Barnaby, G. H. (2004). Examining the decision process of students’ cheating behaviour: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bisping, T., Patron, H., & Roskelley, K. (2008). Modeling academic dishonesty: The role of student perceptions and misconduct type. Journal of Economic Education, 39(1), 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bunn, D. N., Caudill, S. B., & Gropper, D. M. (1992). Crime in the classroom: An economic analysis of undergraduate student cheating behavior. Journal of Economic Education, 23, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bushway, A., & Nash, W. R. (1977). School cheating behavior. Review of Educational Research, 47, 623–632.Google Scholar
  13. Cabral-Cardoso, C. (2004). Ethical misconduct in the business school: A case of plagiarism that turned bitter. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callahan, D. (2004). The cheating culture: Why more Americans are doing wrong to get ahead. Florida, US: Harcourt Books.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, W. G. (1931). Student honesty as revealed by reporting of teacher’s errors in grading. School and Society, 33, 97–100.Google Scholar
  16. Campbell, W. G. (1935). A comparative investigation of students under a honor system and a proctor system in the same university. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cole, B., & Smith, D. (1996). Perceptions of business ethics: Students vs. business people. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 889–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collinson, M. (1990). Apparent rise in students’ cheating has college officials worried. The Chronicle of Higher Education (January 17), A33–A35.Google Scholar
  19. Crittenden, V. L., Hanna, R. C., & Peterson, R. A. (2009). The cheating culture: A global societal phenomenon. Business Horizons, 52(4), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crown, D., & Spiller, M. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 683–700.Google Scholar
  21. Daniel, L. G., Blount, K. D., & Ferrell, C. M. (1991). Academic misconduct among teacher education students: A descriptive-correlational study. Research in Higher Education, 32, 703–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty; prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DeConick, J., & Good, D. (1989). Perceptual differences of sales practitioners and students concerning ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 667–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Williams, L. E., Francis, B., & Haines, V. J. (1996). College cheating: Ten years later. Research in Higher Education, 37, 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1999). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fakouri, M. E. (1972). Achievement motivation and cheating. Psychological Reports, 31, 629–630.Google Scholar
  27. Ford, R., & Richardson, W. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardner, W. M., Roper, J. T., Gonzalez, C. C., & Simpson, R. G. (1988). Analysis of cheating on academic assignments. The Psychological Record, 38, 543–555.Google Scholar
  29. Glater, J. (2006). Colleges chase as cheats shift to higher tech. The New York Times (May 18), A1–A24.Google Scholar
  30. Glenn, J. (1988). Business curriculum and ethics: Student attitudes and behavior. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 7(3&4), 167–185.Google Scholar
  31. Glenn, J., Jr., & Van Loo, M. (1993). Business students’ and practitioners’ ethical decisions over time. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 835–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Godfrey, J., & Waugh, R. (1997). Students’ perceptions of cheating in Australian independent schools. Education Australia, 37, 14–16.Google Scholar
  33. Graham, M. A., Monday, J., O’Brien, K., & Steffen, S. (1994). Cheating at small colleges: An examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 255–260.Google Scholar
  34. Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in deceit. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  36. Hernandez, S. (2004). Combating corruption in Argentina. www.duke.edu/web/las/Funding/hernandezpaper.pdf. Accessed May 2006.
  37. Hollon, C. J., & Ulrich, T. A. (1979). Personal business ethics: Managers vs managers-to-be. Southern Business Review, 5, 17–22.Google Scholar
  38. Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Houston, J. P. (1983). College classroom cheating, threat, sex and prior performance. College Student Journal, 16, 229–235.Google Scholar
  40. Houston, J. P. (1986). Classroom answer copying: Roles of acquaintanship and free versus assigned seating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 230–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Houston, J. P., & Ziff, T. (1976). Effects of success and failure of cheating behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hrabak, M., Vujaklija, A., Vodopivec, I., Hren, D., Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2004). Academic misconduct among medical students in a postcommunist country. Medical Education, 38(3), 276–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. IAP—Independent Advocacy Project. (2006). Corruption is Nigeria’s major problem. http://www.ind-advocacy-project.org/Press%20Statements.htm.
  44. Karebenick, S. A., & Srull, T. K. (1978). Effects of personality and situational variation in locus of control on cheating: Determinance of the congruence effect. Journal of Personality, 46, 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kerkvliet, J. (1994). Cheating by economics students: A comparison of survey results. Journal of Economic Education, 25(2), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kerkvliet, J., & Sigmun, C. L. (1999). Can we control cheating in the classroom? Journal of Economic Education, 30(4), 331–351.Google Scholar
  47. Kidwell, L. (2001). Student honor codes as a tool for teaching professional ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 29, 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Klug, M. (1986). Learning to cheat: The interaction of moral-development and social learning theories. Deviant Behavior, 7, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lawson, R. (2004). “Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the “real world”? Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leming, J. S. (1980). Cheating behavior, subject variables, and components of the internal–external scale under high and low risk conditions. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 83–87.Google Scholar
  51. Lord, A. T., & Melvin, K. B. (1997). The attitudes of accounting students, faculty, and employers toward cheating. In L. Ponemon (Ed.), Research on accounting ethics (Vol. 3, pp. 1–20). New York: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  52. Magner, D. (1989). Students urge graduate business schools to emphasize ethical behavior and require courses in standards. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 354(29), A31–A32.Google Scholar
  53. Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: An analysis across countries. Journal of Economic Education, 33, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maramark, S., & Maline, M. (1993). Academic dishonesty among college students. Issues in education. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Office of Research.Google Scholar
  55. May, K. M., & Loyd, B. H. (1993). Academic dishonesty: The honor system and students’ attitudes. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 125–129.Google Scholar
  56. McCabe, D. L. (2005). CAI research. Center for academic integrity. http://academicintegrity.org/cai_research.asp. Accessed Apr 2006.
  57. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2003). Faculty and academic integrity: The influence of current honor codes and past honor code experiences. Research in Higher Education, 44(3), 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McCabe, D., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.Google Scholar
  59. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McCuen, R. H. (2008). The plagiarism decision process: The role of pressure and rationalization. IEEE Transactions on Education, 51, 152–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Meier, B., & Griffin, M. (Eds.). (2005). Stealing the future. Corruption in the classroom: Ten real world experiences. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  63. Michaels, J. W., & Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 870–885.Google Scholar
  64. Millham, J. (1974). Two components of the need for approval score and their relationship to cheating following success and failure. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 378–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nazario, S. L. (1990). Schoolteachers say it’s wrongheaded to try to teach students what’s right. The Wall Street Journal, B1, B8.Google Scholar
  66. Newstrom, J., & Ruch, W. (1976). The ethics of business students: Preparation for a career. AACSB Bulletin, 12(3), 21–29.Google Scholar
  67. Nonis, S., & Swift, C. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nowell, C., & Laufer, D. (1997). Undergraduate student cheating in the fields of business and economics. Journal of Economic Education, 28, 3–12.Google Scholar
  69. Pavela, G., & McCabe, D. L. (1993). The surprising return of honor codes. Planning for Higher Education, 21(4), 27–32.Google Scholar
  70. Pulvers, K., & Diekhoff, G. M. (1999). The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environment. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rettinger, D. A., Jordan, A. E., & Peschiera, F. (2004). Evaluating the motivation of other students to cheat: A vignette experiment. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 873–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rocha, M. F., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2005a). Crime without punishment: An update review of the determinants of cheating among university students. FEP working papers no. 191, Oct 2005.Google Scholar
  73. Rocha, M. F., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2005b). College cheating in Portugal: Results from a large scale survey. FEP working papers no. 197, Dec 2005.Google Scholar
  74. Sheard, J., & Dick, M. (2003). Influences on cheating practice of graduate students in IT courses: What are the factors? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(3), 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sheard, J., Markham, S., & Dick, M. (2003). Investigating differences in cheating behaviours of IT undergraduate and graduate students: The maturity and motivation factors. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sims, R. (1993). The relation between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 207–211.Google Scholar
  77. Smyth, L. S., Davis, J. R., & Kroncke, C. O. (2009). Students' perceptions of business ethics: Using cheating as a surrogate for business situations. Journal of Education for Business, 84(4), 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Spiller, S., & Crown, D. F. (1995). Changes over time in academic dishonesty at the collegiate level. Psychological Reports, 76(3), 763–768.Google Scholar
  79. Stevens, G. E. (1984). Ethical inclinations of tomorrow’s citizens: Actions speak louder? Journal of Business Education, 59, 147–152.Google Scholar
  80. Stickman (2004). Thailand, the future. Stickman weekly 19th September 2004. http://www.stickmanbangkok.com/Weekly/weekly176.html.
  81. Teixeira, A. A. C., & Rocha, M. F. (2006). College cheating in Austria, Portugal, Romania and Spain: A comparative analysis. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(3), 198–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. TI. (2006). Corruption perception index 2005. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International.Google Scholar
  83. Tibbets, S. G. (1999). Differences between women and men regarding decisions to commit test cheating. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ward, D. A., & Beck, W. L. (1990). Gender and dishonesty. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 333–339.Google Scholar
  85. Ward, D. A., & Tittle, C. R. (1993). Deterrence or labeling: The effect of informal sanctions. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 43–64.Google Scholar
  86. Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wood, J., Longenecker, J., McKinney, J., & Moore, C. (1988). Ethical attitude of students and business professionals: A study of moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEF.UPFaculdade Economia, Universidade do Porto; INESC PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Universidade Fernando PessoaPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations