Computer-assisted argument mapping: a rationale approach
- 335 Downloads
Computer-Assisted Argument Mapping (CAAM) is a new way of understanding arguments. While still embryonic in its development and application, CAAM is being used increasingly as a training and development tool in the professions and government. Inroads are also being made in its application within education. CAAM claims to be helpful in an educational context, as a tool for students in responding to assessment tasks. However, to date there is little evidence from students that this is the case. This paper outlines the use of CAAM as an educational tool within an Economics and Commerce Faculty in a major Australian research university. Evaluation results are provided from students from a CAAM pilot within an upper-level Economics subject. Results indicate promising support for the use of CAAM and its potential for transferability within the disciplines. If shown to be valuable with further studies, CAAM could be included in capstone subjects, allowing computer technology to be utilised in the service of generic skill development.
KeywordsComputer-aided argument mapping Critical thinking Argument Inference-making
My thanks to Tim van Gelder, an anonymous referee from the journal, and to St. John’s College at the University of Sydney where I was a Visiting Fellow during 2007.
- Ballard, B., & Clanchy, J. (1988). Studying in Australia. Longman: Cheshire.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).Google Scholar
- Biktimirov, E. N., & Nilson, L. B. (2006). Show them the money: Using mind mapping in the introductory finance course. Journal of Financial Education, 32(Fall), 72–86.Google Scholar
- Cameron, R. (1965). Has economic history a role in an economist’s education? The American Economic Review, 55(1/2), 112–115.Google Scholar
- Commonwealth of Australia. (2000). Employer satisfaction with graduate skills. ACT: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA).Google Scholar
- Donohue, A., van Gelder, T., Cumming, G., & Bissett, M. (2002). Reason! project studies 1999–2002. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Ennis, R. H. (1985). Critical thinking and the curriculum. National Forum, 65, 28–31.Google Scholar
- Ennis, R. H. (1990). The rationality of rationality: Why think critically? In R. Page (Ed.), Philosophy of education 1989 (pp. 402–405). Bloomington, Ill: Philosophy of Education Society.Google Scholar
- Ennis, R. H. (1997). Incorporating critical thinking in the curriculum: An introduction to some basic issues. Inquiry, 16(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching; an integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Graduate Outlook. (2006). Graduate careers Australia. Retrieved 12/10/07, from http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/content/view/full/52.
- Halpern, D. F. (2002). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Harrell, M. (2005). Using argument diagrams to improve critical thinking skills in 80–100 what philosophy is. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/harrell/Harrell_Submission_EISTA2007.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2009.
- Hitchcock, D. (2004). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in critical thinking. Informal Logic, 24(3), 183–218. Google Scholar
- Jefferies, D. (2007). Maths and language. AnnteneX, 118, 1–5.Google Scholar
- Jones, A. (2008). Generic attributes as espoused theory: The importance of context. High Educ. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9189-2
- Knight, P., & Page, A. (2007). The assessment of “wicked” competencies: Report to the practice-based learning centre. Retrieved 5/6/07, from http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/getfile.cfm?documentfileid=11063.
- Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis Carroll Puzzles. (2007). Retrieved 12/10/2007 from http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~hile/math100/logice.htm.
- Martin, G. (1976). Economic motives for the founding of Botany Bay. Australian Economic History Review, 16(2), 128–143.Google Scholar
- Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning, I-outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.Google Scholar
- Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning, II-outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.Google Scholar
- McPeck, J. (1990). Teaching critical thinking: Dialogue and dialectic. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McPeck, J. (1992). Thoughts on subject specificity. In S. Norris (Ed.), The generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspectives on an educational ideal (pp. 198–205). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Melville Jones, H. E. (1999, December). Infusing critical thinking in teaching educational theory. Paper presented at the AARE-NZARE Conference, Melbourne. http://www.aare.edu.au/99pap/mel99107.htm. Accessed 10 March 2009.
- Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Solon, T. (2001). Improving critical thinking in an introductory psychology course. Michigan Community College Journal, 7(2), 73–80.Google Scholar
- Solon, T. (2003). Teaching critical thinking! The more, the better. The Community College Enterprise, 9(2), 25–38.Google Scholar
- Twardy, C. (2004). Argument maps improve critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy, 27(2), 95–116.Google Scholar
- van der Laan, S., & Dean, G. (2007). Assessment to encourage meaningful learning in groups: Concept mapping. Working Paper from the Discipline of Accounting Working Paper Series, the University of Sydney, Australia. http://www.econ.usyd.edu.au/accounting/research.
- van Gelder, T. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 45(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
- van Gelder, T. (2007). The rationale for rationale™. Law, Probability and Risk, 6, 23–42. doi: 10.1093/lpr/mgm032. http://lpr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/6/1-4/23. Accessed 10 March 2009
- van Gelder, T., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Enhancing expertise in informal reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 142–152.Google Scholar
- VanLehn, K. (1996). Cognitive skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 47. In J. Spence, J. Darly & D.J. Foss (Eds.), Annual Reviews (pp. 513–539). Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
- Walton, D. (2000). Problems and useful techniques: My experiences in teaching courses in argumentation, informal logic and critical thinking. Informal Logic, 20(Teaching Supplement 2), 35–39.Google Scholar