Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 81–95 | Cite as

The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education

  • Robert M. Brown
  • Timothy William Mazzarol
Article

Abstract

This paper outlines the findings of a study employing a partial least squares (PLS) structural equation methodology to test a customer satisfaction model of the drivers of student satisfaction and loyalty in higher education settings. Drawing upon a moderately large sample of students enrolled in four ‘types’ of Australian universities, the findings suggest that student loyalty is predicted by student satisfaction, which is in turn predicted by the perceived image of the host university. While the perceived quality of “humanware” (e.g., people and process) and “hardware” (e.g., infrastructure and tangible service elements) has an impact on perceived value, this was found to be weak and indeterminate. Of most importance was the impact of the institution’s institutional image, which strongly predicted perceived value, and to a lesser extent student satisfaction. The findings have implications for newer, less prestigious universities seeking to compete in a more deregulated, market driven environment.

Keywords

Higher education Services marketing Image Partial least squares 

References

  1. AEI. (2003). The economic benefits to Australia from international education. Canberra: Australian Education International, AGPS.Google Scholar
  2. AEI-NOOSR. (2006). Country Education Profile—Australia. Canberra, Australian Education International—National Office of Overseas Skills Recognition, Government of Australia, AGPS.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Senate. (2001). Universities in crisis. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Bayol, M.-P., Foye, A., de la Tellier, C., & Tenenhaus, M. (2000). Use of PLS path modeling to estimate the European consumer satisfaction index (ECSI) model. Statistica Applicata (Italian Journal of Applied Statistics), 12(3), 361–375.Google Scholar
  5. Brady, M. K., Cronin, J. J., & Brand, R. R. (2002). Performance-only measurement of service quality: A replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, 55(1), 17–31. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00171-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, R. M. (2006). Drivers of student satisfaction and student loyalty in an Australian university setting, PhD Thesis, UWA [online available] http://theses.library.uwa.edu.au/adt-WU2007.0060/.
  7. Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: Review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), 8–32. doi: 10.1108/03090569610105762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassel, C. M., & Eklof, J. A. (2001). Modelling customer satisfaction and loyalty on aggregate levels: Experience from the ECSI pilot study. Total Quality Management, 12(7&8), 834–841.Google Scholar
  9. Chapleo, C. (2007). Barriers to brand building in UK universities. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(1), 23–32. doi: 10.1002/nvsm.271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55–68. doi: 10.2307/1252296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125–131. doi: 10.2307/1252256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cronin, J. J., Brady, M., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DEET. (1993). National report on Australia’s higher education sector. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training, AGPS.Google Scholar
  16. DEST. (2006a). Learning, teaching performance fund 2006: Administrative information for providers. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
  17. DEST. (2006b). Research Quality Framework, Department of Education, Science and Training, viewed 19 April 2006, http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/policies_issues_reviews/key_issues/research_quality_framework/default.htm.
  18. European Organisation for Quality. (2001). European Customer Satisfaction Index, European Organisation for Quality, viewed 9 May 2001, http://www.eoq.org/ECSI.html.
  19. Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7–18. doi: 10.2307/1251898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: An examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 65–87. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.64.3.65.18028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hennig-Thurau, T., Langer, M. F., & Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and managing student loyalty: An approach based on the concept of relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(4), 331–344. doi: 10.1177/109467050134006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. IDP. (2006). Australia’s exports of education services. IDP Education Australia [online]. www.idp.com.
  23. Jackson, F. (2002). A better way. Eureka Street, 12(5), 16–18.Google Scholar
  24. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02291575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King, S. P. (2001). The funding of higher education in Australia: Overview and alternatives. The Australian Economic Review, 34(2), 190–194. doi: 10.1111/1467-8462.00188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kristensen, K., Martensen, A., & Gronholdt, L. (2000). Customer satisfaction measurement at Post Denmark: Results of application of the European customer satisfaction index methodology. Total Quality Management, 11(7), 1007–1015. doi: 10.1080/09544120050135533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marginson, S. (1997). Competition and contestability in Australian higher education, 1987–1997. Australian Universities Review, 40(1), 5–14.Google Scholar
  28. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Martensen, A., Gronholdt, L., & Kristensen, K. (2000). The drivers of customer satisfaction and loyalty: Cross-industry findings from Denmark. Total Quality Management, 11(4/5 & 6), 544–553.Google Scholar
  30. Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (1999). Sustainable competitive advantage for educational institutions: A suggested model. International Journal of Educational Management, 13(6), 287–300. doi: 10.1108/09513549910294496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). The global market for higher education: Sustainable competitive strategies for the new millennium. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. Meek, V. L., & Wood, F. Q. (1998). Managing higher education diversity in a climate of public sector reform. Canberra: Evaluations and Investigations Programme, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  33. Moodie, G. (2001). Making up the numbers. The Australian, 15(August), 31.Google Scholar
  34. Nelson, B. (2002). Higher education at the crossroads: An overview paper. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
  35. Nelson, B. (2005). Higher education report 2004–05. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
  36. O’Reilly, B. (2002). Education and training: How does Australia compare internationally? 1301.0 year book Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  37. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.Google Scholar
  38. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Perceived service quality as a customer-based performance measure: An empirical examination of organizational barriers using an extended service quality model. Human Resource Management, 30(3), 335–364. doi: 10.1002/hrm.3930300304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poole, M., Harman, E., Snell, W., Deden, A., & Murray, S. (2000). ECU Service 2000: A client-centred transformation of corporate services, 00/16. Canberra: Evaluations and Investigations Programme, Higher Education Division, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  40. Rundle-Thiele, S. (2005). Elaborating customer loyalty: Exploring loyalty to wine retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12(5), 333–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sweeney, J., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple-item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tandukar, A. (2007). Expatriates call for university system overhaul. Business Review Weekly, 29(1), 9.Google Scholar
  43. Teas, R. K. (1994). Expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: An assessment and reassessment. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 132–139. doi: 10.2307/1252257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. TIAC (2000). Export of western Australian education and training: Constraints and opportunities. Perth www.wa.gov.au/tiac, Technology Industry Advisory Council.
  45. Turner, J. (1999). University preference: A conjoint analysis, Masters thesis, Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
  46. Ville, S., Valadkhani, A., & O’Brien, M. (2006). The distribution of research performance across Australian universities, 1992–2003, and its implications for building diversity. Australian Economic Papers, 45(4), 343–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8454.2006.00298.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Westlund, A. H., Cassel, C. M., Eklof, J., & Hackl, (2001). Structural analysis and measurement of customer perceptions, assuming measurement and specification errors. Total Quality Management, 12(7/8), 873–881. doi: 10.1080/09544120120095990.Google Scholar
  48. Yu, Y.-T., & Dean, A. (2001). The contribution of emotional satisfaction to consumer loyalty. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(3), 234–250. doi: 10.1108/09564230110393239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zemsky, R., Wegner, G. R., & Massy, W. F. (2005). Remaking the American university: Market-smart and mission-centered. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations