Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Promoting student-centred forms of learning across an entire university

  • David KemberEmail author
Article

Abstract

Many academics see themselves primarily as experts in their discipline and hold content-oriented conceptions of teaching. It can then be difficult to persuade them to adopt forms of teaching incorporating active student engagement, even though there is evidence for the effectiveness of such forms of learning. This article describes a university-wide initiative to promote student-centred forms of teaching and learning. The campaign included: models of good practice from award-winning teachers, compulsory teachers training courses for new junior teachers and teaching assistants, projects funded by teaching development grants, a diagnostic programme-level survey accompanied by counselling over results and programme reviews. Evidence of impact comes from the overall university-level results of the programme survey, which showed marked increases, over a 2 year period, on each of the nine scales used to obtain feedback on the quality of the teaching and learning environment.

Keywords

Student-centred learning Active learning Quality enhancement Conceptions of teaching Teaching and learning environment 

References

  1. Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does? Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Champagne, A. B., Gunstone, R. F., & Klopfer, L. E. (1985). Effecting change in cognitive structures among physics students. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structures and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Eitington, J. E. (2002). The winning trainer: Winning ways to involve people in learning (4th ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  5. Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87–100. doi: 10.1177/1469787404040463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 20–33.Google Scholar
  7. Ho, A. S. P. (1998a). A conceptual change staff development programme: Effects as perceived by the participants. The International Journal for Academic Development, 3(1), 24–38. doi: 10.1080/1360144980030105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ho, A. S. P. (1998). Changing teachers’ conceptions of teaching as an approach to enhancing teaching and learning in tertiary education. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  9. Ho, I. T. (2001). Are Chinese teachers authoritarian? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and instructional perspectives (pp. 97–112). Hong Kong/Melbourne: Comparative Education Research Centre/Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  10. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualization of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255–275. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kember, D. (2000). Action learning and action research: Improving the quality of teaching and learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  12. Kember, D. (2002). Long term outcomes of educational action research projects. Educational Action Research, 10(1), 83–103. doi: 10.1080/09650790200200174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 58–74. doi: 10.2307/2943877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kember, D., & Kwan, K. P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. In N. Hativa & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar
  15. Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2005a). The influence of active learning experiences on the development of graduate capabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 157–172. doi: 10.1080/03075070500043127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2005b). The influence of the teaching and learning environment on the development of generic capabilities needed for a knowledge-based society. Learning Environments Research, 8, 245–266. doi: 10.1007/s10984-005-1566-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (in press). Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. Learning Environments Research. Google Scholar
  18. Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & Kwan, K. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 411–425. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000009294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & Ma, R. S. F. (2007). Characterising learning environments capable of nurturing generic capabilities in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 48(5), 609–632. doi: 10.1007/s11162-006-9037-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kember, D., Ma, R. S. F., McNaught, C., & 18 Excellent teachers. (2006). Excellent university teaching. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kember, D., & McKay, J. (1996). Action research into the quality of student learning: A paradigm for faculty development. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(5), 528–554. doi: 10.2307/2943867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kember, D., & McNaught, C. (2007). Enhancing university teaching: Lessons from research into award winning teachers. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Lammers, L. J., & Murphy, J. J. (2002). A profile of teaching techniques used in the university classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1177/1469787402003001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leung, D. Y. P., & Kember, D. (2005). The influence of the part-time study experience on the development of generic capabilities. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29, 91–101. doi: 10.1080/03098770500103101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leung, D. Y. P., & Kember, D. (2006). The influence of teaching approach and teacher-student interaction on the development of graduate capabilities. Structural Equation Modelling, 13, 164–186. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1302_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253–388. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Sheppard, C., & Gilbert, J. (1991). Course design, teaching method and student epistemology. Higher Education, 22, 229–249. doi: 10.1007/BF00132289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. T. Westa & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1003548313194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Hong KongPokfulam RoadHong Kong

Personalised recommendations