Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 463–475 | Cite as

The development of learning patterns of student teachers: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

  • Vincent Donche
  • Peter Van Petegem
Article

Abstract

Research on learning pattern development during pre-service teacher education is scarce. In a cross-sectional (study 1) and longitudinal study (study 2) the development of learning patterns of student teachers is analysed. Participants in study 1 were 646 first-year and 350 third-year student teachers enrolled in an initial pre-service teacher education programme. 236 student teachers participated in study 2. Vermunt’s’ Inventory of Learning Styles was used to assess differences in learning patterns. By examining intra-individual changes in learning patterns we expected to find developmental trends within learning patterns. Results show that meaning oriented learning increases over time and undirected learning decreases. Some learning patterns are however more subject to change than others. The development of learning patterns was found to be relative and dependent on the learning pattern which students have already mastered in the first-year of a teacher education programme.

Keywords

Learning conception Learning pattern Learning style Longitudinal study Self-regulation Student learning Student teacher Teacher education 

References

  1. Ajisuksmo, C. R. P. (1996). Self-regulated learning in Indonesian Higher Education. Jakarta: Atma Jaya Research Centre.Google Scholar
  2. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  3. Bijleveld, C., van der Kamp, L., & Mooijaart, A. (1998). Longitudinal data analysis: Designs, models and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Birenbaum, M. (1997). Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations. Higher Education, 33, 71–84. doi: 10.1023/A:1002985613176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle, E. A., Duffy, T., & Dunleavy, K. (2003). Learning styles and academic outcome: The validity and utility of Vermunt’s inventory of learning styles in a British higher education setting. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 267–290. doi: 10.1348/00070990360626976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brouwer, N., & Korthagen, F. (2005). Can teacher education make a difference? American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 153–224. doi: 10.3102/00028312042001153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1998). Learning styles: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 427–441.Google Scholar
  8. Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1999). The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 427–441.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Dippelhofer-Stiem, B. (1989). The development of research-oriented learning in five European countries. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2005). Assessing pre-service teachers’ orientations to learning to teach and preferences for learning environments. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, 42(1), 27–52.Google Scholar
  12. Entwistle, N. (1988). Motivational factors in students’ approaches to learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 21–51). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. Entwistle, N. (1998). Improving teaching through research on student learning. In J. J. F. Forest (Ed.), University teaching: International perspectives (pp. 72–112). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  14. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  15. Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: unravelling basic components and dimensions, advances in learning and instruction series (pp. 89–107). Amsterdam/Boston/London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  16. Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Geisler-Brenstein, E., Schmeck, R. R., & Hetherington, J. (1996). An individual difference perspective on student diversity. Higher Education, 31, 73–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00129108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grossman, P. L. (1992). Why models matter: An alternate view of professional growth in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 62, 171–179.Google Scholar
  19. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences in learning and instruction. New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as a source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Messick, S. (1996). Cognitive styles and learning. In E. De Corte & F. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 638–641). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, J. H. F., & Muller, M. W. (1990). Evaluating the quality of student learning. An unfolding analysis of the association between perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying at an individual level. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 131–155. doi: 10.1080/03075079012331377471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nettle, E. B. (1998). Stability and change in the beliefs of student teachers during practice teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(2), 193–204. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00031-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oosterheert, I. E., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). Individual differences in learning to teach: Relating cognition, regulation and affect. Learning and Instruction, 11(2), 133–156. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00019-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 128–148.Google Scholar
  26. Perry, W. J. (1999). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in college years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Richardson, J. T. E. (2004). Methodological issues in questionnaire-based research on student learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 347–358.Google Scholar
  28. Sadler-Smith, E. (1996). Approaches to studying: Age, gender and academic performance. Educational Studies, 22(3), 367–379. doi: 10.1080/0305569960220306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Säljö, R. (1979). Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8, 443–451. doi: 10.1007/BF01680533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Severiens, S., Ten Dam, G., & Van Hout Wolters, B. (2001). Stability of processing and regulation strategies. Two longitudinal studies on student learning. Higher Education, 42, 437–453. doi: 10.1023/A:1012227619770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31, 97–116. doi: 10.1007/BF00129109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Petegem, P., & Donche, V. (2006). Learning environment research in higher education. Assessing patterns of learning and teaching. In D. Fisher & M. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: Worldviews (pp. 93–124). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  33. Van Petegem, P., Donche, V., & Vanhoof, J. (2005). Relating preservice teachers’ approaches to learning and preferences for constructivist learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 8(3), 309–332. doi: 10.1007/s10984-005-1564-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (1999). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education, 37, 1–21. doi: 10.1023/A:1003573727713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vermetten, Y. J., Vermunt, J. D., & Lodewijks, H. G. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How do university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12, 263–284. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00013-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vermunt, J. D. H. M. (1992). Leerstijlen en sturen van leerprocessen in het hoger onderwijs–naar procesgerichte instructie in zelfstandig denken. [Learning styles and regulation of learning in higher education–toward process-oriented instruction in autonomous thinking]. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  37. Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.Google Scholar
  38. Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher education, 46(3), 205–236. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6664-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vermunt, J. D., & Minnaert, A. (2003). Dissonance in student learning patterns: When to revise theory? Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 49–61. doi: 10.1080/03075070309301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–385.Google Scholar
  41. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimise an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244. doi: 10.2307/2282967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (1981). The learning processes of Australian university students: Investigations of contextual and personological factors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(3), 384–393.Google Scholar
  43. Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.Google Scholar
  44. Wierstra, R. F. A., & Beerends, E. P. M. (1996). Leeromgevingspercepties en leerstrategieën van eerstejaars studenten sociale wetenschappen. [Perceptions of the learning environment and learning strategies of first-year students of social sciences]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 21(4), 306–322.Google Scholar
  45. Wood, K. (2000). The experience of learning to teach: Changing student teachers’ ways of understanding teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(1), 75–93. doi: 10.1080/002202700182862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Education and Information SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium

Personalised recommendations