Higher Education

, 57:1 | Cite as

European graduates’ level of satisfaction with higher education

  • Adela García-Aracil


In this paper we investigate satisfaction rates among young European higher education graduates with their tertiary level study. Ordered choice models are used to parse out those factors that influence study satisfaction, such as environmental factors, field of study, usefulness of study and other individual-specific characteristics. Results show that those graduates who were most satisfied with their course of study scored course content and social aspects very highly, while opportunity to participate in research projects and poor supply of teaching materials were among the main reasons for dissatisfaction with higher education studies.


Curriculum design and development Student satisfaction 


  1. Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2004). La medición de la satisfacción en la enseñanza universitaria: El ejemplo de la Universidade da Beira Interior. Revista Internacional de Marketing Público y No Lucrativo, 1(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arambewela, R., & Hall, J. (2001). Post choice satisfaction among international postgraduate students from Asia studying in Victorian universities. Proceedings of the Conference of ANZMAC, Albany, 1–5, December.Google Scholar
  3. Athiayaman, A. (1997). Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions: The case of university education. European Journal of Marketing, 31(7), 528–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battu, H., Belfield, C. R., & Sloane, P. J. (1999). Overeducation among graduates: A cohort view. Education Economics, 7(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bean, J. P., & Vesper, N. (1994). Gender differences in college student satisfaction. Association for the Study of Higher Education Conference Paper, Tucson.Google Scholar
  6. Berdie, R. F. (1971). Self-claimed and tested knowledge. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birenbaum, M. (2007). Assessment and instruction preferences and their relationship with test anxiety and learning strategies. Higher Education, 53(6), 749–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birenbaum, M., & Feldman, R. A. (1998). Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1), 90–97.Google Scholar
  9. Chalmers, D. (2007). A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. Australia: Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  10. DiBiase, D. (2004). The impact of increasing enrolment on faculty workload and student satisfaction over time. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 45–60.Google Scholar
  11. Drew, T. L., & Work, G. G. (1998). Gender-based differences in perception of experiences in higher education: gaining a broader perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 69(5), 512–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot, K. M., & Healy, M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ewell, P. T., Lovell, C. D., Dressier, P., & Jones, D. P. (1994). A preliminary study of the feasibility and utility for national policy of instructional good practice indicators in undergraduate education (NCES, No. 94437). Washington, DC, US: Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  14. García-Aracil, A., Gabaldón, D., Mora, J. G., & Vila, L. E. (2007). The relationship between life goals and field of study among young European graduates. Higher Education, 53(6), 843–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giese, J. L., & Cote, J. A. (2000). Defining customer satisfaction. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 00(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
  16. Green, W. H. (1997). Econometric analysis (3rd edn.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Hartman, D. E., & Schmidt, S. L. (1995). Understanding student/alumni satisfaction from a consumer’s perspective: The effects of institutional performance and program outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 36(2), 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harvey, L. (1995). Student satisfaction. The New Review of Academic Librarianship, 1, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hesli, V. L., Fink, E. C., & Duffy, D. M. (2003). Mentoring in a positive graduate student experience: Survey results from the Midwest region, Part 1. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(3), 457–460.Google Scholar
  20. Hill, F. M. (1995). Managing service quality in higher education: The role of student as primary consumer. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(1), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. LeBlanc, G., & Nguyen, N. (1997). Searching for excellence in business education: An exploratory study of customer impressions of service quality. International Journal of Educational Management, 11(2), 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. LeBlanc, G., & Nguyen, N. (1999). Listening to the customer’s voice: Examining perceived service value among business college students. International Journal of Educational Management, 13(4), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martensen, A., Gronholdt, L., Eskildsen, J., & Kristensen, K. (1999). Measuring student oriented quality in higher education: applied of the ECSI methodology. Conference Proceedings from TQM for Higher Education Institutions: Higher Education Institutions and the Issue of Total Quality, Verona, 30–31, August.Google Scholar
  25. Marzo-Navarro, M., Pedraja-Iglesias, M., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2005). A new management element for universities: Satisfaction with the offered courses. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(6), 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miroswsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1989). Social causes of psychological distress. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  27. National Survey of Student Engagement (2007). NSSE annual report 2007: Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success,
  28. O’Neill, M., & Palmer, A. (2004). Importance-performance analysis: A useful tool for directing continuous improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oosterbeek, H. (1992): Essays on human capital theory. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Patti, M. V., Tarpley, R. S., Goree, C. T., & Tice, G. E. (1993). The relationship of college characteristics and services to student retention and satisfaction. Paper presented at the Mid-South Educational Research Association Meeting, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  31. Pike, G. R. (1996). Limitations of using students’ selfreports of academic development as proxies for traditional achievement measures. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8(4), 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richardson, J. T. (1994). A British evaluation of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Richardson, J. T. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rhodes, C., & Nevill, A. (2004). Academic and social integration in higher education: A survey of satisfaction and dissatisfaction within a first-year education studies cohort at a new university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(2), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schomburg, H., & Teichler, U. (2006). Higher education and graduate employment in Europe: Results of graduate survey from twelve countries. Higher education dynamics (Vol. 15). Springer: Netherlands.Google Scholar
  38. Symons, R. (2006). In their own words: Finding out what students think about their university learning experience. Synergy, 23, 34–35.Google Scholar
  39. Ting, K. (2000). A multilevel perspective on student ratings of instruction: Lessons from the Chinese experience. Research in Higher Education, 41(5), 637–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. (2004). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vila, L. E., García-Aracil, A., & Mora, J. G. (2007). The distribution of job satisfaction among young European graduates: Does the choice of study field matter? Journal of Higher Education, 78, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wiers-Jenssen, J., Stensaker, B., & Grogaard, J. B. (2002). Student satisfaction: Towards and empirical desconstruction of the concept. Quality in Higher Education, 8(2), 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson, K., Lizzion, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación, Institute for Innovation and Knowledge ManagementINGENIO (CSIC-UPV)ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations