European graduates’ level of satisfaction with higher education
- 884 Downloads
In this paper we investigate satisfaction rates among young European higher education graduates with their tertiary level study. Ordered choice models are used to parse out those factors that influence study satisfaction, such as environmental factors, field of study, usefulness of study and other individual-specific characteristics. Results show that those graduates who were most satisfied with their course of study scored course content and social aspects very highly, while opportunity to participate in research projects and poor supply of teaching materials were among the main reasons for dissatisfaction with higher education studies.
KeywordsCurriculum design and development Student satisfaction
- Arambewela, R., & Hall, J. (2001). Post choice satisfaction among international postgraduate students from Asia studying in Victorian universities. Proceedings of the Conference of ANZMAC, Albany, 1–5, December.Google Scholar
- Bean, J. P., & Vesper, N. (1994). Gender differences in college student satisfaction. Association for the Study of Higher Education Conference Paper, Tucson.Google Scholar
- Birenbaum, M., & Feldman, R. A. (1998). Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1), 90–97.Google Scholar
- Course Experience Questionnaire (2007). CEQ National Results, http://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/content.asp?page=/policies_programs/graduates/index.htm.
- Chalmers, D. (2007). A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. Australia: Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.Google Scholar
- DiBiase, D. (2004). The impact of increasing enrolment on faculty workload and student satisfaction over time. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 45–60.Google Scholar
- Ewell, P. T., Lovell, C. D., Dressier, P., & Jones, D. P. (1994). A preliminary study of the feasibility and utility for national policy of instructional good practice indicators in undergraduate education (NCES, No. 94437). Washington, DC, US: Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
- Giese, J. L., & Cote, J. A. (2000). Defining customer satisfaction. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 00(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
- Green, W. H. (1997). Econometric analysis (3rd edn.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Hesli, V. L., Fink, E. C., & Duffy, D. M. (2003). Mentoring in a positive graduate student experience: Survey results from the Midwest region, Part 1. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(3), 457–460.Google Scholar
- Martensen, A., Gronholdt, L., Eskildsen, J., & Kristensen, K. (1999). Measuring student oriented quality in higher education: applied of the ECSI methodology. Conference Proceedings from TQM for Higher Education Institutions: Higher Education Institutions and the Issue of Total Quality, Verona, 30–31, August.Google Scholar
- Miroswsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1989). Social causes of psychological distress. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- National Survey of Student Engagement (2007). NSSE annual report 2007: Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success, http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2007_Annual_Report/.
- Oosterbeek, H. (1992): Essays on human capital theory. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
- Patti, M. V., Tarpley, R. S., Goree, C. T., & Tice, G. E. (1993). The relationship of college characteristics and services to student retention and satisfaction. Paper presented at the Mid-South Educational Research Association Meeting, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Schomburg, H., & Teichler, U. (2006). Higher education and graduate employment in Europe: Results of graduate survey from twelve countries. Higher education dynamics (Vol. 15). Springer: Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Symons, R. (2006). In their own words: Finding out what students think about their university learning experience. Synergy, 23, 34–35.Google Scholar