Higher Education

, 55:285 | Cite as

Engaging first year students using a Web-supported inquiry-based learning setting

Article

Abstract

This paper describes a study that explored the utility and efficacy of the application of a Web-based tool to promote learner engagement among first year students in a large class in an undergraduate communications degree. The Web-based tool was developed to support an inquiry-based learning approach that was characterised by strong learning scaffolds, meaningful contexts, feedback and support and administrative efficiencies. The study explored the forms of engagement that the Web-supported inquiry-based learning approach was able to engender among first year undergraduate students and the factors that were found to influence students’ levels of engagement and achievement in the approach.

Keywords

e-Learning Inquiry-based learning First year students Higher education Web-based learning 

References

  1. Anderson L.W., & Krathwohl D.R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessment: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  2. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bligh, J. (1995). Problem-based learning in medicine: An introduction. Post-Graduate Medical Journal, 71(8), 323–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom, B. (1956). (Eds.). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  5. Boud, D., & Prosser, M. (2002). Key principles for high quality student learning in higher education: A framework for evaluation. Educational Media International, 39 (3), 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calder, A., & Hanley, P. (2004). Transition—helping students bridge the gap. Issues of Teaching and Learning @ JCU, 2(2). Retrieved January 2005, from http://www.jcu.edu.au/office/tld/teachingsupport/documents/TLD_vol2_issue2.pdf.Google Scholar
  7. Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  8. Dolmans, D. (1992). The relationship between student-generated learning issues and self-study in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 22 (4), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fogarty, R. (1997). Problem-based learning and other curriculum models for the multiple intelligences classroom. ERIC Document No. ED405143.Google Scholar
  10. Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodyear, P. (2005). The emergence of a networked learning community: Lessons learned from research and practice. In G. Kearsley (Ed.), Online learning: Personal reflections on the transformation of education (pp. 113–127). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Boston, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jonassen, D. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved July, 2003, from http://home.sprynet.com/∼gkearsley/engage.htm.Google Scholar
  15. Kearsley G. (2005). (Eds.). Online learning: Personal reflections of the transformation of education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Kingsland, A. (1996). Time expenditure, workload, and student satisfaction in problem-based learning. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (pp.73-81). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59–71.Google Scholar
  18. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  19. McInnis, C., James, R., & Hartley, R. (2000). Trends in the first year experience in Australian Universities. DETYA: Canberra.Google Scholar
  20. Oliver, R. (2005). Using blended learning approaches to support problem-based learning with first year students in large undergraduate classes. In C. K. Looi, D. Jonassen, M. Ikeda (Eds.), Towards sustainable and scalable educational innovations informed by the learning sciences. (pp 848–851). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16 (2), 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schiller, J., Ostwald, M., & Chen, S. (1994). Implementing a problem-based, distance education undergraduate course in construction management. Distance Education, 15(2), 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott, J., Buchanan, J., & Haigh, N. (1997). Reflections of student-centred learning in a large class setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28 (1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tynjala, P., Valimaa, J., & Sarja, A. (2003). Pedagogical perspectives on the relationship between higher education and working life. Higher Education, 46(2), 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Communications and Creative IndustriesEdith Cowan UniversityMt LawleyWestern Australia

Personalised recommendations