College application behavior: who is strategic? Does it help?
- 203 Downloads
The paper examines whether college application behavior assists members of privileged social groups to preserve their advantages in diversified higher education systems. The study is based on a survey conducted in Israel in 1999 on a sample of 4,061 freshmen in the research universities and the academic colleges, which are often perceived as the second tier of higher education. The findings show that strategic application behavior helps less able children of academic parents to achieve the summit of higher education: studying lucrative fields of study at the research universities. Mizrachim, the disadvantaged Jewish ethnic group, are strategic when applying for lucrative fields of study, but it does not affect their actual enrollment. Strategic application behavior helps Arabs, the most disadvantaged group in Israel, increase their odds of achieving the “worst” option, studying non-lucrative fields in colleges. Talented women successfully practice strategic behavior when applying for lucrative fields of study. The effects of strategic application behavior are, thus, mixed. It helps in preserving socio-economic and ethnic inequalities, but also helps in reducing gender inequality among talented students.
KeywordsCollege application behavior Single and multiple applications Qualitative aspect of multiple applications Inequality in higher education Fields of study First-tier and second-tier institutions
I thank Limor Gerbat, Moshe Lavi, and Timna Ziv for their research assistance, and the anonymous reviewers of Higher Education for their helpful comments.
- Al-Haj, M. (1995). Education, empowerment, and control: The case of the Arabs in Israel. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Alon, S. (2001). Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in college destination, 1982 and 1992 (Working Paper No. 2001-02). Princeton, NJ: Office of Population Research.Google Scholar
- Ambler, J. S., & Neathery, J. (1999). Educational policy and equality: Some evidence from Europe. Social Science Quarterly, 80(3), 437–456.Google Scholar
- Ayalon, H., Grodsky, E., Gamoran, A., & Yogev, A. (2000). Stratification and diversity in higher education: A comparison between Israel and the United States. Paper presented at the meeting of the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility of the International Sociological Association, Lilbourn, France.Google Scholar
- Ayalon, H., & Yogev, A. (2002). Window to the academic world. Research report submitted to the Israeli Ministry of Education and Culture (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis in behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gerber, T. P., & Schaffer, D. R. (2004). Horizontal stratification of higher education in Russia: Trends, gender differences, and labor market outcomes. Sociology of Education, 77, 32–59.Google Scholar
- Guri-Rosenblit, S. (1999). Changing boundaries in Israeli higher education. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 91–114.Google Scholar
- Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K. C. (1987). Studying student college choices: A three-phase model of the implications for policymakers. College and University, (Spring), 62, 207–221.Google Scholar
- Hutchings, M. (2003). Information, advice and cultural discourses of higher education. In L. Archer, M. Hutchings, & A. Ross (Eds.), Higher education and social class (pp. 97–118). London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (ICBS). (2000). Statistical abstract for Israel 2000. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
- Lopez Turley, R. N. (2005). When parents want children to stay home for college. Paper presented at the meeting of the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility, Oslo.Google Scholar
- McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Yogev, A. (1997). Autonomy and choice as school strategies for peripheral communities in Israel. In R. Shapira, & P. W. Cookso (Eds.), Autonomy and choice in context: An international perspective (pp. 172–202). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar