Higher Education

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 723–740 | Cite as

“I Heard it through the Grapevine”: Doctoral Student Socialization in Chemistry and History

Original Paper

Abstract

Twenty doctoral students in the disciplines of chemistry and history were interviewed to better understand the socialization processes that influence their success and how these processes differ by year in the degree program and disciplinary culture. Five major themes emerged describing these socialization processes and how they facilitate or impede degree success, including Ambiguity, describing the programmatic guidelines and expectations that surrounded much of the students’ experience; Balance, pointing to the students’ need to balance graduate school responsibilities along with external relationships and demands; Independence, describing the students’ desire to find equilibrium as they transitioned to the role of independent scholar; Development, highlighting the significant cognitive, personal, and professional development that occurs in these students’ graduate experience; and Support, describing the faculty, peer, and financial support needed for the students’ success in their degree programs. Suggestions for policy, practice, and further research are discussed.

Keywords

Doctoral education Graduate education Qualitative Socialization Socialization processes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abedi, J., & Benkin, E. (1987). The effects of students’ academic, financial, and demographic variables on time to the doctorate. Research in Higher Education, 27(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appel, M. L., & Dahlgren, L. G. (2003). Swedish doctoral students’ experiences on their journey towards a Ph.D: Obstacles and opportunities inside and outside the academic building. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird, L. L. (1990). The melancholy of anatomy: The personal and professional development of graduate and professional school students. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of␣theory and research (Vol. 6, pp. 361–392). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baird, L. L. (1993). Using research and theoretical models of graduate student progress. In L.␣L.␣Baird (Ed.), Increasing graduate student retention and degree attainment (pp. 3–12). San␣Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Bargar, R. R., & Mayo-Chamberlain, J. (1983). Advisor and advisee issues in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 54(4), 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baxter-Magolda, M. B. (1998). Developing self-authorship in graduate school. In M. S. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (pp. 41–54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Biaggio, M. (2002). Student perceptions of factors helping and hindering dissertation process. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  10. Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bragg, A. K. (1976). The socialization process in higher education. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  14. Breslow, R. (2003). The doctorate in chemistry. Carnegie essays on the doctorate. Retrieved January 30, 2004, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/CID/essays.htmGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Conrad, C. F., Duren, K. M., & Haworth, J. G. (1998). Students’ perspectives on their master’s degree experiences: Disturbing the conventional wisdom. In M. S. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (pp. 65–76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Council of Graduate Schools (1990). The doctor of philosophy degree: A policy statement. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (1998). Survival skills for graduate school and beyond. In M.␣S.␣Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (pp. 29–40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Golde, C. M. (1996). How departmental contextual factors shape doctoral student attrition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  21. Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: Explaining first-year doctoral attrition. In M.␣S.␣Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (pp. 55–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Golde, C. M. (2004). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  23. Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Ensher, E. A. (2000). Effects of peer mentoring on types of mentor support, program satisfaction and graduate student stress: A dyadic perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 41(6), 637–642.Google Scholar
  25. Green, K. E., & Kluever, R. C. (1997). The dissertation barriers scale. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  26. Hartnett, R. T., & Katz, J. (1977). The education of graduate students. The Journal of Higher Education, 48(6), 646–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heiss, A. M. (1970). Challenges to graduate schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Huguley, S. (1988). An investigation of obstacles to completion of the dissertation and of doctoral student attitudes toward the dissertation experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University.Google Scholar
  29. Kirk, D., & Todd-Mancillas, W. R. (1991). Turning points in graduate student socialization: Implications for recruiting future faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 14(3), 407–422.Google Scholar
  30. Kuh, G. D., & Thomas, M. L. (1983). The use of adult development theory with graduate students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 24(1), 12–19.Google Scholar
  31. Kuh, G. D., & Whitt, E. J. (1988). The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  32. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  33. McCormick, A. C. (2001). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  34. Mortimer, J. T., & Simmons, R. (1978). Adult socialization. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 421–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nerad, M. (1994, June). Preparing for the next generation of professionals and scholars: Recent trends in graduate education in Germany and Japan. Paper presented at the invitational seminar of the National Research Council, Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel.Google Scholar
  36. Nerad, M., & Miller, D. S. (1996). Increasing student retention in graduate, professional programs. In J. G. Haworth (Ed.), Assessing graduate and professional education: Current realities, future prospects (pp. 61–76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Noble, K. A. (1994). Changing doctoral degrees: An international perspective. Suffolk, Great Britain: Edmundsbury Press.Google Scholar
  38. Smallwood, S. (2004, January 16). Doctor dropout. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 19A.Google Scholar
  39. Swales, J. M. (2004). The Ph.D. defense. In Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Turner, C. S. V., & Thompson, J. R. (1993). Socializing women doctoral students: Minority and majority experiences. The Review of Higher Education, 16(3), 355–370.Google Scholar
  42. Turner, J. L., Miller, M., & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (2002). Disciplinary cultures and graduate education. Emergences, 12(1), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. U.S. News and World Report. (2005). America’s Best Colleges 2005. Retrieved November 21, 2004, from http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/brief/natudoc/tier1/t1natudoc_brief.phpGoogle Scholar
  44. Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  45. Ylijoki, O.-H. (2000). Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying—A case-study of four Finnish university departments. Higher Education, 39, 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher EducationLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations