Higher Education

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 483–516 | Cite as

Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: Cognitive skills

  • David Billing
Article

Abstract

This article is a result of a completed survey of the mainly cognitive science literature on the transferability of those skills which have been described variously as ‘core’, ‘key’, and ‘generic’. The literature reveals that those predominantly cognitive skills which have been studied thoroughly (mainly problem solving) are transferable under certain conditions. These conditions relate particularly to the methods and environment of the learning of these skills. Therefore, there are many implications for the teaching of key skills in higher education, which the article draws out, following a summary of the main findings of the research literature. Learning of principles and concepts facilitates transfer to dissimilar problems, as it creates more flexible mental representations, whereas rote learning of facts discourages transfer. Transfer is fostered when general principles of reasoning are taught together with self-monitoring practices and potential applications in varied contexts. Training in reasoning and critical thinking is only effective for transfer, when abstract principles and rules are coupled with examples. Transfer is promoted when learning takes place in a social context, which fosters generation of principles and explanations. Transfer improves when learning is through co-operative methods, and where there is feedback on performance with training examples. The specificity of the context in which principles are learned reduces their transfer. Transfer is promoted if learners are shown how problems resemble each other, if they are expected to learn to do this themselves, if they are aware of how to apply skills in different contexts, if attention is directed to the underlying goal structure of comparable problems, if examples are varied and are accompanied by rules or principles (especially if discovered by the learners), and if learners’ self-explanations are stimulated. Learning to use meta-cognitive strategies is especially important for transfer.

Keywords

ability capability cognitive competency core generic key metacognitive skill teaching transfer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adey, P., Shayer, M. 1994Really Raising Standards: Cognitive Intervention and Academic AchievementRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, P.A., Murphy, P.K. 1999‘Nurturing the seeds of transfer: A domain-specific perspective’International Journal of Educational Research31561576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.R., Lebiere, C. 1998The Atomic Components of ThoughtErlbaumHillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J.R., Reder, L.M., Simon, H.A. 1996‘Situated learning and education’Educational Researcher25511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R.K., Derry, S.J., Renkl, A., Wortham, D. 2000‘Learning from examples: instructional principles from worked examples research’Review of Educational Research70181214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, R. (1994). The Limits of Competence: Knowledge, Higher Education and Society. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press, pp. 44–45, 64–66, 79–80, 92–93, 166–168Google Scholar
  7. Bassok, M., Holyoak, K.J 1993

    ‘Pragmatic knowledge and conceptual structure: Determinants of transfer between quantitative domains’

    Detterman, D.K.Sternberg, R.J. eds. Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and InstructionAblexNorwood, NJ6898
    Google Scholar
  8. Bennett N., Dunne E. and Carré C., (2000) Skills Development in Higher Education and Employment SRHE & Open University Press. BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  9. Bereiter, C. 1995

    ‘A dispositional view of transfer’

    McKeough, A.Lupart, J.Marini, A. eds. Teaching for Transfer: Fostering generalization in LearningLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ2134
    Google Scholar
  10. Billing, D. 2003‘Generic Cognitive Abilities in Higher Education: An international analysis of skills sought by stakeholders’Compare33335350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bransford, J.D.Brown, A.L.Cocking, R.R. eds. 1999How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and SchoolNational Academy PressWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., Reiser, J. 1986‘Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations’American Psychologist4110781089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bridges, D. 1993‘Transferable skills: A philosophical perspective’Studies in Higher Education184351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., Duguid, P. 1989‘Situated cognition and the culture of learning’Educational Researcher183242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campione, J.C., Shapiro, A.M., Brown, A.L. 1995

    ‘Forms of transfer in a community of learners: Flexible learning and understanding’

    McKeough, A.Lupart, J.Marini, A. eds. Teaching for Transfer: Fostering Generalization in LearningLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ3568
    Google Scholar
  16. Carraher, D., Schliemann, A.D. 2002‘The transfer dilemma’Journal of the Learning Sciences11124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Case, J., Gunstone, R. 2002‘Metacognitive development as a shift in approach to learning: An in-depth study’Studies in Higher Education27459470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Catrambone, R., Holyoak, K.J. 1989‘Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer’Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition1511471156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Covington, M.V. 1987

    Instruction in problem-solving planning

    Friedman, S.L.Scholnick, E.K.Cocking, R.R. eds. Blueprints for Thinking: The Role of Planning in Cognitive DevelopmentCambridge University PressNew York469511
    Google Scholar
  20. Cox, B.R. 1997‘The rediscovery of the active learner in adaptive contexts: A developmental-historical analysis of transfer’Educational Psychologist324155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DfES2003Foundation Degrees: Meeting the Need for Higher Level SkillsDepartment for Education and SkillsLondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Detterman, D.K. 1993

    ‘The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon’

    Detterman, D.K.Sternberg, R.J. eds. Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and InstructionAblexNorwood, NJ124
    Google Scholar
  23. Dufresne, R., Gerace, W.J., Hardiman, P.T., Mestre, J.P. 1992‘Constraining novices to perform expert-like problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition’Journal of the Learning Sciences2307331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gentner, D., Markham, A.B. 1997‘Structure mapping in analogy and similarity’American Psychologist524556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gick, M.L., Holyoak, K.J. 1987

    ‘The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer’

    Cormier, S.M.Hagman, J.D. eds. Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and Applications Academic Press IncSan Diego946
    Google Scholar
  26. Gray, W.D., Orasanu, J.M. 1987

    ‘Transfer of cognitive skills’

    Cormier, S.M.Hagman, J.D. eds. Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and ApplicationsAcademic Press IncSan Diego183215
    Google Scholar
  27. Greeno, J.G., Smith, D.R., Moore, J.L. and the Institute for Research on Learning (1993). ‘Transfer of situated learning’, in Detterman D.K. and Sternberg R.J. (eds.), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and Instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 99–167Google Scholar
  28. Halpern, D.F. 1996Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical ThinkingErlbaumMahaw, NJGoogle Scholar
  29. Hatano, G., Greeno, J.G. 1999‘Commentary: Alternative perspectives on transfer and transfer studies’International Journal of Educational Research31645654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herrnstein, R.J., Nickerson, R.S., Sanchez, M., Swets, J.A. 1986‘Teaching thinking skills’American Psychologist4112791289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kehr, H.M., Bles, P., Rosentiel, L. 1999‘Self-regulation, self-control and management training transfer’International Journal of Educational Research31487498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lim, E.L., Dixon, R.S., Moore, D.W. 1996‘Worked examples vs non-goal-specific problems: A test of schema development in geometry’Educational Psychology16421431Google Scholar
  33. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K. 2004‘First-year students’ perceptions of capability’Studies in Higher Education29109128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCrindle, A.R., Christensen, C.A. 1995‘The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance’Learning and Instruction5167185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McDaniel, M.A., Schlager, M.S. 1990‘Discovery learning and transfer of problem-solving skills’Cognition and Instruction7129159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McKeough, A.Lupart, J.Marini, A. eds. 1995Teaching for Transfer: Fostering Generalization in LearningLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ2134Google Scholar
  37. Marini, A., Genereux, R. 1995

    ‘The challenge of teaching for transfer’

    McKeough, A.Lupart, J.Marini, A. eds. Teaching for Transfer: Fostering Generalization in LearningLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ119
    Google Scholar
  38. Mayer, R.C., Wittrock, M.C. 1996

    ‘Problem-solving transfer’

    Berliner, D.C.Calfee, R.C. eds. Handbook of Educational PsychologyMacmillanNew York4762
    Google Scholar
  39. Mevarech, Z.R. 1999‘Effects of metacognitive training embedded in cooperative settings on mathematical problem solving’Journal of Educational Research92195205Google Scholar
  40. Minnaert, A., Janssen, P.J. 1999‘The additive effect of regulatory activities on top of intelligence in relation to academic performance in higher education’Learning and Instruction97791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newsome, G.L.,III 2000‘A review of some promising approaches to understanding and improving thinking skills’Journal of Research and Development in Education33199222Google Scholar
  42. Niedelman, M. 1991‘Problem solving and transfer’Journal of Learning Disabilities24322329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perez, R.S., Seidel, R.J. 1986

    ‘Cognitive theory of technical training’

    Sticht, T.G.Chang, F.R.Woods, S. eds. Advances in Reading/Language Research: Cognitive Science and Human Resources ManagementJAI PressGreenwich, CT
    Google Scholar
  44. Perkins, D.N., Salomon, G. 1987

    ‘Transfer and teaching thinking’

    Perkins, D.N.Lochhead, J.Bishop, J. eds. Thinking: The Second International ConferenceErlbaumHillsdale, NJ
    Google Scholar
  45. Perkins, D.N., Salomon, G. 1989‘Are cognitive skills context-bound?’Educational Researcher181625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Perkins, D.N., Salomon, G. 1994

    ‘Transfer of learning’

    Husen, T.Postlethwaite, T. eds. The International Encyclopaedia of Education2Elsevier/PergamonOxford64526457
    Google Scholar
  47. Phye, D. 1991‘Advice and feedback during cognitive training: Effects at acquisition and delayed transfer’Contemporary Educational Psychology168794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pintrich, P.R. 1999‘The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning’International Journal of Educational Research31459470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prabhakaran, V., Smith, J.A.L., Desmond, J.E, Glover, G.H., Gabrieli, J.D.E. 1997‘Neural substrates of fluid reasoning: An fMRI study of neocortical activation during performance of raven’s progressive matrices test’Cognitive Psychology334363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reed, S.K. 1987‘A structure-mapping model for word problems’Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition13124139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reed, S.K. 1993

    ‘A schema-based theory of transfer vol 2’

    Detterman, D.K.Sternberg, R.J. eds. Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and Instruction AblexNorwood, NJ3967
    Google Scholar
  52. Resnick, L.B. 1987Education and Learning to ThinkNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  53. Resnick, L., Collins, A. 1994

    ‘Cognition and learning’

    Husen, T.Postlethwaite, T. eds. The International Encyclopaedia of Education2Elsevier/PergamonOxford835838
    Google Scholar
  54. Rumelhart, D.E., Ortony, A. 1977

    ‘The representation of knowledge in memory’

    Anderson, R.C.Spiro, R.J.Montague, E. eds. Schooling and The Acquisition of KnowledgeErlbaumHillsdale, NJ
    Google Scholar
  55. Salvucci, D.D., Anderson, J.R. 2001‘Integrating analogical mapping and general problem solving: The path-mapping theory’Cognitive Science2567110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schoenfeld, A.H., Herrmann, D.J. 1982‘Problem perception and knowledge in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers’Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.8484494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schraw, G., Nietfeld, J. 1998‘A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis’Journal of Educational Psychology90236248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Simon, D.P., Simon, H.A. 1978

    ‘Individual differences in solving physics problems’

    Siegler, R.S. eds. Children’s Thinking: What Develops?Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ
    Google Scholar
  59. Simons, P.R.J. 1994

    ‘Metacognitive strategies, teaching and testing for’

    Husen, T.Postlethwaite, T. eds. The International Encyclopaedia of Education2Elsevier/PergamonOxford37883792
    Google Scholar
  60. Singley, M.K.Anderson, J.R. eds. 1989The Transfer of Cognitive SkillHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  61. Skin, N., Jonassen, D.H., McGee, S. 2003‘Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving in an astronomical situation’Journal of Research in Science Teaching40633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sternberg, R.J., Frensch, P.A. 1993

    ‘Mechanisms of transfer’

    Detterman, D.K.Sternberg, R.J. eds. Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and InstructionAblexNorwood, NJ2538
    Google Scholar
  63. Stokes, T.F., Baer, D.M. 1977‘An implicit technology of generalization’Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis10349367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sweller, J. 1988‘Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning’Cognitive Science12257285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Terenzini, P.T., Springer, L., Pascarella, E.T., Nora, A. 1995‘Influences affecting the development of students’ critical thinking skills’Research in Higher Education362339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tuovinen, J.E., Sweller, J. 1999‘A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples’Journal of Educational Psychology91334341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Merriënboer, J.J.G., Schuurman, J.G., Croock, M.B.M., Paas, F.G.W.C. 2002‘Redirecting learners’ attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency’Learning and Instruction121137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Veenan, M.C.J., Elshout, J.J., Meijer, J. 1997‘The generality vs domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains’Learning & Instruction7187209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Volcke, M. 2002‘Cognitive load: Updating the theory?’Learning and Instruction12147154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Volet, S.E. 1991‘Modelling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students’ learning’Learning and Instruction1319336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B.D., Holyoak, K.J. 1996‘The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure’Cognitive Science2075100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wade, S.E. and Reynolds, R.E. (1989) ‘Developing metacognitive awareness’. Journal of Reading, October 1989, 33(1), 6–14.Google Scholar
  73. White, B.Y., Frederickson, J.R. 1998‘Inquiry, modeling and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students’Cognition and Instruction163117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Billing
    • 1
  1. 1.HertsUK

Personalised recommendations