Higher Education

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 209–234

Orientations to research higher degree supervision

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9

Cite this article as:
Murphy, N., Bain, J.D. & Conrad, L. High Educ (2007) 53: 209. doi:10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9
  • 679 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the beliefs of supervisors and PhD candidates about higher degree supervision and three other academic domains: research; teaching; and learning. Interview data from 34 participants were categorised into four distinctive orientations to supervision, each consisting of a network (plexus) of beliefs about the four domains. Although each orientation comprised many beliefs, the orientations clearly differed in terms of two broad distinctions: whether the supervisor should direct and take responsibility for the research (controlling beliefs) or should guide the process (guiding beliefs), and whether the focus of supervision should be more upon the research tasks to be completed (task-focussed beliefs) or upon the development of the candidates (person-focussed beliefs). These distinctions, plus the types of interconnections between the beliefs comprising each orientation, support the conclusion that beliefs about teaching are central to each orientation, even though supervision is intimately concerned with research.

Keywords

beliefs controlling guiding orientations person-focussed research higher degree (RHD) supervision task-focussed 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Humanities & Social Science, c/639798, EEE, Block S2Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
  2. 2.School of Curriculum, Teaching & LearningGriffith UniversityAustralia
  3. 3.Griffith Institute for Higher EducationGriffith UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations