Higher Education

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 209–234 | Cite as

Orientations to research higher degree supervision

  • Noela MurphyEmail author
  • John D. Bain
  • Linda Conrad


This study examines the beliefs of supervisors and PhD candidates about higher degree supervision and three other academic domains: research; teaching; and learning. Interview data from 34 participants were categorised into four distinctive orientations to supervision, each consisting of a network (plexus) of beliefs about the four domains. Although each orientation comprised many beliefs, the orientations clearly differed in terms of two broad distinctions: whether the supervisor should direct and take responsibility for the research (controlling beliefs) or should guide the process (guiding beliefs), and whether the focus of supervision should be more upon the research tasks to be completed (task-focussed beliefs) or upon the development of the candidates (person-focussed beliefs). These distinctions, plus the types of interconnections between the beliefs comprising each orientation, support the conclusion that beliefs about teaching are central to each orientation, even though supervision is intimately concerned with research.


beliefs controlling guiding orientations person-focussed research higher degree (RHD) supervision task-focussed 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ainley, J. (2001). The 1999 Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire. Australian Council for Educational Research, Evaluations and Investigations Programme, Higher Education Division, DETYA: Commonwealth of Australia. Accessed May 2002.
  2. Andresen, L. 1999‘Supervision revisited: Thoughts on scholarship, pedagogy and postgraduate research’Wisker, G.Sutcliffe, N. eds. Good Practice in Postgraduate Supervision. SEDA Paper 106Staff and Educational DevelopmentBirmingham2538Google Scholar
  3. Aspland, T., Edwards, H., O’Leary, J. 1999‘Tracking new directions in the evaluation of postgraduate supervision’Innovative Higher Education24127147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bain, J., McNaught, C., Mills, C., Lueckenhausen, G. 1998‘Describing computer facilitated learning environments in higher education’Learning Environments Research1163180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bair, C.R., Haworth, J.G. 2004‘Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research’Smart, J. C. eds. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and ResearchKluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Becher, T., Trowler, P. 2001Academic Tribes and Territories2The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University PressBuckingham, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  7. Becher, T., Henkel, M., Kogan, M. 1994Graduate Education in Britain, Higher Education Policy Series 17Jessica KingsleyLondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond, C. (2000). The Development of Students’ Experiences of Learning in Higher Education. Doctoral thesis, Griffith University, QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  9. Brew, A. 1999‘Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context’Studies in Higher Education24291301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brockbank, A., McGill, I. 1998Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher EducationSRHE and OUPGuildford, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, G., Atkins, M. 1988Effective Teaching in Higher EducationMethuenLondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Burns R., Lamm, R. and Lewis, R. (1999). ‘Orientations to higher degree supervision: A study of supervisors and students in education’, in Holbrook, A. and Johnston, S. (eds.), Supervision of Postgraduate Research in Education. Australian Association for Research in Education, No. 5. Victoria, Australia: AARE, pp. 55–74Google Scholar
  13. Calderhead, J. 1996‘Teachers: beliefs and knowledge’Berliner, D.C. eds. Handbook of Educational PsychologyMacmillanNew York709725Google Scholar
  14. Connell, R.W. 1985‘How to supervise a PhD’Vestes23841Google Scholar
  15. Conrad, L. 1996‘A framework for evaluation of postgraduate supervision and support’Zuber-Skerritt, O. eds. Frameworks for Postgraduate EducationSouthern Cross University PressLismore, NSW4872Google Scholar
  16. Conrad, L. and Chipperfield, J. (2004). ‘Research Higher Degree Students’ Perceptions of their Learning’, paper presented at the Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference, Adelaide, 21–23 AprilGoogle Scholar
  17. Cullen, D.J., Pearson, M., Saha, L.J. and Spear, R.H. (1994). Establishing Effective PhD Supervision. Commonwealth of Australia: Higher Education Division, Evaluations and Investigations Program, ANUGoogle Scholar
  18. Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., Parry, P. 1997‘Critical mass and doctoral research: Reflections on the Harris Report’Studies in Higher Education22319331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Exley, K., O’Malley, C. 1999‘Supervising PhDs in science and engineering’Wisker, G.Sutcliffe, N. eds. Good Practice in Postgraduate Supervision. SEDA Paper 106Staff and Educational DevelopmentBirmingham3956Google Scholar
  20. Fox, D. 1983‘Personal theories of teaching’Studies in Higher Education8151163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gow, L., Kember, D. 1993‘Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to learning’British Journal of Educational Psychology632033Google Scholar
  22. Green, B. and Lee, A. (1995/1998). ‘Theorising postgraduate pedagogy’, in Lee, A. and Green, B. (eds.), Postgraduate Studies, Postgraduate Pedagogy. Centre for Language and Literacy, Faculty of Education, UTS and University Graduate School, University of Technology, Sydney, pp. 129–146Google Scholar
  23. Green, B., Lee, A. 1999‘Educational research, disciplinarity and postgraduate pedagogy: On the subject of supervision’Holbrook, A.Johnston, S. eds. Supervision of Postgraduate Research in EducationAAREVictoria, Australia207223No. 5Google Scholar
  24. Hativa, N. 2002‘Becoming a better teacher: A case of changing the pedagogical knowledge of law professors’Hativa, N.Goodyear, P. eds. Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher EducationKluwer AcademicDordrecht, Netherlands289319Google Scholar
  25. Hockey, J. 1996‘A contractual solution to problems in the supervision of PhD degrees in the UK’Studies in Higher Education21359371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holdaway, E. 1997a‘Quality issues in postgraduate education’Burgess, R. eds. Beyond the First Degree: Graduate Education, Lifelong Learning and CareersSociety for Research into Higher Education and OPUBuckingham6177Google Scholar
  27. Holdaway, E. (1997b). How Does the Australian PhD Stack up Against the North American PhD? Address given at Graduate School Forum, Australian National University, Canberra, 14 MayGoogle Scholar
  28. Holdaway, E.A., Deblois, C., Winchester, I.S. 1994‘Practices and opinions reported by coordinators of graduate programs’Interchange256586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horschette, J. 1994Career Advancement and Survival for EngineersJohn Wiley and Sons, Wiley-InterscienceNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Irby, D. 1994‘What clinical teachers in medicine need to know’Academic Medicine69333342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, L., Lee, A., Green, B. 2000‘The PhD and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy’Studies in Higher Education25136147Google Scholar
  32. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., Heath, C. 2002‘Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics’Review of Educational Research72177228Google Scholar
  33. Kember, D. 2001‘Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education’Studies in Higher Education26205221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kember, D., Gow, L. 1994‘Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning’Journal of Higher Education655874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemp, D.A. (2002). Higher Education Report for the 2002–2004 Triennium. DEST. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training. Accessed September 2003.
  36. Knowles, M. 1990The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species4HoustonGulfGoogle Scholar
  37. Kvale, S. 1996Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research InterviewingSageThousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  38. Latona, K. and Browne, M. (2001). ‘Factors associated with successful completion of research higher degrees’, Higher Education Series Report No. 37, May. Canberra: DETYA Higher Education Division, Communications UnitGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, A. and Green, B. (eds.). (1998). ‘Introduction’, in Lee, A. and Green, B. (eds.), Postgraduate Studies, Postgraduate Pedagogy. Centre for Language and Literacy, Faculty of Education, UTS and University Graduate School, University of Technology, Sydney, pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  40. Love, A. and Street, A. (1998). ‘Supervision as collaborative problem-solving: An integrative approach to postgraduate research education’, in Kiley, M. and Mullins, G. (eds.), Quality in Postgraduate Research: Managing the New Agenda. Proceedings of the 1998 Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference. Adelaide, pp. 149–159Google Scholar
  41. Macauley, P. (2001). Doctoral Research and Scholarly Communication: Candidates, Supervisors and Information Literacy. Doctoral thesis, Faculty of Education, Deakin University, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  42. McWilliam, E. (ed.). (2002). Doctoral education in a knowledge economy [Special issue]. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(2)Google Scholar
  43. Martin, Y.M., Maclachlan, M. and Karmel, T. (2001). Postgraduate Completion Rates. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), 2001D, Occasional Paper Series, Higher Education Division, Commonwealth of Australia. Accessed April, 2002.
  44. Neumann, R. 1992‘Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis’Higher Education23159171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neumann, R. (2003). The Doctoral Education Experience: Diversity and Complexity. DEST, Evaluations and Investigations Programme. Accessed September 2003.
  46. Nespor, J. 1987‘The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching’Journal of Curriculum Studies19317328Google Scholar
  47. Pajares, M.F. 1992‘Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy constructReview of Educational Research62307332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parry, S., Hayden, M. 1994Supervising Higher Degree Research StudentsDEETCanberraGoogle Scholar
  49. Pearse, H. (2002). Implementing the Research Training Scheme: The consequences for postgraduate research students. CAPA Research Paper, November 2003: Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations. Accessed October 2003.
  50. Pearson, M. 1996‘Professionalising PhD education to enhance the quality of the student experience’Higher Education32303320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pearson, M. 1999‘The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: Implications for quality management, improvement and innovation’Higher Education Research and Development18269286Google Scholar
  52. Pearson, M., Brew, A. 2002‘Research training and supervision development’Studies in Higher Education27135150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Phillips, E., Pugh, D.H. 1994How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors2OUPBuckingham, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  54. Pole, C., Sprokkereef, A., Burgess, R., Lakin, E. 1997‘Supervision of doctoral students in the natural sciences: Expectations and experiences’Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education224963Google Scholar
  55. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K. 1999Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher EducationSHRE and OUPBuckingham, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  56. Quinlan, K. (1997). ‘Case studies of academics’ educational beliefs about their discipline: Toward a discourse on scholarly dimensions of teaching’, Proceedings, HERSDA International Conference, Adelaide, pp. 620–625Google Scholar
  57. Quinlan, K. 1999‘Commonalities and controversy in context: A study of academic historians’ educational beliefs’Teaching and Teacher Education15447463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Quinlan, K. 2002‘Scholarly dimensions of academics’ beliefs about engineering education’Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice84164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ramsden, P., Ginns, P. and Conrad, L. (2004). ‘Associations between research students’ experiences and learning outcomes’. 12th Improving Student Learning Symposium, Birmingham, UK, 6–8 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  60. Samuelowicz, K. (1999). Academics’ Educational Beliefs and Teaching Practices. Doctoral dissertation. Griffith University, QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  61. Samuelowicz, K., Bain, J.D. 1992‘Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers’Higher Education2492111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Samuelowicz, K., Bain, J.D. 2001‘Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning’Higher Education41299325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Samuelowicz, K., Bain, J.D. 2002‘Identifying academics’ orientations to assessment practice’Higher Education43173201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shannon, A.G. 1998‘Research degree supervision: “More mentor than master”’Lee, A.Green, B. eds. Postgraduate Studies, Postgraduate PedagogyUTS, Faculty of Education, Centre for Language and Literacy and University Graduate SchoolSydney3141Google Scholar
  65. Smeby, J. 2000‘Disciplinary differences in Norwegian graduate education’Studies in Higher Education255367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, B. 2001‘(Re)framing research degree supervision as pedagogy’Bartlett, A.Mercer, G. eds. Postgraduate Research Supervision: Transforming (R)elationsPeter LangNew York2541Google Scholar
  67. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. 1998Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory2SageThousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  68. Driel, J., Verloop, N., Werven, H., Dekkers, H. 1997‘Teachers’ craft knowledge and curriculum innovation in higher engineering education’Higher Education34105122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Whittle, J. 1992‘Research culture, supervision practices’Zuber-Skerritt, O. eds. Starting Research – Supervision and TrainingTertiary Education Institute, University of QueenslandBrisbane86107Google Scholar
  70. Wisker, G. 1999‘Introduction: Changes in postgraduates, changes in good practice in supervision and instructional support’Wisker, G.Sutcliffe, N. eds. Good Practice in Postgraduate Supervision SEDA Paper 106Staff and Educational DevelopmentBirmingham56Google Scholar
  71. Wisker, G. (2000). ‘Postgraduate learning styles and enabling practices: A multicultural action research study’, in Kiley, M. and Mullins, G. (eds.). Making Ends Meet. Proceedings of the 2nd Postgraduate Experience Conference, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  72. Zuber-Skerritt, O. eds. 1992Starting Research – Supervision and TrainingTertiary Education Institute, University of QueenslandBrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  73. Zuber-Skerritt, O.Ryan, Y. eds. 1994Quality in Postgraduate EducationKogan PageLondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Humanities & Social Science, c/639798, EEE, Block S2Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
  2. 2.School of Curriculum, Teaching & LearningGriffith UniversityAustralia
  3. 3.Griffith Institute for Higher EducationGriffith UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations