Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 107–146 | Cite as

Wider access and progression among full-time students

  • Muir Houston
  • Hazel Knox
  • Russell RimmerEmail author
Article

Abstract

By 2010 the UK government intends to widen access and provide experience of higher education to half of those aged up to 30. Unlike many institutions, University of Paisley (UP) has exceeded its individual target on access. It has done this by providing entry routes for students with ‘non-traditional’ qualifications. It is feared that low entry qualifications will adversely influence performance and progression statistics as wider access is pursued. Drawing on a student-attrition theory, performance and progression are investigated using data for students enrolling at UP for the first time in 2000. At UP non-traditional entry coincided with the enrolment of many students over 21. The relationships between age and performance and between age and progression are nonlinear and involve interactions with gender. Also, there are interactions between entry qualification and field of study. These relationships and interactions could complicate the important task of translating wider access into academic success.

Keywords

academic performance age entry qualification fields of study gender progression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bean, J., Metzner, B. 1985‘A conceptual model of non-traditional undergraduate student attrition’Review of Educational Research55485540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beekhoven, S., Jong, U., Hout, H. 2002‘Explaining academic progress via combining concepts of integration theory and rational choice theory’Research in Higher Education43577600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, K. 1998The Developing Person through the Life SpanWorthNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourner, T., (with Hamed, M.) (1987). Entry Qualifications and Degree Performance. London: Council for National Academic AwardsGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabrera, A., Casteneda, M., Nora, A., Hengstler, D. 1992‘The convergence between two theories of college persistence’Journal of Higher Education63143164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabrera, A., Nora, F., Castenada, M. 1993‘College persistence: structural equations modelling test of an integrated model of student retention’Journal of Higher Education64123149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collis, C., Green, A., Mallier, T. 2000‘Older female workers in Britain and its regions’Local Economy154558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curran, J. and Volpe, G. (2004). Degrees of Freedom: An Analysis of Degree Classification Regulations. London: London Metropolitan University. Available at London Metropolitan University. (2005). London Metropolitan University. (Updated 25 July) http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/library/x75868_3.pdf (Accessed 20 June 2005)Google Scholar
  9. Duggan, M. (2003). The effects of social capital on the first year persistence of first generation college students. Tampa: Presented at the 43rd Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research.Google Scholar
  10. Foster, J., Houston, M., Knox, H., Rimmer, R. 2002Surviving First Year. Occasional Papers Series No. 1University of PaisleyPaisleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Gujarati, D. 2003Basic EconometricsMcGraw HillBostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Hatt, S., Baxter, A. 2003‘A comparison of students entering higher education with academic and vocational qualifications’Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning51829Google Scholar
  13. Hosmer, D., Lemeshow, S. 2000Applied Logistic RegressionWileyNew YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houston, M., Rimmer, R. 2005‘A comparison of academic outcomes for business and other students’International Journal of Management Education41119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jansen, E. 2004‘The influence of the curriculum organization on study progress in higher education’Higher Education47411435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnston, V., McLeod, L. and Small, G. (2003). ‘Using a research-led approach to informing retention strategies for students from low income and lower socio-economic groups’. Amsterdam: Presented at the 12th European Access Network Conference.Google Scholar
  17. Johnston, V. 1999An analysis of factors influencing undergraduate progression in the first year in a Scottish universityStudent Retention Project, Napier UniversityEdinburghGoogle Scholar
  18. Leppel, K. 2001‘The impact of major on college persistence among freshmen’Higher Education41327342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leslie, D. 2003‘Using success to measure quality in British higher education: which subjects attract the best-qualified students?’Journal of the Royal Statistical Society166329347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levine, D., Berenson, M., Stephen, D. 1999Statistics for managers using Microsoft ExcelPrentice HallUpper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  21. McNabb, R., Pal, S., Sloane, P. 2002‘Gender differences in educational attainment: the case of university students in England and Wales’69481503Google Scholar
  22. Metzner, B., Bean, J. 1987‘The estimation of a conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition’Research in Higher Education271538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mincer, J. 1958‘Investment in human capital and personal income distribution’Journal of Political Economy70S50S70 Part 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. National Audit Office2002Improving student achievement in English higher educationNational Audit OfficeLondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Patrick, W. 2001‘Estimating first-year attrition rates: an application of multilevel modeling using categorical variables’Research in Higher Education42151170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pike, G., Saupe, J. 2002‘Does high school matter? An analysis of three methods of predicting first-year grades’Research in Higher Education43187207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quiggen, J. 1999‘Human capital theory and education policy in Australia’Australian Economic Review32130144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson, J., Woodley, A. 2003‘Another look at the role of age, gender and subject as predictors of academic attainment in higher education’Studies in Higher Education28475490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rimmer, R., Rimmer, S. 1997‘Employment breaks, pay and career development among Australian women’Gender, Work and Organisation4202217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruddock, M., Hanson, G. and Moss, M. (1999). ‘New directions in student retention research: looking beyond interactional theories of student departure’. Presented at the 39th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  31. SAAS (Student Awards Agency for Scotland). (2004). Students Awards Agency for Scotland. (Updated 21 May) http://www.student-support-saas.gov.uk (Accessed 14 July 2005)Google Scholar
  32. Schuller, T., Bamford, C. 2000‘A social capital approach to the analysis of continuing education: evidence from the UK learning society research project’Oxford Review of Education26619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SCQF (Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework)2003An Introduction to the Scottish Credit and Qualifications FrameworkSCQFGlasgowGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, J., Naylor, R. 2001a‘Dropping out of university: a statistical analysis of the probability of withdrawal for UK university students’Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A164389405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, J., Naylor, R. 2001b‘Determinants of degree performance in UK universities: a statistical analysis of the 1993 student cohort’Oxford Bulletin of Statistics632960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smithers, R. (2004). ‘Degree grading system faces axe’. The Guardian. 04 November. Also at The Guardian (2004). ‘Degree grading system faces axe’. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1342869,00.html. (Accessed 20 June 2005)Google Scholar
  37. Szafran, R. 2001‘The effect of academic load on success for New College students: is lighter better?’Research in Higher Education422750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. THES2003Times Higher Education SupplementThe TimesLondon5 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson, G. and du Toit, A. (2002). ‘Has the part-time/full-time divide narrowed? A preliminary investigation into the varying motivations between part-time and full-time students’. Presented at the Business Learning and Teaching Support Network 2002, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  40. Tinto, V. 1975‘Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research’Review of Educational Research4589125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tinto, V. 1988‘Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving’Journal of Higher Education59438455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tinto, V. 1993Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student AttritionUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  43. Tinto, V. 1997‘Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence’Journal of Higher Education68599623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. UCAS (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) (2004). ucas.com: Statistics. http://www.ucas.ac.uk/figures/ads.html#instage (Accessed 19 March 2004)Google Scholar
  45. Warr, P. 1994Age and job performanceSnel, JCremer, R. eds. Work and AgingTaylor & FrancisLondon309322Google Scholar
  46. Woodley, A. 1984‘The older the better? A study of mature student performance in British universities’Research in Education323550Google Scholar
  47. Woodley, A., Thompson, M., Cowan, J. 1992Factors Affecting Non-completion Rates in Scottish UniversitiesInstitute of Educational Technology, The Open UniversityMilton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  48. Yorke, M. 2002‘Degree classification in English, Welsh and Northern Irish universities: Trends 1994–1995 to 1998–1999’Higher Education Quarterly5692108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yorke, M. 1999Leaving Early: Undergraduate Non-completion in Higher EducationFalmer PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Yorke, M. 1997‘Module mark distributions in eight fields of study and some issues they raise’Jackson, M. eds. Modular Education in Higher EducationHigher Education Quality CommissionLondon105107Google Scholar
  51. Yorke, M., Cooper, A., Fox, W., Haines, C., McHugh, P., Turner, D., Woolf, H. 1995Patterns of Marks in Modular Schemes and Some ImplicationsLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of StirlingScotland, UK
  2. 2.Centre for Learning and TeachingUniversity of PaisleyScotland, UK
  3. 3.Paisley Business SchoolUniversity of PaisleyPaisleyScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations