Higher Education

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 255–289 | Cite as

The development of students’ ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses

Article

Abstract

Findings are presented from an ongoing study of three final-year, honours-level course units in the biosciences with a combined intake of 85 students. The data on which the analysis draws comprise semi-structured interviews with students together with findings from an Experiences of Teaching and Learning Questionnaire. The investigation forms part of a wider project concerned with the enhancement of teaching–learning environments in undergraduate courses in contrasting subject areas. The findings presented in the paper focus on two interrelated aspects of the students’ experiences within the teaching–learning environments represented by the three course settings. First, salient aspects of high-quality undergraduate-level learning are identified in the form of the students’ evolving grasp of characteristic ways of thinking and practising in the subject. These ways of thinking and practising in the biosciences were evident in the students’ engagement with the research literature and with experimental data, and in their efforts to master the requirements and conventions of the subject for written and oral discourse. The second part of the analyses focuses on the teaching–learning environments represented by the three course settings. It was found that, despite taking markedly different forms in the three settings, the teaching–learning and assessment strategies pursued appeared to be broadly congruent with the promotion of ways of thinking and practising in the subject. The quality of feedback to students also seemed pivotal, but needed to be understood in terms of the interplay of various factors, including opportunities for intrinsic as well as extrinsic feedback. Finally, the later years of undergraduate studies had called for a significant process of adjustment on the students’ part to a step-change in study demands.

Keywords

biology feedback higher education student learning ways of thinking and practising 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, C. 1997

    ‘Enabling and shaping understanding through tutorials’

    Marton, F.Hounsell, D.Entwistle, N. eds. The Experience of Learning2Scottish Academic PressEdinburgh184197
    Google Scholar
  2. Ballard, B., Clanchy, J. 1988

    ‘Literacy in the university: an ‘anthropological’ approach’

    Taylor, G.Ballard, B.Beasley, V.Bock, H.Clanchy, J.Nightingale, v eds. Literacy by DegreesSRHE and Open University PressMilton-Keynes
    Google Scholar
  3. Becher, T. 1994The significance of disciplinary differencesStudies in Higher Education19151161Google Scholar
  4. Becher, T., Trowler, P. 2001Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of DisciplinesSRHE and Open University PressBuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, H.S., Geer, B., Hughes, E.C. 1968Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College LifeWileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs, J.B. 1996Enhancing teaching through constructive alignmentHigher Education32347364Google Scholar
  7. Biggs, J.B. 2003Teaching for Quality Learning at University2SRHE & Open University PressBuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, P., Wiliam, D. 1998Assessment and classroom learningAssessment in Education5774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, P., Harrison, C., Marshall, , Lee, C., Wiliam, D. 2003Assessment for Learning. Putting it into PracticeOpen University PressMaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  10. Boekaerts, M.Pintrich, P.Zeidner, M. eds. 2000Handbook of Self-RegulationAcademic PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J., Smith, D., Brooker, R. 1998From conception to performance: How undergraduate students conceptualise and construct essaysHigher Education36449469Google Scholar
  12. Department for Education and Skills2003The Future of Higher Education. (Cm 5735)The Stationery OfficeLondon [see espec. paras 1.19 and 1.31]Google Scholar
  13. Ecclestone, K. 2002Learning Autonomy in Post-16 Education: The Politics and Practice of Formative AssessmentRoutledgeFalmerLondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Entwistle, N.J. 1992The Impact of Teaching on Learning Outcomes: Higher EducationDepartment of Employment/USDUSheffieldGoogle Scholar
  15. Entwistle, N.J. 2000

    ‘Approaches to studying and levels of understanding: The influences of teaching and assessment’

    Smart, J.C. eds. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. XVAgathon PressNew York
    Google Scholar
  16. Entwistle, N.J., McCune, V. 2004The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories in higher educationEducational Psychology Review16325346Google Scholar
  17. Entwistle, N., Ramsden, P. 1983Understanding Student LearningCroom HelmLondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Entwistle, N., McCune, V., Hounsell, J. 2003

    ‘Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching–learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching’

    De Corte, E.Verschaffel, I.Entwistle, N.J.van Merrienboer, J. eds. Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions of Powerful Learning EnvironmentsElsevier ScienceOxford89107
    Google Scholar
  19. Hounsell, D. 1987

    ‘Essay writing and the quality of feedback’

    Richardson, J.T.E.Eysenck, M.W.Warren Piper, D. eds. Student Learning: Research into Education and Cognitive PsychologySRHE and Open University PressMilton Keynes109119
    Google Scholar
  20. Hounsell, D. 1997

    ‘Contrasting conceptions of essay writing’

    Marton, F.Hounsell, D.Entwistle, N. eds. The Experience of Learning2Scottish Academic PressEdinburgh106125
    Google Scholar
  21. Hounsell, D. and McCune, V. (2002). Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Biology: Initial Perspectives and Findings. (ETL Occasional Reports, no. 2). Universities of Edinburgh, Durham and Coventry, ETL Project.Google Scholar
  22. Laurillard, D.M. 1997

    ‘Styles and approaches in problem-solving’

    Marton, F.Hounsell, D.Entwistle, N. eds. The Experience of Learning2Scottish Academic PressEdinburgh126144
    Google Scholar
  23. Laurillard, D. 2002Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies2RoutledgeFalmerLondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Lave, J., Wenger, E. 1999

    ‘Learning and pedagogy in communities of practice’

    Leach, J.Moon, B. eds. Learners and PedagogyPaul ChapmanLondon
    Google Scholar
  25. McCune, V. (2000). The Development of First Year University Students’ Approaches to Studying. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  26. McCune, V. (2003). ‘Promoting high-quality learning: Perspectives from the ETL project’, Paper presented at the 14th Conference on University and College Pedagogy of the Norwegian Network in Higher Education, Fredrikstad, 22–23 October 2003.Google Scholar
  27. McCune, V., Hounsell, D. and Nisbet, J. (2003). ‘Final-year biology courses as teaching–learning environments’, Paper presented at the 10th Biennial EARLI Conference, Padova, 26‐30 August 2003. [http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/publications.html]Google Scholar
  28. McDowell, L., Sambell, K. 1999

    ‘The experience of innovative assessment: Student perspectives’

    Brown, S.Glasner, A. eds. Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches SRHE and Open University PressBuckingham7182
    Google Scholar
  29. Marton, F.Hounsell, D.Entwistle, N. eds. 1997The Experience of Learning2Scottish Academic PressEdinburghGoogle Scholar
  30. Nardi, E. 2001The transition from school to university in Italy: Examination reform and outstanding issuesAssessment in Education: Principles Policy & Practice8339351Google Scholar
  31. Parlett, M. 1977The department as a learning milieuStudies in Higher Education2173181Google Scholar
  32. Perry, W.G. 1970Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College YearsHolt Rinehart & WinstonNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Perry, W.G. 1988

    ‘Different worlds in the same classroom’

    Ramsden, P. eds. Improving Learning: New PerspectivesKogan PageLondon145161
    Google Scholar
  34. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K. 1999Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher EducationSRHE and Open University PressBuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  35. Prosser, M., Webb, C. 1994Relating the process of undergraduate essay writing to the finished productStudies in Higher Education19125138Google Scholar
  36. Ramsden, P. 1997

    ‘The context of learning in academic departments’

    Marton, F.Hounsell, D.Entwistle, N. eds. The Experience of Learning2Scottish Academic PressEdinburgh198216
    Google Scholar
  37. Ramsden, P. 2003Learning to Teach in Higher Education2RoutledgeFalmerLondon221222Google Scholar
  38. Ramsden, P., Entwistle, N. 1981Effects of academic departments on students’ approaches to studyingBritish Journal of Educational Psychology51368383Google Scholar
  39. Richter, R. 1997The transition from secondary to higher education in GermanyQuality in Higher Education3143153Google Scholar
  40. Sadler, D.R. 1989Formative assessment and the design of instructional systemsInstructional Science18119144Google Scholar
  41. Sadler, D.R. 1998Formative assessment: Revisiting the territoryAssessment in Education57784Google Scholar
  42. Scouller, K. 1998The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essayHigher Education37435452Google Scholar
  43. Tang, C. 1994

    ‘Effects of modes of assessment on students’ preparation strategies’

    Gibbs, G. eds. Improving Student Learning: Theory and Practice OCSLDOxford151170
    Google Scholar
  44. Thomas, P.R., Bain, J.D. 1984Contextual dependence of learning approaches: The effects of assessmentsHuman Learning3227240Google Scholar
  45. Vermunt, J., Verloop, N. 1999Congruence and friction between learning and teachingLearning and Instruction9257280Google Scholar
  46. Wall, D., Macaulay, C., Tait, H., Entwistle, D., Entwistle, N. 1991The Transition from School to Higher Education in ScotlandUniversity of Edinburgh, Centre for Research on Learning and InstructionEdinburghReport to the Scottish Office Education DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson, K., Lizzio, A., Ramsden, P. 1997The development, validation and application of the Course Experience QuestionnaireStudies in Higher Education223353Google Scholar
  48. Wood, E. (2001). ‘Editorial’, LTSN Biosciences Bulletin 4, 1–2. http://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/publications/bulletin.htm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher and Community Education, Moray House School of EducationUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations