Higher Education

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 473–508 | Cite as

Networked Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Expectations and Experiences

  • Peter Goodyear
  • Chris Jones
  • Mireia Asensio
  • Vivien Hodgson
  • Christine Steeples


This paper reports findings from a study of undergraduates’ expectations about, and experiences of, networked learning using computer-mediated conferencing (CMC). The data come from questionnaires administered at the start and end of four different courses, and their interpretation is informed by a set of interviews with students and teachers involved in these and other networked learning courses. Students’ views were generally positive at the start and at the end of each course, though they became more moderate over time. The structure of students’ reported feelings remained relatively stable over time. There was no evidence to suggest that male or younger students had more positive feelings about networked learning. The thoroughness with which CMC is integrated into a networked learning course appears as a significant factor in explaining differences in students’ feelings about the worth and value of their experience. As might be expected, a well-integrated course was associated with more positive experiences.


approaches to study computer conferencing networked learning student expectations student experiences 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banks, S.Goodyear, P.Hodgson, V.McConnell, D. eds. 2002Networked Learning 2002: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Networked LearningSheffield UniversitySheffieldGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonk, C.King, K. eds. 1998Electronic Collaborators: Learner Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship and DiscourseLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth, S., Hulten, M 2003‘Opening dimensions of variation: An empirical study of learning in a web-based discussion’Instructional Science316586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coomey, M., Stephenson, J. 2001‘Online learning: It’s all about dialogue, involvement, support and control according to research’Stephenson, J. eds. Teaching and Learning Online: Pedagogies for New TechnologiesKogan PageLondon3752Google Scholar
  5. Laat, M., Lally, V. 2003‘Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community’Instructional Science31739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Entwistle, N., Tait, H., McCune,  2000‘Patterns of response to an approaches to study inventory across contrasting groups and contexts’European Journal of the Psychology of Education153348Google Scholar
  7. Goodyear, P. 1996‘Asynchronous peer interaction in distance education: The evolution of goals, practices and technology’Training Research Journal171102Google Scholar
  8. Goodyear, P., Jones, C, Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., Steeples, C. 2001Students’ Experiences of Networked Learning in Higher Education, Final Project Report (2 vols.)Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)BristolGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartley, J., Tagg, A., Garber, B., Barry, D., Fitter, M. 1991Computer Conferencing for Distance Learning: Final Report to the Learning Technologies Unit of the Department of EmploymentBirkbeck College, University of LondonLondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hara, N., Bonk, C.J., Angeli, C. 2000‘Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course’Instructional Science28115152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hazemi, R.Hailes, S.Wilbur, S. eds. 1998The Digital University: Reinventing the AcademySpringer VerlagNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Henri, F. 1992‘Computer conferencing and content analysis’Kaye, A. eds. Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden PapersSpringer-VerlagBerlin115136Google Scholar
  13. Hodgson, V., McConnell, D. 1992‘IT based open learning: A case study in Management learning’Journal of Computer Assisted Learning8136150Google Scholar
  14. Howell-Richardson, C., Mellar, H. 1996‘A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer-mediated communication courses’Instructional Science244769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, C. 1998Context, Content and Cooperation: An Ethnographic Study of Collaborative Learning onlineManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterDoctoral DissertationGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, C. (2000). Understanding Students’ Experiences of Collaborative Networked Learning. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, C., Bloxham, S. 2001‘Networked legal learning: An evaluation of the student experience’International Review of Law, Computers and Technology3317329Google Scholar
  18. Jones, C., Asensio, M. 2001‘Experiences of assessment: Using phenomenography for evaluation’Journal of Computer Assisted Learning17314321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, C., Asensio, M., Goodyear, P. 2000‘Networked learning in higher education: Practitioners’ perspectives’Journal of the Association for Learning Technology81828Google Scholar
  20. Jones, C. and Cawood, J. (1998). The Unreliable Transcript: Contingent Technology and Informal Practice in Asynchronous Learning Networks. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference, Sheffield University.Google Scholar
  21. Kaye, A. eds. 1992Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden PapersSpringer VerlagBerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Kramarae, C., Taylor, H. 1993‘Women and men on electronic networks: A conversation or a monologue?’Taylor, H.Kramarae, C.Ebben, M. eds. Women, Information Technology and Scholarship.University of Illinois Center for Advanced StudyIllinoisGoogle Scholar
  23. Light, P., Light, V. 1999‘Analysing asynchronous learning interactions: Computer-mediated communication in a conventional undergraduate setting’Littleton, K.Light, P. eds. Learning with Computers: Analysing Productive InteractionRoutledgeLondon162178Google Scholar
  24. Light, V., Nesbitt, E., Light, P., Burns, J. 2000‘Let’s You and Me Have a Little Discussion’: Computer mediated communication in support of campus-based university courses’Studies in Higher Education258596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mason, R.Kaye, A. eds. 1989Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance EducationPergamonOxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. McConnell, D. 2000Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning2Kogan PageLondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Mowrer, D. 1996‘A content analysis of student/instructor communication via computer conferencing’Higher Education3221741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson, J. 2000Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus-based and Distance EducationSRHE/Open University PressBuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  29. Steeples, C., Johnson, R., Goodyear, P. 1992‘The rationale and design of the MSc information technology and learning course’Holmes, G. eds. Integrating Learning Technology into the CurriculumComputers in Teaching InitiativeOxford1317Google Scholar
  30. Steeples, C.Jones, C. eds. 2002Networked Learning: Perspectives and IssuesSpringerLondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Swan, K. 2001‘Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online course’Distance Education22306331Google Scholar
  32. Tait, H., Entwistle, N. 1996‘Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies’Higher Education3197116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhu, E. 1998‘Learning and mentoring: Electronic discussion in a distance learning course’Bonk, C.King, K. eds. Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship and DiscourseErlbaumMahwah, New Jersey233259Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Goodyear
    • 1
  • Chris Jones
    • 2
  • Mireia Asensio
    • 2
  • Vivien Hodgson
    • 2
  • Christine Steeples
    • 2
  1. 1.CoCo, Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Studies in Advanced Learning TechnologyLancaster UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations