Understanding and Resolving Conflicting Traditions: A MacIntyrean Approach to Shared Deliberation in Medical Ethics
The position of clinical ethicist exists to help resolve conflicts in the hospital. Sometimes these conflicts arise because of fundamental cultural differences between the patient and the medical team, and such cases present special challenges. Should the ideology of modern medicine reject the wishes of those who hold ideologies from differing cultures? How can the medical ethicist help resolve such conflicts? To answer these questions, I rely on the works of Alasdair MacIntyre. Using MacIntyre’s philosophy, we can better understand why traditions exist, how conflicts arise, and how opposing traditions can collaborate in shared decision making. In order to overcome conflict, I conclude that MacIntyre’s virtues of acknowledged dependence must be realized by the ethicist and those in disagreement over tradition. I use a case study of a young Amish patient to highlight the conflicts that arise and to help exhibit how shared decision making can be made possible.
KeywordsShared deliberation MacIntyre Virtues of acknowledged dependence Epistemic crisis Decision making
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest and has no sources of funding to declare. This article has not been published elsewhere and is not under review by any other journals.
- American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2017). Healthcare Ethics Consultation (HCEC) Certification. http://asbh.org/professional-development/hcec-certification.
- American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. About. http://asbh.org/about/american-society-bioethicshumanities.
- Annas, J. (1989). MacIntyre on traditions. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 18(4), 388–404.Google Scholar
- Aristotle. (2000). Nichomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Ed., Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Knight, K. (1998). The MacIntyre reader. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
- Lutz, C. (2012). Reading Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue (3rd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
- MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
- MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals (10th ed.). Peru, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- MacIntyre, A. (2009). God, philosophy, universities: A selective history of the Catholic philosophical tradition. Plymouth, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
- Tarzian, A., & ASBH Core Competencies Update Task Force. (2013). Health care ethics consultation: An update on core competencies and emerging standards from the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities’ core competencies update task force. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(2), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar