Advertisement

HEC Forum

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 93–126 | Cite as

A Grassroots Community Dialogue on the Ethics of the Care of People with Autism and Their Families: The Stony Brook Guidelines

  • Stephen G. PostEmail author
  • John Pomeroy
  • Carla Keirns
  • Virginia Isaacs Cover
  • Michael Leverett Dorn
Article

Abstract

The increased recognition and reported prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) combined with the associated societal and clinical impact call for a broad grassroots community-based dialogue on treatment related ethical and social issues. In these Stony Brook Guidelines, which were developed during a full year of community dialogue (2010–2011) with affected individuals, families, and professionals in the field, we identify and discuss topics of paramount concern to the ASD constituency: treatment goals and happiness, distributive justice, managing the desperate hopes for a cure, sibling responsibilities, intimacy and sex, diagnostic ethics, and research ethics. The members of the dialogue core committee included doctors, ethicists, administrators, social workers, ministers, disability experts, and many family members of individuals with autism who were especially engaged in community activities on behalf of their constituency, including siblings, parents, and grandparents. Our guidelines are not based on “top-down” imposition of professional expertise, but rather on a “bottom-up” grass roots attention to the voices of affected individuals and families speaking from experience. These guidelines can inform clinical practice, but they also are meaningful for the wider social conversation emerging over the treatment of individuals with ASD.

Keywords

Autism Ethics Clinical practice Treatment Social issues 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Pamela Block, PhD; Louis and Florence Boroson (This paper is dedicated to the memory of Louis Boroson and Florence Boroson who both passed within six months of the completion of the dialogue series); Anne Coulehan, MSW ACSW CPE NACC, Chaplain, Stony Brook University Medical Center; Jack Coulehan, PhD MPH, Senior Fellow, Center for Medical Humanities, Compassionate Care, and Bioethics, Stony Brook University; Kim Covell, Editor with the Press News Group, and Co-Founder of AweinAutism.com; Kim Kubasek, Associate Executive Director, Developmental Disabilities Institute; Elizabeth Luchsinger, MS; Shana Nichols, PhD, Clinical Psychologist and Director of ASPIRE Center for Learning and Development; James Parles, MD, Smithtown Pediatrics; Linda Scheiber, PhD, Director of Clinical Services, Maryhaven Center for Hope; Samara Tetenbaum, PhD, Psychology Postdoctoral Fellow, Co-Director of ASPIRE Center for Learning and Development; Rose Ann Walsh, Autism Speaks.

References

  1. Alzheimer’s Association (US). Ethical issues in Alzheimer’s disease. Chicago: Alzheimer’s Association US, 2001, 2011 revised.Google Scholar
  2. Alzheimer Society of Canada. (1997).  Tough issues: Ethical guidelines of the Alzheimer Society of Canada. Toronto: Alzheimer Canada Imprint.Google Scholar
  3. Goddard, L., Howlin, P., Dritschel, B., & Patel, T. (2007). Autobiographical memory and social problem solving in Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lara, J. (2015). Autism movement therapy method: Waking up the brain! Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Moody, H. R. (1992). A critical review of ethical issues in dementia. In R. H. Binstock, S. G. Post, & P. J. Whitehouse (Eds.), Dementia and aging: Ethics, values and policy choices (pp. 86–100). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Post, S. G. (2000). The moral challenge of Alzheimer disease: Ethical issues from diagnosis to dying (2nd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Post, S. G., & Whitehouse, P. J. (1995). The Fairhill guidelines on ethics of the care of people with Alzheimer’s disease: A clinical summary. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43, 1423–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Representative Background Clinical Guidelines

  1. Committee on Children with Disabilities. (2001). American academy of pediatrics: Counseling families who choose complementary and alternative medicine for their child with chronic illness or disability. Committee on Children with Disabilities. Pediatrics, 107(3), 598–601.Google Scholar
  2. New Zealand Ministry of Health (2008). Diagnosis and initial assessment of ASD. In Ministries of Health and Education. New Zealand autism spectrum disorder guideline. (pp. 33–60). Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  3. Filipek, P. A., Accardo, P. J., Ashwal, S., Baranek, G. T., Cook, E. H., Jr., Dawson, G., et al. (2000). Practice parameter: Screening and diagnosis of autism: Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Child Neurology Society. Neurology, 55(4), 468–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnson, C. P., Myers, S. M., & American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Children With Disabilities. (2007). Identification and evaluation of children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 120(5), 1183–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Myers, S. M., Johnson, C. P., & American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Children With Disabilities. (2007). Management of children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 120(5), 1162–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)(2007). Assessment, diagnosis and clinical interventions for children and young people with autism spectrum disorders. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); (SIGN publication; no. 98).Google Scholar
  7. Volkmar, F., Cook, E. H., Jr., Pomeroy, J., Realmuto, G., & Tanguay, P. (1999). Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Working Group on Quality Issues. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(12 Suppl), 32S–54S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen G. Post
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • John Pomeroy
    • 2
  • Carla Keirns
    • 1
  • Virginia Isaacs Cover
    • 2
  • Michael Leverett Dorn
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Medical Humanities, Compassionate Care, and BioethicsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  2. 2.The Cody Center for Autism and Developmental DisabilitiesStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  3. 3.Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Center for Medical Humanities, Compassionate Care, and BioethicsStony Brook University School of MedicineStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations