HEC Forum

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 347–359 | Cite as

Blood Products and the Commodification Debate: The Blurry Concept of Altruism and the ‘Implicit Price’ of Readily Available Body Parts

Article
First Online:

Abstract

There is a widespread consensus that a commodification of body parts is to be prevented. Numerous policy papers by international organizations extend this view to the blood supply and recommend a system of uncompensated volunteers in this area—often, however, without making the arguments for this view explicit. This situation seems to indicate that a relevant source of justified worry or unease about the blood supply system has to do with the issue of commodification. As a result, the current health minister of Ontario is proposing a ban on compensation even for blood plasma—despite the fact that Canada can only generate 30 % of the plasma needed for fractionation into important plasma protein products and has to purchase the rest abroad. In the following, I am going to suggest a number of alternative perspectives on the debate in order to facilitate a less dogmatic and more differentiated debate about the matter. Especially in light of the often over-simplified notions of altruism and commodification, I conclude that the debate has not conclusively established that it would be morally objectionable to provide blood plasma donors with monetary compensation or with other forms of explicit social recognition as an incentive. This is especially true of donations for fractionation into medicinal products by profit-oriented pharmaceutical companies.

Keywords

Compensation for blood donation Commodification Canada Plasma 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arrow, K. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1, 343–362.Google Scholar
  2. Bani, M., & Giussani, B. (2010). Gender differences in giving blood: A review of the literature. Blood Transfusion, 8, 278–287.Google Scholar
  3. Biller-Andorno, N. (2002). Gender imbalance in living organ donation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 5, 204–1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buyx, A. (2009). Blood donation, payment, and non-cash incentives: Classical questions drawing renewed interest. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, 36, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canadian Blood Services. (2013). Complete 2012/2013 Financial Report. Retrieved July 14, 2014 from http://video.bloodservices.ca/Annual2013/pdfs/cbs_ar2013_finreport_en.pdf.
  6. Dhingra, N. (2013). International challenges of self-sufficiency in blood products. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, 20, 148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frey, B. (1997). Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Frey, B., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. American Economic Review, 87, 746–755.Google Scholar
  9. Frey, B., Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Eichenberger, R. (1996). The old lady visits your backyard: A tale of morals and markets. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 1297–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 791–810.Google Scholar
  11. Hupfer, M. E., Taylor, D. W., & Letwin, J. A. (2005). Understanding Canadian student motivations and beliefs about giving blood. Transfusion, 45, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kant, I. (1991 [1797]). The metaphysics of morals (Mary Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kant, I. (1998 [1785]). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (Mary Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kayler, L. K., Rasmussen, C. S., Dykstra, D. M., et al. (2003). Gender imbalance and outcomes in living donor renal transplantation in the United States. American Journal of Transplantation, 3, 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keown, J. (1997). The gift of blood in Europe: An ethical defence of ec directive 89/361. Journal of Medical Ethics, 23, 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khajehdehi, P. (1999). Living non-related versus related renal transplantation—its relationship to the social status, age and gender of recipients and donors. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 14, 2621–2624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marckmann, G. (2007). Human blood: Altruistic donation for commercial purposes? (in German). In J. Taupitz (Ed.), Kommerzialisierung des menschlichen Körpers (pp. 69–81). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mongoven, A. (2003). Sharing our body and blood: Organ donation and feminist critiques of sacrifice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 28, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ojo, A., & Port, F. K. (1993). Influence of race and gender on related donor renal transplantation rates. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2, 835–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oswalt, R. M. (1977). A review of blood donor motivation and recruitment. Transfusion, 17, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sandel, M. (2012). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2007). The tyranny of the gift: Sacrificial violence in living donor transplants. American Journal of Transplantation, 7, 507–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schlumpf, K. S., Glynn, S. A., Schreiber, G. B., Wright, D. J., Randolph Steele, W., Tu, Y., et al. (2008). Factors influencing donor return. Transfusion, 48, 264–272.Google Scholar
  24. Sojka, B. N., & Sojka, P. (2008). The blood donation experience: Self-reported motives and obstacles for donating blood. Vox Sanguinis, 94, 56–63.Google Scholar
  25. Steele, W. R., Schreiber, G. B., Guiltinan, A., Nass, C., Glynn, S. A., Wright, D. J., et al. (2008). Role of altruistic behavior, emphatic concern, and social responsibility motivation in blood donation behavior. Transfusion, 48, 43–54.Google Scholar
  26. Swanson, K. (2014). Banking on the body. The market in blood, milk, and sperm in modern America. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Titmuss, R. M. (1997). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy (2nd ed.). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  28. Trimmel, M., Lattacher, H., & Janda, M. (2005). Voluntary whole-blood donors, and compensated platelet donors and plasma donors: Motivation to donate, altruism and aggression. Transfusion Apheresis Science, 33, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wertheimer, A. (1996). Exploitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. WHO. (2013). Draft declaration on achieving self-sufficiency in safe blood and blood products, based on voluntary non-remunerated donations. Retrieved July 17, 2014 from http://www.fiods.org/main/sites/all/files/DRAFT.pdf.
  31. WHO. (2014). Blood safety and availability. Fact sheet no. 279. Retrieved July 17, 2014 from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs279/en/.
  32. Zimmerman, D., et al. (2000). Gender disparity in living renal transplant donation. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 36, 534–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Study in BioethicsUniversity of MünsterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations